Effective connectivity modeling for fMRI: Six issues and possible solutions using linear dynamic systems

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JANUARY 2012, 2012, Pages

  Smith, Jason F ^a,d   Pillai, Ajay ^a   Chen, Kewei ^b,c   Horwitz, Barry ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BANNER GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d ARIZONA ALZHEIMER S CONSORTIUM   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic systems; Effective connectivity; fMRI

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN REGION; DYNAMICS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84862961887     PISSN: 16625137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00104     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Abarbanel, H. D. I. (1995). Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Abarbanel, H. D. I., Brown, R., Sidorowich, J. J., and Tsimring, L. S. H. (1993). The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1331-1392.
3. Abler, B., Roebroeck, A., Goebel, R., Hose, A., Schonfeldt-Lecuona, C., Hole, G., and Walter, H. (2006). Investigating directed influences between activated brain areas in a motor-response task using fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24, 181-185.
4. Alexander, G. E., and Moeller, J. R. (1994). Application of the scaled subprofile model to functional imaging in neuropsychiatric disorders: a principal component approach to modeling brain function and disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 79-94.
5. Allen, M. R., and Smith, L. A. (1996). Monte Carlo SSA: detecting irregular oscillations in the presence of coloured noise. J. Clim. 9, 3373-3404.
6. Andersen, A. H., Gash, D. M., and Avi-son, M. J. (1999). Principal component analysis of the dynamic response measured by fMRI: a generalized linear systems framework. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17, 795-815.
7. Babajani, A., and Soltanian-Zadeh, H. (2006). Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53, 1794-1801.
8. Barber, D. (2006). Expectation correction for smoothed inference in switching linear dynamical systems. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 2515-2540.
9. Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X. R., and Kirubara-jan, T. (2001). Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10. Beal, M. J., and Ghahramani, Z. (2001). The Variational Kalman Smoother. Gatsby Unit Technical Report TR01-003, University College London, London.
11. Benkwitz, A., Lütkepohl, H., and Neumann, M. H. (2000). Problems relates to bootstrapping impulse responses of autoregressive processes. Econom. Rev. 19, 69-103.
12. Broomhead, D. S., and King, G. P. (1986). Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data. Physica D 20 217-236.
13. Buchel, C., and Friston, K. J. (1997). Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modeling and fMRI.Cereb. Cortex 7, 768-778.
14. Bullmore, E. T., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Morris, R. G., Williams, S. C. R., Gregory, L., Gray, J. A., and Bram-mer, M. J. (1996). Functional magnetic resonance image analysis of a large-scale neurocognitive network. Neuroimage 4, 16-23.
15. Bullmore, E. T., and Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph-theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neu-rosci. 10, 186-198.
16. Buracas, G. T., Zador, A. M., DeWeese, M. R., and Albright, T. D. (1998). Efficient discrimination of temporal patterns by motion-sensitive neurons in primate visual cortex. Neuron 20, 959-969.
17. Cheng, B., and Tong, H. (1992). Non-parametric order determination and chaos. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Methodol. 54, 427-449.
18. Cole, D. M., Smith, S. M., and Beck-mann, C. F. (2010). Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting state data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:8. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008
19. Cox, H. (1964). On the estimation of state variables and parameters for noisy dynamic systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 9, 5-12.
20. Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., and Engel, A. K. (2006). Single-trial EEG-fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 10, 558-563.
21. Deleus, F., and Van Hulle, M. M. (2009). A connectivity based method for defining regions-of-interest in fMRI data. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18, 1760-1771.
22. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Methodol. 39, 1-38.
23. Doucet, A., and Andrieu, C. (2001). Iterative algorithms for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49, 1216-1227.
24. Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Zacks, J. M., and Raichle, M. E. (2006). Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat. Neu-rosci. 9, 23-25.
25. Freeman, W. J., Ahlfors, S. P., and Menon, V. (2009). Combining fMRI with EEG and MEG in order to relate patterns of brain activity to cognition. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 73, 43-52.
