Isointensity-isoexposure concept for seismic vulnerability analysis - A case study of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake

Engineering Geology

Volumn 131-132, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-10

  Tien, Yong Ming ^a   Juang, C Hsein ^a,b   Chen, Jian Min ^a   Pai, Chih Hung ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b AMRL   (United States)

^c NANYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Building damage; Earthquake; Fragility curve; Ground motion; Isoexposure; Isointensity

Indexed keywords

BUILDING DAMAGE; FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND MOTIONS; ISOEXPOSURE; ISOINTENSITY;

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

EARTHQUAKES;

BUILDING; CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE 1999; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; SEISMICITY;

TAIWAN;

EID: 84862804225     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akkar S., Sucuoǧlu H., Yakut A. Displacement-based fragility functions for low- and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2005, 21(4):901-927.
2. Baker J.W. Probabilistic structural response assessment using vector-valued intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:1861-1883.
3. Barbat A.H., Pujades L.G., Lantada N. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(10-11):851-865.
4. Bommer J., Spence R., Erdik M., Tabuchi S., Aydinoglu N., Booth E., del Re D., Peterken O. Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. Journal of Seismology 2002, 6(3):431-446.
5. Borzi B., Crowley H., Pinho R. Simplified pushoverbased earthquake loss assessment (sp-bela) method for masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 2008, 2(4):353-376.
6. Casciati F., Faravelli L., Liu X.D. Lessons of rehabilitation design learned from statistical analyses of masonry seismic-vulnerability data. Structural Safety 1994, 16(1-2, 10):73-89.
7. Central Weather Bureau, Taiwan Main shock data of 921 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan (ASCII) http://www.cwb.gov.tw/.
8. Choi I.K., Choun Y.S., Ahn S.M., Seo J.M. Seismic fragility analysis of a KSNP containment building for near fault. Earthquakes Transactions. 2007, SMiRT 19, Toronto, Paper No. M06/2.
9. Cole S.W., Xu Y., Burton P.W. Seismic hazard and risk in Shanghai and estimation of expected building damage. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(10-11):778-794.
10. Colombi M., Borzi B., Crowley H., Onida M., Meroni F., Pinho R. Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2008, 6(3):485-504.
11. Cornell A.C., Jalayer F., Hamburger R., Foutch D. The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAF/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2002, 128(4):526-533.
12. Erberik M.A. Generation of fragility curves for Turkish masonry buildings considering in-plane failure modes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008, 37(3):387-405.
13. Gent Franch K.A., Giuliano Morbelli G.M., Astroza Inostroza M.A., Gori R.E. A seismic vulnerability index for confined masonry shear wall buildings and a relationship with the damage. Engineering Structures 2008, 30(10):2605-2612.
14. Grant D.N., Bommer J.J., Pinho R., Calvi G.M., Goretti A., Meroni F. A prioritization scheme for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy. Earthquake Spectra 2007, 23(2):291-314.
15. Hsiao C.P., Tien Y.M., Chen J.C., Juang D.S., Pai C.H. Investigation and statistical analyses of the characteristics of buildings in which victims stayed in the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake (I) & (II). Report for the Architecture and Building Research Institute 2001, (in Chinese), Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, 193pp & 201pp.
16. Hsiao C.P., Lee B.J., Chou T.Y. Statistics and analyses on the characteristics of damaged building structures for Chi-Chi Earthquake. Report for the Architecture and Building Research Institute 2001, (in Chinese), Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, 224pp.
17. Hwang H., Huo J.R. Chapter 7.b: Development of fragility curves for concrete frame and shear wall buildings. Loss Assessment of Memphis Buildings. Technical Report, NCEER 97-0018 1997, 113-137.
18. Jaiswal K., Wald D., D'Ayala D. Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building yypes. Earthquake Spectra. 2011, 27(3):775-795.
19. Kafali C., Grigoriu M. Seismic fragility analysis: application to simple linear and nonlinear systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:1885-1900.
20. Kappos A.J., Panagopoulos G. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete buildings in Greece. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2010, 6(1-2):39-53.
21. Kappos A.J., Panagopoulos G., Panagiotopoulos C., Penelis Gr A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2006, 4(4):391-413.
