The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition: Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition, and artificial L2 development

Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 24-47

  Lantolf, James P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862556059     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French. Unpublished doctoral disseration, The Pennsylvania State University.
2. Agar, M. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Quill.
3. Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-483.
4. Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 576-598.
5. Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of L1 and L2 text recall tasks. Modern Language Journal, 78, 437-452.
6. Centeno-Cortés, B., & Jiménez-Jiménez, A. (2004). Problem-solving tasks in a foreign language: The importance of the L1 in private verbal thinking. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 7-35.
7. Choi, S.-J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2008). The representation and embodiment of meaning in L2 communication: Motion events in speech and gesture in L2 Korean and L2 English speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 191-224.
8. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Books.
9. Coughlan, P., & Duff, P. (1994). Same task different activities: Analysis of a SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 173-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. De Knop, S., & De Rycker, T. (Eds.) (2008). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. A volume in honor of René Dirven. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Dunn, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1998) Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Krashen's Incommensurable constructs; incommensurble theories. Language Learning, 48, 411-442.
13. Engeström, Y., & Middleton, D. (Eds.) (1998). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Flavell, J. (1966). La language privé [Private speech]. Bulletin de Psychologie, 19, 698-701.
15. Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. Chicago. IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19-44.
17. Gal'perin, P. Ia. (1970). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In E. Stones (Ed.), Readings in educational psychology: Learning and teaching (pp. 142-154). London: Methuen.
18. Grabois, H. (2008). Contribution and language learning: Service-learning from a sociocultural perspective. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 380-406). London: Equinox.
19. Guk, I., & Kellogg, D. (2007). The ZPD and whole class teaching: Teacher-led and studentled interactional mediation of tasks. Language Teaching Research, 11 281-299.
20. Gullberg, M. (in press). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In E. Pedersen & J. Bohnemeyer (Eds.), Event representations in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Haenen, J. (1996). Piotr Gal'perin: Psychologist in Vygotsky's footsteps. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
22. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice. Clinical and educational applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.) The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349-381). Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Karpov, Y. V. (2003). Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts: Its role for contemporary education. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39-64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Karpov, Y. V., & Hayward, C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. American Psychologist, 53, 27-36.
27. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
29. Lai, W. (2011). Concept-based foreign language pedagogy: Teaching the Chinese temporal system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. Manuscript in preparation.
30. Lantolf, J. P. (2007). Conceptual knowledge and instructed second language learning: A sociocultural perspective. In S. Fotos & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Form focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 35-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Lantolf, J. P. (2008). Praxis and L2 classroom development. ELIA: Estudios de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, 8, 13-44.
32. Lantolf, J. P. (in press). Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning, Vol. II. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
33. Lantolf, J. P., & A. K. Ahmed. (1989). Psycholinguistic perspectives on interlanguage variation: A Vygotskyan analysis. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition, Vol. II: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 93-109). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
34. Lantolf, J. P., & Beckett, T. (2009). Research timeline for sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42, 459-475.
35. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 38-53.
36. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1 49-74.
37. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2006). Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom: A teacher's guide [149pp. and Video DVD: Version 1.0]. University Park, PA: CALPER.
38. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15, 1-23.
39. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Lantolf, J. P., & Yáñez-Prieto, C. (2003). Talking yourself into Spanish: Intrapersonal communication and second language learning. Hispania, 86, 97-108.
41. Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior, 31 1-16.
43. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
44. Marx, K. (1845/1978). Theses on Feuerbach. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 143-146). New York: W. W. Norton.
45. McCafferty, S. G. (1994). The use of private speech by adult ESL learners at different levels of proficiency. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 117-134). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Moll, L. (Ed.) (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
49. Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching-learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
50. Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J. P., Jordan, S. R., & Gelabert, J. (2004). The "private function" of gesture in second language communicative activity: A study on motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 113-147.
51. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Özyürek, A. (2002). Speech-gesture relationship across languages and in second language learners: Implications for spatial thinking and speaking. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 26, 500-509.
53. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
54. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
55. Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 Dynamic Assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91 323-340.
56. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
57. Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 471-492.
58. Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology. A perspective on psychological functioning and social reform. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Sanchez Vasquez, A. (1977). The philosophy of praxis. London: Merlin Press.
60. Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157-192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Stam, G. (2006). Thinking for speaking about motion: L1 and L2 speech and gesture. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44, 143-169.
62. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Stetskenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (2004). Vygotskian collaborative project of social transformation: History, politics and practice in knowledge construction. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 12, 58-80.
64. Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
65. Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., & Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal, 93, 5-29.
66. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward cognitive semantics, Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Talyzina, N. F. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress Press.
68. Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research-1997-2007. Modern Language Journal, 91, 837-848.
69. Tarone, E., Bigelow, M., & Hansen, K. (2009). Literacy and second language oracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Thorne, S. L. Reinhardt, J., and Golombek, P. (2008). Mediation as objectification in the development of professional academic discourse: A corpus-informed curricular innovation. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 256-284). London: Equinox.
71. Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
72. Ushakova, T. N. (1994). Inner speech and second language acquisition: An experimental-theoretical approach. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 135-156). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
73. VanPatten, B. (2010). Some verbs are more perfect than others: Why learners have difficulty with ser and estar and what it means for instruction. Hispania, 93, 29-38.
74. Vocate, D. R. (1994). Self-talk and inner speech: Understanding the uniquely human aspects of intrapersonal communication. In D. R. Vocate (Ed.), Intrapersonal communication: Different voices, different minds (pp. 3-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Vygotsky. L. S. (1926/2004). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber & D. K. Robinson (Eds.), The essential Vygotsky (pp. 227-344). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
76. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. III: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum.
79. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178-192). New York: Cambridge University Press.
81. Yáñez-Prieto, C. M. (2008). On literature and the secret art of invisible words: Teaching literature through language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
82. Zhang, Y. (2008). Testing the topic hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 173-198). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.