26. Friston, K. J. (1994). Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimag-ing: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 56-78.
27. Friston, K. J. (2011). Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality comments on: the identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage 58, 303-305.
28. Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., and Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273-1302.
29. Friston, K. J., Li, B., Daunizeau, J., and Stephan, K. E. (2011). Network discovery with DCM. Neuroimage 56, 1202-1221.
30. Friston, K. J., Mechelli, A., Turner, R., and Price, C. J. (2000). Nonlinear responses in fMRI: the balloon model Volterra kernels, and otherhemodynamics. Neuroimage 4, 466-477.
31. Friston, K. J., Rotshtein, P., Geng, J. J., Sterzer, P., and Henson, R. N. (2006). A critique of functional localizers. Neuroimage 30, 1077-1087.
32. Ge, T., Kendrick, K. M., and Feng, J. (2009). A novel extended Granger causal model approach demonstrates brain hemispheric differences during face recognition learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000570. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000570
33. Ghahramani, Z., and Hinton, G. E. (1996). Parameter Estimation for Linear Dynamic Systems. Technical Report CRG-TR-96-2. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, To r o n to.
34. Ghahramani, Z., and Hinton, G. E. (1998). Variational learning for switching state-space models. Neural Comput. 12, 963-996.
35. Ghil, M., Allen, M. R., Dettinger, M. D., Ide, K., Kondrashov, D., Mann, M.E., Robertson, A. W., Saunders, A., Tian, Y., Varadi, F., and Yiou, P. (2002). Advanced spectral methods for climatic time series. Rev. Geophys. 40, 1-40.
36. Goncalves, M. S., and Hall, D. A. (2003). Connectivity analysis with structural equation modeling: an example of the effects of voxel selection. Neuroimage 20, 1455-1467.
37. Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57, 357-384.
38. Harrison, L., Penny, W. D., and Friston, K. (2003). Multivariate autoregres-sive modeling of fMRI time series. Neuroimage 19, 1477-1491.
39. Havlicek, M., Friston, K. J., Jan, J., Brazdil, M., and Calhoun, V. D. (2011). Dynamic modeling of neu-ronal responses in fMRI using cuba-ture Kalman filtering. Neuroimage 15, 2109-2128.
40. Havlicek, M., Jan, J., Brazdil, M., and Calhoun, V. D. (2010). Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data. Neuroimage 53, 65-77.
41. Haykin, S. (2002). Adaptive Filter Theory, 4 Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
42. Horwitz, B. (2003). The elusive concept of brain connectivity. NeuroImage 19, 466-470.
43. Horwitz, B., Grady, C. I., Haxby, J. V., Ungerleider, L. G., Schapiro, M. B., Mishkin, M., and Rapoport, S. I. (1992). Functional associations among posterior extrastriate brain region during object and spatial vision. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4, 311-322.
44. Horwitz, B., and Poeppel, D. (2002). How can EEG/MEG and fMRI/PET data be combined. Hum. Brain Mapp. 17, 1-3.
45. Horwitz, B., Tagamets, M.-A., and McIntosh, A. R. (1999). Neural modeling, functional brain imaging and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 91-98.
46. Horwitz, B., Warner, B., Fitzer, J., Taga-mets, M. A., Husain, F. T., and Long, T. W. (2005). Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity: application to fMRI. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 1093-1108.
47. Julier, S. J., Uhlmann, J. K., and Durrant-Whyte, H. F. (1995)."A new approach for filtering nonlinear systems," in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, 3, 1628-1632.
48. Kilian, L. (1998). Small-sample confidence intervals for impulse response functions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80, 218-230.
49. Kilian, L., and Chang, P. L. (2000). How accurate are confidence intervals for impulse responses in large VAR models? Econ. Lett. 69,299-307.