22. Lang, K., 2002. Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. PhD thesis, ETH, Zurich, Hochschulverlag AG.
23. Lee B.J., Chou T.Y., Lei T.C. Development of hazard damaged buildings model by Chi-Chi earthquake data. Joint NCREE/JRC Workshop International Collaboration on Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Research, Taipei, Taiwan 2003.
24. Lupoi G., Franchin P., Lupoi A., Pinto P.E. Seismic fragility analysis of structural systems. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Paper No. 4008 2004.
25. Masi A. Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2003, 1(2):371-395.
26. Miyakoshi J., Hayashi Y., Tamura K., Fukuwa N. Damage ratio functions of building using damage data of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR) 1998, 349-354.
27. Mosalam K.M., Ayala G., White R.N., Roth C. Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1997, 1(4):693-719.
28. Onose J.I. Prediction of damage ratio of reinforced concrete buildings due to earthquakes and comparison with actual damage ratio. Proceedings of the 6th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium 1982, 2081-2088. Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo.
29. Orsini G. A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI). Earthquake Spectra 1999, 15(3):463-483.
30. Pai, C. H., 2006. A Method for estimating the distribution of death tolls induced from the disastrous earthquake. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 201pp.
31. Pai C.H., Tien Y.M., Wang Y.L. A study of the human-fatality rate in near-fault regions using the Victim Attribute Database. Natural Hazards 2007, 42(1):19-35.
32. Park J., Towashiraporn P., Craig J.I., Goodno B.J. Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures. Engineering Structures 2009, 31:125-137.
33. Penelis Gr.G., Kappos A.J., Stylianidis K.C. Assessment of the seismic vulnerability of unreinforced masonry buildings. Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture, Chalkidiki, Greece 2003, WIT Press, Southampton, UK.
34. Rossetto T., Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 2003, 25:1241-1263.
35. Rota M., Penna A., Strobbia C.L. Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28(10-11):933-947.
36. Shin T.C., Teng T.L. An Overview of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001, 91(5):895-913.
37. Singhal A., Kiremidjian A.S. A method for earthquake motion damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames. State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Report. NCEER-97-0008 1997.
38. Spence R.J.S., Coburn A.W., Pomonis A. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage based seismic intensity scale. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference Of Earthquake Engineering 1992, 551-556. AA Balkema, Rotterdam.
39. Spence R., Bommer J., del Re D., Bird J., Aydinoglu N., Tabuchi S. Comparing loss estimation with observed damage: a study of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2003, 1(1):83-113.
40. Spence R., So E., Jenny S., Castella H., Ewald M., Booth E. The global earthquake vulnerability estimation system (GEVES): an approach for earthquake risk assessment for insurance applications. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2008, 6(3):463-483.
41. Swell, R. T., 1989. Damage effectiveness of earthquake ground motion: Characterizations based on the performance of structures and equipment. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
42. Tien Y.M., Juang D.S., Pai C.H., Hsiao C.P., Chen C.J. Statistical analyses of relation between mortality and building type in the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 2002, 25(5):577-590.
43. Tothong P., Luco N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2007, 36:1837-1860.
44. Tsai Y.B., Yu T.M., Chao H.L., Lee C.P. Spatial distribution and age dependence of human fatality rates from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of 21 September 1999. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001, 91(5):1298-1309.
45. Wen K.L., Peng H.Y., Tsai Y.B., Chen K.C. Why 1g was recorded at TCU129 site during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2001, 91(5):1255-1266.
46. Wu Y.M., Teng T.L., Shin T.C. Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003, 93(1):386-396.
47. Yamaguchi N., Yamazaki F. Fragility curves for building in Japan based on damage surveys after the 1995 KOBE earthquake. Proceedings of the 12th conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand 2000.
48. Yamazaki F., Murao O. Vulnerability functions for Japanese buildings based on damage data due to the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. Implications of Recent Earthquakes on Seismic Risk: Innovation in Structures and Construction 2 2000, 91-102. Imperial College Press, London.