Stem torsion in total hip replacement: CT measurements in 60 patients

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 579-582

  Sendtner, Ernst ^a   Tibor, Schuster ^b   Winkler, Roman ^a   Wörner, Michael ^a   Grifka, Joachim ^a   Renkawitz, Tobias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PELVIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RELIABILITY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TORSION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PELVIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77957889307     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.524596     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anda S, Terjesen T, Kvistad K A, Svenningsen S. Acetabular angles and femoral anteversion in dysplastic hips in adults: CT investigation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15 (1): 115-120
2. Dorr L D, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2009; (467) (1): 119-127
3. Flecher X, Argenson J N, Parratte S, Ryembault E, Aubaniac J M. Custom cementless stem for osteoarthritis following developmental hip dysplasia. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2006; 92 (4): 332-342
4. Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac J M, Argenson J N. Three-dimensional custom-designed cementless femoral stem for osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (12): 1586-1591
5. Husmann O, Rubin P J, Leyvraz P F, de Roguin B, Argenson J N. Three-dimensional morphology of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (4): 444-450
6. Jerosch J, von Hasselbach C, Filler T, Peuker E, Rahgozar M, Lahmer A. Increasing the quality of preoperative planning and intraoperative application of computer-assisted systems and surgical robots-an experimental study. Chirurg 1998; 69 (9): 973-976
7. Maruyama M, Feinberg J R, Capello W N, D'Antonio J A.The Frank Stinchfield Award: Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop 2001; (393): 52-65.
8. Michel M C, Witschger P. MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007; 9 (1): 46-51. Review.
9. Murphy S B, Simon S R, Kijewski P K, Wilkinson R H, Griscom N T. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69 (8): 1169-1176
10. Ranawat C S, Maynard M J. Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Tech Orthopedics 1991; 6: 17-25.
11. Sariali E, Mouttet A, Pasquier G, Durante E, Catone Y. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (3): 333-340
12. Sugano N, Noble P C, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22 (4): 610-614
13. Tönnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81 (12): 1747-1770
14. Vandenbussche E, Saffarini M, Taillieu F, Mutschler C. The asymmetric profile of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop 2008; (466) (2): 417-423
15. Wines A P, McNicol D. Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (5): 696-701.