50. Kim, C.-J. (1994). Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. J. Econom. 60, 1-22.
51. Kim, J., and Horwitz, B. (2009). How well does structural equation modeling reveal abnormal brain anatomical connections? An fMRI simulation study. Neuroimage 45, 1190-1198.
52. Kimoto, M., and Ghil, M. (1993). Multiple flow regimes in the northern hemisphere winter, part II, sectorial regimes and preferred transitions. J. Atmos. Sci. 50, 2645-2673.
53. Liu, J., and Newsome, W. T. (2006). Local field potential in cortical area MT: stimulus tuning and behavioral correlations. J. Neurosci. 26, 7779-7790.
54. Ljung, L. (1979). Asymptotic behavior of the extended Kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 24, 3-50.
55. Ljung, L., and Willis, A. (2010). Issues in sampling and estimating continuous time models with stochastic disturbances. Automatica 46, 925-931.
56. Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453, 869-878.
57. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Torsten, T., and Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, 150-157.
58. Logothetis, N. K., and Pfeuffer, J. (2004). On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22, 1517-1531.
59. Lohmann, G., and Bohn, S. (2002). Using replicator dynamics for analyzing fMRI data of the human brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21, 485-492.
60. Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20 130-141.
61. Lütkepohl, H. (2006). Structural vector autoregressive analysis for coin-tegrated variables. All. Stat. Arch. 90 75-88.
62. Lütkepohl, H. (2007). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
63. Makni, S., Beckmann, C., Smith, S., and Woolrich, M. (2008). Bayesian deconvolution of fMRI data using bilinear dynamic systems. Neuroim-age 42, 1381-1396.
64. Mañé, R. (1981). "On the dimension of the compact invariant sets of certain nonlinear maps," in Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, eds D. A. Rand and L. S. Young (Berlin: Springer), 230-242.
65. Marrelec, G., and Fransson, P. (2011). Assessing the influence of different ROI selection strategies on functional connectivity analyses of fMRI data acquired during steady-state conditions. PLoS ONE 6, e14788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014788
66. Martinez-Montes, E., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Miwakeichi, F., Goldman, R. I., and Cohen, M. S. (2004). Concurrent EEG/fMRI analysis by multiway partial least squares. Neuroimage 22, 1023-1034.
67. McIntosh, A. R., Bookstein, F. L., Haxby, J. V., and Grady, C. L. (1996). Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage 3, 143-157.
68. McIntosh, A. R., and Gonzalez-Lima, F. (1992). "The application of structural modeling to metabolic mapping if functional neural systems," in Advances in Metabolic Mapping Techniques for Brain Imaging of Behavioral and Learning Functions, eds F. Gonzalez-Lima, T. Finkenstadt, and H. Scheich (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 219-255.
69. McIntosh, A. R., Grady, C., Ungerleider, L. G., Haxby, J. V., Rapoport, S. I., and Horwitz, B. (1994). Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. J. Neurosci. 14, 655-666.
70. McKeown, M. J., Makeig, S., Brown, G. G., Jung, T. P., Kindermann, S. S., Bell, A. J., and Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum. Brain Mapp. 6, 160-188.
71. Menon, V., and Crottaz-Herbette, S. (2005). Combined EEG and fMRI studies of human brain function. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 66, 291-321.
72. Moeller, J. R., and Strother, S. C. (1991). A regional covariance approach to the analysis of functional patterns in positron emission tomographic data. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 11, A121-A135.
73. Murphy, K. P. (1998). Switching Kalman Filters. Technical Report, DEC/Compaq. Cambridge: Research Labs.
74. Nelson, A. T. (2000). Nonlinear Estimation and Modeling of Noisy Time-Series by Dual Kalman Filtering Methods. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon Graduate Institute, Hillsboro, Oregon.
75. Nelson, L. W., and Stear, E. (1967). The simultaneous on-line estimation of parameters and states in linear systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 12, 438-442.
