Network modelling methods for FMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 875-891

  Smith, Stephen M ^a   Miller, Karla L ^a   Salimi Khorshidi, Gholamreza ^a   Webster, Matthew ^a   Beckmann, Christian F ^a,b   Nichols, Thomas E ^a,c   Ramsey, Joseph D ^d   Woolrich, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causality; FMRI; Network modelling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYESIAN LEARNING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET;

EID: 78649717035     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baccalá L., Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol. Cybern. 2001, 84(6):463-474.
2. Banerjee O., El Ghaoui L., d'Aspremont A., Natsoulis G. Convex optimization techniques for fitting sparse Gaussian graphical models. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning 2006, 96. ACM.
3. Buxton R., Wong E., Frank L. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:855-864.
4. Chang C., Glover G. Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. Neuroimage 2010, 50:81-98.
5. Chang C., Thomason M., Glover G. Mapping and correction of vascular hemodynamic latency in the BOLD signal. Neuroimage 2008, 43:90-102.
6. Chickering D. Optimal structure identification with greedy search. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3:507-554.
7. Daunizeau J., Friston K., Kiebel S. Variational Bayesian identification and prediction of stochastic nonlinear dynamic causal models. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 2009, 238(21):2089-2118.
8. Dauwels J., Vialatte F., Musha T., Cichocki A. A comparative study of synchrony measures for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG. Neuroimage 2010, 49(1):668-693.
9. David, O., in press. fMRI connectivity, meaning and empiricism: Comments on: Roebroeck et al. The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage, Corrected Proof:-
10. David O., Guillemain I., Saillet S., Reyt S., Deransart C., Segebarth C., Depaulis A. Identifying neural drivers with functional MRI: an electrophysiological validation. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6(12):e315.
11. de Pasquale F., Della Penna S., Snyder A., Lewis C., Mantini D., Marzetti L., Belardinelli P., Ciancetta L., Pizzella V., Romani G., Corbetta M. Temporal dynamics of spontaneous MEG activity in brain networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(13):6040-6045.
12. Deshpande G., Sathian K., Hu X. Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of fMRI. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 57(6):1446-1456.
13. Deshpande G., Sathian K., Hu X. Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI. Neuroimage 2010, 52(3):884-896.
14. Fox M., Zhang D., Snyder A., Raichle M. The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101(6):3270-3283.
15. Freenor, M. and Glymour, C., 2010. Searching the DCM model space, and some generalizations. NeuroImage. In submission.
16. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the Graphical Lasso. Biostat 2008, 9(3):432-441.
17. Friston K. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 2:56-78.
18. Friston K. Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7(2):e1000033.
19. Friston, K., in press. Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality. Comments on: The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage, Corrected Proof:-
20. Friston K.J., Harrison L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 2003, 19(3):1273-1302.
21. Geweke J.F. Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1984, 79(388):907-915.
22. Goebel R., Roebroeck A., Kim D.-S., Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003, 21(10):1251-1261.
23. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969, 37(3):424-438.
24. Grinsted A., Moore J., Jevrejeva S. Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 2004, 11(5/6):561-566.
25. Guo S., Seth A.K., Kendrick K.M., Zhou C., Feng J. Partial Granger causality-eliminating exogenous inputs and latent variables. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2008, 172(1):79-93.
26. Handwerker D., Ollinger J., D'Esposito M. Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage 2004, 21:1639-1651.
27. Havlicek M., Jan J., Brazdil M., Calhoun V.D. Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):65-77.
28. Kami?ski M., Blinowska K., Szelenberger W. Topographic analysis of coherence and propagation of EEG activity during sleep and wakefulness. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997, 102(3):216-227.
29. Kiviniemi V., Kantola J.-H., Jauhiainen J., Hyvärinen A., Tervonen O. Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources. Neuroimage 2003, 19:253-260.
30. Kiviniemi V., Starck T., Remes J., Long X., Nikkinen J., Haapea M., Veijola J., Moilanen I., Isohanni M., Zang Y.-F., Tervonen O. Functional segmentation of the brain cortex using high model order group PICA. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(12):3865-3886.
31. Larkin P. This Be The Verse 1971, New Humanist, August.
32. Marrelec G., Kim J., Doyon J., Horwitz B. Large-scale neural model validation of partial correlation analysis for effective connectivity investigation in functional MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(3):941-950.
33. Marrelec G., Krainik A., Duffau H., Pélégrini-Issac M., Lehéricy S., Doyon J., Benali H. Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI. Neuroimage 2006, 32:228-237.
34. McIntosh A., Gonzales-Lima F. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 2:2-22.
35. Meek C. Causal inference and causal explanation with background knowledge. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 1995, 403-410.
36. Nalatore H., Ding M., Rangarajan G. Mitigating the effects of measurement noise on Granger causality. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75(3):31123.1-31123.10.
37. Nolte G., Ziehe A., Nikulin V., Schlögl A., Krämer N., Brismar T., Müller K. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100(23):234101.1-234101.4.
38. Patel R., Bowman F., Rilling J. A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27:267-276.
39. Pereda E., Quiroga R., Bhattacharya J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 77(1-2):1-37.
40. Popa D., Popescu A., Paré D. Contrasting activity profile of two distributed cortical networks as a function of attentional demands. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(4):1191-1201.
41. Quian Quiroga R., Kraskov A., Kreuz T., Grassberger P. Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 65(4):41903.
42. Ramsey J., Hanson S., Hanson C., Halchenko Y., Poldrack R., Glymour C. Six problems for causal inference from fMRI. Neuroimage 2010, 49(2):1545-1558.
43. Ramsey J., Zhang J., Spirtes P. Adjacency-faithfulness and conservative causal inference. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2006.
44. Richardson T., Spirtes P. Automated discovery of linear feedback models. Computation, Causation, and Causality 2001, MIT Press. C. Glymour, G. Cooper (Eds.).
45. Ringo J., Doty R., Demeter S., Simard P. Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cereb. Cortex 1994, 4:331-343.
46. Roebroeck A., Formisano E., Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 2005, 25(1):230-242.
47. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., and Goebel, R., in press. Reply to Friston and David: After comments on: The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage, Corrected Proof:-
48. Roebroeck, A., Formisano, E., and Goebel, R., in press. The identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. NeuroImage, Corrected Proof:-
49. Rogers B.P., Katwal S.B., Morgan V.L., Asplund C.L., Gore J.C. Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2010, 28(8):1058-1065.
50. Seth A.K. A MATLAB toolbox for Granger causal connectivity analysis. J. Neurosci. Meth. 2010, 186(2):262-273.
51. Shannon C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27:379-423.
52. Shimizu S., Hoyer P.O., Hyvärinen A., Kerminen A. A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006, 7:2003-2030.
53. Tiao G., Wei W. Effect of temporal aggregation on the dynamic relationship of two time series variables. Biometrika 1976, 63(3):513-523.
54. Wei W. The effect of temporal aggregation on parameter estimation in distributed lag model. J. Econometrics 1978, 8(2):237-246.
55. Weiss A. Systematic sampling and temporal aggregation in time series models. J. Econometrics 1984, 26(3):271-281.
56. Witt S., Meyerand M. The effects of computational method, data modeling, and TR on effective connectivity results. Brain Imaging Behav. 2009, 3:220-231.
57. Wright S. Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 1920, 20:557-585.
58. Zhang J. On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. Artif. Intell. 2008, 172:1873-1896.
59. Zhou D., Thompson W.K., Siegle G. MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2009, 47(4):1590-1607.