The direct lateral approach: Impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 725-731

  Müller, Michael ^a   Schwachmeyer, Verena ^a   Tohtz, Stephan ^a   Taylor, William R ^a   Duda, Georg N ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a   Heller, Markus O ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Direct lateral approach; Foot progression angle; Gait analysis; Minimally invasive anterolateral approach; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT PROGRESSION ANGLE; GAIT; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WALKING SPEED;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; WALKING;

EID: 84862994050     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1467-x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Baker As, Bitounis Vc (1989) Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71:47-50.
2. Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M et al. (2011) Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy 27:235-251.
3. Bertin Kc, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: A modiWed Watson-Jones approach. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 429:248-255.
4. Bowman Kf, Fox J Jr, Sekiya Jk (2010) A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics. Arthroscopy 26:1118-1129.
5. Bowsher Ka, Vaughan Cl (1995) EVect of foot-progression angle on hip joint moments during gait. J Biomech 28:759-762.
6. Chen Dw, Hu Cc, Chang Yh et al. (2009) Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach. J Arthroplast 24:528-532.
7. De Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P et al. (2004) Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. J Arthroplast 19:945-950.
8. Demos Ha, Rorabeck Ch, Bourne Rb et al. (2001) Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 393:168-180.
9. Dorr Ld, Wan Z, Malik A et al. (2009) A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 91:2598-2604.
10. Gray H, Bannister L, Berry M et al. (1995) Gray's anatomy: The anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York.
11. Heller Mo, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G et al. (2001) InXuence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clinical Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16:644-649.
12. Heller Mo, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G et al. (2001) Musculoskeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomech 34:883-893.
13. Hendel D, Yasin M, Garti A et al. (2002) Fracture of the greater trochanter during hip replacement: A retrospective analysis of 21/ 372 cases. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 73:295-297.
14. Hill M, Wernig A, Goldspink G (2003) Muscle satellite (stem) cell activation during local tissue injury and repair. J Anat 203:89-99.
15. Kleemann Ru, Heller Mo, Stoeckle U et al. (2003) THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and oVset may lead to critical cement stresses. J Orthop Res 21:767-774.
16. LaVosse Jm, Chiron P, Molinier F et al. (2007) Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 31:597-603.
17. Lin Yc, Chen Ch, Huang Ht et al. (2007) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach: technique and preliminary results. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 23:611-617.
18. Lloyd Bd, Williamson Da, Singh Na et al. (2009) Recurrent and injurious falls in the year following hip fracture: A prospective study of incidence and risk factors from the Sarcopenia and Hip Fracture study. J Gerontol 64:599-609.
19. Lugade V, Wu A, Jewett B et al. (2010) Gait asymmetry following an anterior and anterolateral approach to total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:675-680.
20. Martin R, Clayson Pe, Troussel S et al. (2011) Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplast 26:1362-1372.
21. Masonis Jl, Bourne Rb (2002) Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 405:46-53.
22. Muller M, Tohtz S, Dewey M et al. (2010) Evidence of reduced muscle trauma through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach by means of MRI. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 468:3192-3200.
23. Muller M, Tohtz S, Springer I et al. (2010) Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modiWed direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(2):179-189.
24. Nankaku M, Tsuboyama T, Kakinoki R et al. (2007) Gait analysis of patients in early stages after total hip arthroplasty: eVect of lateral trunk displacement on walking eYciency. J Orthop Sci 12:550-554.
25. Da O'brien, Rorabeck Ch (2005) The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthop Relat Res 441:99-103.
26. Perry J, BurnWeld J (2010) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Slack Inc, Thorofare.
27. PWrrmann Cw, Notzli Hp, Dora C et al. (2005) Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 235:969-976.
28. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B et al. (2010) Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: A comparative gait analysis. J Bone Jt Surg 92:328-337.
29. Ramesh M, O'byrne Jm, Mccarthy N et al. (1996) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after the Hardinge approach to the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Br 78:903-906.
30. Rasch A, Dalen N, Berg He (2010) Muscle strength, gait, and balance in 20 patients with hip osteoarthritis followed for 2 years after THA. Acta Orthopaedica 81:183-188.
31. Roth A, Layher F, Venbrocks Ra (2006) Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results. Der Orthopade 35:744, 746-750.
32. Runge M (2002) Diagnosis of the risk of accidental falls in the elderly. Ther Umsch 59:351-358.
33. Sendtner E, Tibor S, Winkler R et al. (2010) Stem torsion in total hip replacement. Acta Orthopaedica 81:579-582.
34. Siebenrock Ka, Rosler Km, Gonzalez E et al. (2000) Intraoperative electromyography of the superior gluteal nerve during lateral approach to the hip for arthroplasty: A prospective study of 12 patients. J Arthroplast 15:867-870.
35. Svensson O, Skold S, Blomgren G (1990) Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplast 5:57-60