76. Niedermeyer, E., and Lopes da Silva, F. H. (2004). "Electroencephalog-raphy" in Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, 5th Edn. (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins).
77. Oh, S. M., Rehg, J. M., Balch, T., and Dellaert, F. (2005)."Data-driven MCMC for learning and inference in switching linear dynamic systems," in Proceedings of the 20th AAAI National Conference on AI, Pittsburgh, 944-949.
78. Packard, N. H., Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D., and Shaw, R. S.(1980). Geometry from a time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 712-716.
79. Parkhomenko, E., Tritchler, D., and Beyene, J. (2009). Sparse canonical correlation analysis with application to genomic data integration. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 8. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1406
80. Patel, G. S., and Haykin, S. (2001). "Chaotic dynamics," in Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks, ed. S. Haykin (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons), 83, 122.
81. Penny, W. D., Ghahramani, Z., and Fris-ton, K. J. (2005). Bilinear dynamical systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 983-993.
82. Penny, W. D., Stephan, K. E., Dau-nizeau, J., Rosa, M. J., Friston, K. J., Schofield, T. M., and Leff, A. P. (2010). Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000709. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000709
83. Penny, W. D., Stephan, K. E., Mechelli, A., and Friston, K. J. (2004). Comparing dynamic causal models. Neu-roimage 22, 1157-1172.
84. Pessoa, L., Gutierrez, E., Bandettini, P. A., and Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance. Neuron 35, 975-987.
85. Pessoa, L., and Padmala, S. (2005). Quantitative prediction of perceptual decisions during near-threshold fear detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 5612-5617.
86. Plaut, G., and Vautard, R. (1994). Spells of low-frequency oscillations and weather regimes in the Northern hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 210-236.
87. Rajapakse, J. C., and Zhou, J. (2007). Learning effective brain connectivity with dynamic Bayesian networks. Neuroimage 37, 749-760.
88. Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J., Hanson, C., Halchenko, Y. O., Poldrack, R. A., and Glymour, C. (2010). Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. Neuroimage 49, 1545-1558.
89. Read, P. L. (1993). Phase portrait reconstruction using multivariate singular systems analysis. Physica D 69, 353-365.
90. Ress, D., and Heeger, D. J. (2003). Neu-ronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 414.
91. Riera, J. J., Watanabe, J., Kazuki, I., Naoki, M., Aubert, E., Ozaki, T., and Kawashima, R. (2004). A state space model of the hemody-namic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals. Neuroimage 21, 547-567.
92. Rissman, J., Gazzaley, A., and D'Esposito, M. (2004). Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task. Neuroimage 23, 752-763.
93. Ritter, P., and Villringer, A. (2006). Simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 30, 823-838.
94. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., and Goebel, R. (2005). Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neu-roimage 25, 230-242.
95. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., and Goebel, R. (2011). The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage 58, 296-302.
96. Rowe, J. B. (2010). Connectivity analysis is essential to understand neurological disorders. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:144. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00144
97. Runkle, D. E. (1987). Vector autoregres-sion and reality. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 5, 437-442.
98. Ryali, S., Supekar, K., Chen, T., and Menon, V. (2011). Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI. Neuroimage 54, 807-823.
99. Sardanyés, J., and Solé, R. V. (2007). Delayed transitions in nonlinear replicator networks: about ghosts and hypercycles. Chaos Solitons Fractals 31, 305-315.
100. Saxe, R., Brett, M., and Kanwisher, N. (2006). Divide and conquer: a defense of functional localizers. Neu-roimage 30, 1088-1096.
101. Schouten, J. C., Takens, F., and Van den Bleek, C. M. (1994). Estimation of the dimension of a noisy attractor. Phys. Rev. A 33 1134-1140.
102. Shumway, R. H., and Stoffer, D. S. (1991). Dynamic linear models with switching. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86, 763-769.
103. Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48, 1-48.
