Evaluation of test protocol variables for dental implant fatigue research

Dental Materials

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1419-1425

  Lee, Cornell K ^a   Karl, Matthias ^b   Kelly, J Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental implant complications; Environmental conditions; Fatigue testing; Loading frequency; Scanning electron microscopy

Indexed keywords

CRACK FORMATION; CRACK GROWTH; CYCLING RATES; DAMAGE MECHANISM; DENTAL IMPLANT COMPLICATIONS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EVALUATION OF TEST; FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH; FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATES; IMPLANT FAILURES; LIKELIHOOD OF FAILURES; LOADING FREQUENCY; MICROSCOPIC LEVELS; ROOM AIR; SURFACE FEATURE;

CRACK DETECTION; FATIGUE CRACK PROPAGATION; FATIGUE DAMAGE; FATIGUE TESTING; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TESTING; GRAIN BOUNDARIES; GRAIN GROWTH; SCANNING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEEL BRIDGES; TROPICAL ENGINEERING;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

AIR; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

AIR; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SODIUM CHLORIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 70349419552     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Taylor T.D. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 74-78
2. Zarb G.A., and Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III. Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 64 (1990) 185-194
3. Tolman D.E., and Laney W.R. Tissue-integrated dental prosthesis complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7 (1992) 477-484
4. Naert I., Quirynen M., van Steenberghe D., and Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II. Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 949-956
5. Pylant T., Triplett R.G., Key M.C., and Brunsvold M.A. A retrospective evaluation of endossesous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7 (1992) 195-202
6. Gunne J., Jemt T., and Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: a report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 7 (1994) 143-148
7. Lekholm U., Gunne J., Henry P., Higuchi K., Lindén U., Bergström C., and van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 (1999) 639-645
8. Henry P.J., Laney W.R., Jemt T., Harris D., Krogh P.H., Polizzi G., Zarb G.A., and Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a prospectve 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 (1996) 450-455
9. Balshi T.J. An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 (1996) 660-666
10. Allen P.F., McMillan A.S., and Smith D.G. Complications and maintenance requirements of implant-supported prostheses provided in a UK dental hospital. Br Dent J 182 (1997) 298-302
11. Adell R., Lekholm U., Rockler B., and Brånemark P.I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10 (1981) 387-416
12. Goodacre C.J., Kan J.Y., and Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 537-552
13. Eckert S.E., Meraw S.J., Cal E., and Ow R.K. Analysis of incidence and associated fractures with fractured implants; a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 662-667
14. Norton M.R. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implants design. Clin Oral Implants Res 8 (1997) 290-298
15. Möllersten L., Lockowandt P., and Linden L. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 582-591
16. Khraisat A., Stegaroiu R., Nomura S., and Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 604-610
17. Perriard J., Wiskott W.A., Mellal A., Scherrer S.S., Botsis J., and Belser U.C. Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors-a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 (2002) 542-549
18. Çehreli M.C., Akça K., İplikçioǧlu H., and Şahin S. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 (2004) 459-465
19. Wiskott H.W., Nicholls J.I., and Belser U.C. Stress fatigue: basic principles and prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont 8 (1995) 105-116
20. Karl M., and Kelly J.R. Influence of loading frequency on implant failure under cyclic fatigue conditions. Dent Mater 25 (2009) 1426-1432
21. Velásquez-Plata D., Lutonsky J., Oshida Y., and Jones R. A close-up look at an implant fracture: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 22 (2002) 482-491
22. Piatelli A., Piatelli M., Scarano A., and Montesani L. Light and scanning electron microscopic report of four fractured implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 561-564
23. Morgan M.J., James D.F., and Pilliar R.M. Fracture of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8 (1993) 409-414