Genome-wide comparative analysis of simple sequence coding repeats among 25 insect species

Gene

Volumn 504, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 226-232

  Behura, Susanta K ^a   Severson, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Codon bias; Codon pair repeats; Comparative genomics; Insect; Simple sequence repeats

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; AMINO ACID; DINUCLEOTIDE; NUCLEOTIDE DERIVATIVE; POLYALANINE; POLYGLUTAMINE; TRINUCLEOTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CODON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DROSOPHILA; GENOMICS; INSECT; INSECT GENOME; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT;

ANIMALS; CODON; GENOME, INSECT; INSECTS; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID;

HEXAPODA;

EID: 84862762978     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Behura S.K. Molecular marker systems in insects: current trends and future avenues. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:3087-3113.
2. Behura S.K., Severson D.W. Coadaptation of isoacceptor tRNA genes and codon usage bias for translation efficiency in Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol. Biol. 2011, 20:177-187.
3. Behura S.K., Stanke M., Desjardins C.A., Werren J.H., Severson D.W. Comparative analysis of nuclear tRNA genes of Nasonia vitripennis and other arthropods and relationships to codon usage bias. Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19:49-58.
4. Behura S.K., et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster and vector mosquito developmental genes. PLoS One 2011, 6:e21504.
5. Buchan J.R., Aucott L.S., Stansfield I. tRNA properties help shape codon pair preferences in open reading frames. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:1015-1027.
6. de Hoon M.J., Imoto S., Nolan J., Miyano S. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1453-1454.
7. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A.C., Garza J.C., Valdes A.M., Slatkin M., Freimer N.B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:3166-3170.
8. Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5:435-445.
9. Golding G.B. Simple sequence is abundant in eukaryotic proteins. Protein Sci. 1999, 8:1358-1361.
10. Huntley M.A., Clark A.G. Evolutionary analysis of amino acid repeats across the genomes of 12 Drosophila species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:2598-2609.
11. Huntley M., Golding G.B. Neurological proteins are not enriched for repetitive sequences. Genetics 2004, 166:1141-1154.
12. Huntley M., Golding G.B. Evolution of simple sequence in proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 2005, 51:131-140.
13. Huntley M., Golding G.B. Selection and slippage creating serine homopolymers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:2017-2025.
14. Karlin S., Burge C. Trinucleotide repeats and long homopeptides in genes and proteins associated with nervous system disease and development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:1560-1565.
15. Kashi Y., King D.G. Simple sequence repeats as advantageous mutators in evolution. Trends Genet. 2006, 22:253-259.
16. Katti M.V., Ranjekar P.K., Gupta V.S. Differential distribution of simple sequence repeats in eukaryotic genome sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:1161-1167.
17. Kofler R., Schlötterer C., Lelley T. SciRoKo: a new tool for whole genome microsatellite search and investigation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1683-1685.
18. Kruglyak S., Durrett R.T., Schug M.D., Aquadro C.F. Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:10774-10778.
19. Lai Y., Sun F. The relationship between microsatellite slippage mutation rate and the number of repeat units. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20:2123-2131.
20. Levinson G., Gutman G.A. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:203-221.
21. Marcotte E.M., Pellegrini M., Yeates T.O., Eisenberg D. A census of protein repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293:151-160.
22. Metzgar D., Liu L., Hansen C., Dybvig K., Wills C. Domain-level differences in microsatellite distribution and content result from different relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations. Genome Res. 2002, 12:408-413.
23. Ohta T., Kimura M. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet. Res. 1973, 22:201-204.
24. Richard G.F., Pâques F. Mini- and microsatellite expansions: the recombination connection. EMBO Rep. 2000, 1:122-126.
25. Rubinsztein D.C., Amos B., Cooper G. Microsatellite and trinucleotide-repeat evolution: evidence for mutational bias and different rates of evolution in different lineages. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999, 354:1095-1099.
26. Schlötterer C. Genome evolution: are microsatellites really simple sequences?. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8:R132-R134.
27. Schlotterer C., Tautz D. Slippage synthesis of simple sequence DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20:211-215.
28. Sharma P.C., Grover A., Kahl G. Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25:490-498.
29. Sutherland G.R., Richards R.I. Simple tandem DNA repeats and human genetic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92:3636-3641.
30. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
31. Tautz D. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17:6463-6471.
32. Tautz D., Trick M., Dover G. Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature 1986, 322:652-656.
33. Vasemägi A., Nilsson J., Primmer C.R. Expressed sequence tag-linked microsatellites as a source of gene-associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22:1067-1076.
34. Weber J.L., Wong C. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1993, 2:1123-1128.
35. Wernersson R., Pedersen A.G. RevTrans: multiple alignment of coding DNA from aligned amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:3537-3539.
36. Wierdl M., Dominska M., Petes T.D. Microsatellite instability in yeast: dependence on the length of the microsatellite. Genetics 1997, 146:769-779.
37. Wu C.H., Drummond A.J. Joint inference of microsatellite mutation models, population history and genealogies using transdimensional Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Genetics 2011, 188:151-164.
38. Zane L., Bargelloni L., Patarnello T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 2002, 11:1-16.