104. Sims,C. A. (1986). Are Forecasting Models Usable for Policy Analysis? Minneapolis: Quarterly Review Federal Reserve Bank, 2-16.
105. Sims, C. A., and Zha, T. (1999). Error bands for impulse responses. Econo-metrica 67, 1113-1155.
106. Sims, C. A., and Zha, T. (2006). Were there regime switches in U.S. monetary policy? Am. Econom. Rev. 96, 54-81.
107. Smith, J. F., Chen, K., Johnson, S., Morrone-Strupinsky, J., Reiman, E. M., Nelson, A., Moeller, J. R., and Alexander, G. E. (2006). Network analysis of single subject fMRI during a finger opposition task. Neu-roimage 32, 325-332.
108. Smith, J. F., Pillai, A., Chen, K., and Hor-witz, B. (2010). Identification and validation of effective connectivity networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging using switching linear dynamic systems. Neuroimage 52, 1027-1040.
109. Smith, S. M., Miller, K. L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Webster, M., Beck-mann, C. F., Nichols, T. E., Ramsey, J. D., and Woolrich, M. W. (2011). Network modeling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 54, 875-891.
110. Spiridon, M., Fischl, B., and Kanwisher, N. (2005). Location and spatial profile of category specific regions in human extrastriate cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27, 77-89.
111. Sporns, O., Honey, C. J., and Kotter, R. (2007). Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS ONE 2, e1049. doi:10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0001049
112. Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Moran, R. J., den Ouden, H. E. M., Daunizeau, J., and Friston, K. J. (2010). Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage 49, 3099-3109.
113. Stephan, K. E., Tittgemeyer, M., Knösche, T. R., Moran, R. J., and Friston, K. J. (2009). Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 47, 1628-1638.
114. Steriade, M. (2001). Impact of network activities on neuronal properties in corticothalamic systems. J. Neurophysiol. 86, 1-39.
115. Takens, F. (1981). "Detecting strange attractors in turbulence," in Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, eds D. A. Rand and L. S. Young (Berlin: Springer), 366-381.
116. Valdes-Sosa, P. A. (2004). Spatio-temporal autoregressive models defined over brain manifolds. Neuroinformatics 2, 239-250.
117. Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Roebroeck, A., Dau-nizeau, J., and Friston, K. (2011). Effective connectivity: influence, causality, and biophysical modeling. Neuroimage 58, 339-361.
118. Valdes-Sosa, P. A., Sanchez-Bornot, J. M., Lage-Castellanos, A., Vega-Hernandez, M., Bosch-Bayard, J., Melie-Garcia, L., and Canales-Rodrigues, E. (2005). Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 360, 969-981.
119. Valdez-Sosa, P. A., Sanchez-Bornot, J. M., Sotero, R. C., Iturria-Medina, Y., Aleman-Gomez, Y., Bosch-Bayard, J., Carbonell, F., and Ozaki, T. (2008). Model driven EEG/fMRI fusion of brain oscillations. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2701-2721.
120. Van Dijk, K. R. A., Hedden, T., Venkataraman, A., Evans, K. C., Lazar, S. W., and Buckner, R. L. (2010). Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human con-nectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 297-321.
121. Vautard, R., and Ghil, M. (1989). Singular spectrum analysis in nonlinear dynamics, with applications to pale-oclimatic time series. Physica D 35, 395-424.
122. Wagner, A. D., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., and Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory: functional-MRI evidence for context-dependent retrieval processes. Brain 121, 1985-2002.
123. Wan, E. A., and van der Merwe, R. (2001). "The unscented Kalman filter," in Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks, ed. S. Hayken (New York: Wiley Publishing), 221-280.
124. Wan, E. A., van der Merwe, R., and Nelson, A. T. (2000). "Dual estimation and the unscented transformation," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, eds S. A. Sola, T. K. Leen, and K. R. Muller (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 666-672.
125. Whitney, B. (1936). Differentiable manifolds. Ann. Math. 37 645-680.