Seismic fragility analysis: Application to simple linear and nonlinear systems

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 1885-1900

  Kafali, Cagdas ^a   Grigoriu, Mircea ^a  

^a School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Fragility curves; Fragility surfaces; Intensity measures; Monte Carlo simulation; Seismic; Specific barrier model

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

INTENSITY MEASURES; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; SEISMIC GROUND MOTIONS;

SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; GROUND MOTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC MOMENT; SEISMIC SOURCE;

EID: 35748962057     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.726     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. HAZUS-MH. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology - earthquake model. Technical Manual, HAZUS-MH MR2, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2006.
2. Hwang HHM, Huo JR. Generation of hazard-consistent fragility curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1994; 13:345-354.
3. Hwang HHM, Jaw JW. Probabilistic damage analysis of structures. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1990; 116(7):1992-2007.
4. Hwang HHM, Lin H, Huo JR. Seismic performance evaluation of fire stations in Shelby County, Tennessee. Earthquake Spectra 1997; 13(4):759-772.
5. Ang AHS, Pires J, Villaverde R. A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1996; 51(4):7-22.
6. Choi E, DesRoches R, Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:187-199.
7. Garcia DL, Soong TT. Seismic fragility of block type non-structural components. Part 2: restrained components. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:131-149.
8. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T. Statistical analysis of fragihty curves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126(12):1224-1231.
9. Basöz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH. Statistical analysis of bridge damage date from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 1999; 15(1):25-54.
10. Hanks TC, McGuire RK. The character of high-frequency strong ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1981; 71(6):2071-2095.
11. DiPasquale E, Cakmak AS. Detection and assessment of seismic structural damage. Technical Report NCEER-87-0015, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, 1987.
12. Elenas A. Correlation between seismic acceleration parameters and overall structural damage indices of buildings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2000; 20:93-100.
13. Kafali C, Grigoriu M. Seismic fragility analysis. Proceedings of the Ninth ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability (PMC2004), Albuquerque, NM, 2004.
14. Schotanus MIJ, Franchin P, Lupoi A, Pinto PE. Seismic fragility analysis of 3D structures. Structural Safety 2004; 26:421-441.
15. Song J, Ellingwood BR. Seismic reliability of special moment steel frames with welded connections: II. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 125(4):372-384.
16. Ellingwood BR. Earthquake risk assessment of building structures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2001; 74(4):251-262.
17. Gardoni P, Mosalam KM, Der Kiureghian A. Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2003; 7(Special Issue 1):79-106.
18. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14(3):469-500.
19. Baker JW, Cornell CA. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:1193-1217.
20. Baker JW, Cornell CA. Choice of a vector of ground motion intensity measures for seismic demand hazard analysis. Proceedings of the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13 WCEE), Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
21. Luco N, Manuel L, Baldava S, Bazzurro P. Correlation of damage of steel moment-resisting frames to a vector-valued set of ground motion parameters. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR'05), Rome, Italy, 2005.
22. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Joseph Sun Woodward-Clyde Federal Services. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. SAC Background Report SAC/BD-97/ 04, SAC Joint Venture, a partnership of SEAOC, ATC and CUREE, Sacramento, CA, 1997.
23. O'Connor MJ, Ellingwood BR. Site-dependent models of earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:573-589.
24. Lin YK. Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1967.
25. Wen YK. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 1976; 102(EM2):249-263.
26. Papageorgiou AS, Aki K. A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of the inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part I: Description of the model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1983; 73:693-722.
27. Papageorgiou AS, Aki K. A specific barrier model for the quantitative description of the inhomogeneous faulting and the prediction of strong ground motion. Part II: Applications of the model. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1983; 73:953-978.
28. max. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1988; 78:509-528.
29. Halldorsson B, Papageorgiou AS. Calibration of the specific barrier model to earthquakes of different tectonic regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2005; 95(4):1276-1300.
30. Saragoni GR, Hart GC. Simulation of artificial earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1974; 2:249-267.
31. Halldorsson B, Dong G, Papageorgiou AS. Earthquake motion input and its dissemination via the internet. Journal of Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2002; 1(1):20-26.
32. Boore DM. Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2003; 160:635-676.
33. FEMA 273. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA Report 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 1997.
34. Soong TT, Grigoriu M. Random Vibration of Mechanical and Structural Systems. PTR Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
35. USGS. National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project, Earthquake Probability Mapping. United States Geological Surveys, 2006. (Available from http://eqint.cr.usgs.gov/eq-men/html/neweqprob-06.html)
36. Kafali C, Grigoriu M. Rehabilitation decision analysis. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR'05), Rome, Italy, 2005.
37. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim H, Uzawa T, Ueda T. Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Technical Report MCEER-03-0002, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, 2003.