Genome-wide analysis of human preimplantation aneuploidy

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 283-288

  Treff, Nathan R ^a,b,c  

^a REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; comprehensive chromosome screening; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; whole genome amplification

Indexed keywords

DNA POLYMERASE;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMERE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DIAGNOSTIC KIT; ECTODERM; EMBRYO TRANSFER; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; METAPHASE; MULTIPLE DISPLACEMENT AMPLIFICATION; POLAR BODY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; SISTER CHROMATID; TROPHECTODERM;

ANEUPLOIDY; BLASTOMERES; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC TESTING; GENOME; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; POLAR BODIES; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84862548520     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313907     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Munné S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril: 1995; 64 2 382 391
2. Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet: 2001; 2 4 280 291 (Pubitemid 33674776)
3. Hassold T, Hunt P. Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Curr Opin Pediatr: 2009; 21 6 703 708
4. Harper JC, Coonen E, De Rycke M., et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection X: cycles from January to December 2007 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2008. Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 11 2685 2707
5. Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod: 2008; 23 12 2617 2621
6. Treff NR, Levy B, Su J, Northrop LE, Tao X, Scott RT Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH. Mol Hum Reprod: 2010; 16 8 583 589
7. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. Mol Hum Reprod: 2010; 16 8 590 600
8. Treff NR, Ferry KM, Zhao T., et al. Cleavage stage embryo biopsy significantly impairs embryonic reproductive potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a novel paired analysis of cotransferred biopsied and non-biopsied sibling embryos. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 S2
9. Harper JC, Harton G. The use of arrays in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 4 1173 1177
10. Dolezel J, Bartos J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A: 2003; 51 2 127 128, author reply 129
11. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L., et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A: 2002; 99 8 5261 5266 (Pubitemid 34411536)
12. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B., et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet: 2010; 47 10 651 658
13. Handyside AH, Robinson MD, Simpson RJ., et al. Isothermal whole genome amplification from single and small numbers of cells: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of inherited disease. Mol Hum Reprod: 2004; 10 10 767 772 (Pubitemid 39341599)
14. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Maassarani G, Tortoriello D, Brody S. Genetic analysis of human embryos by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization (mCGH) improves efficiency of IVF by increasing embryo implantation rate and reducing multiple pregnancies and spontaneous miscarriages. Fertil Steril: 2009; 92 6 1886 1894
15. Keskintepe L, Sher G, Keskintepe M. Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in-situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. Reprod Biomed Online: 2007; 15 3 303 309 (Pubitemid 47430370)
16. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M., et al. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybrydization provides a highly reliable method for selecting "competento" embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil Steril: 2007; 87 5 1033 1040 (Pubitemid 46659945)
17. Voet T, Vanneste E, Vermeesch JR. The Human Cleavage Stage Embryo Is a Cradle of Chromosomal Rearrangements. Cytogenet Genome Res: 2011
18. Voet T, Vanneste E, Van der Aa N., et al. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles leading to inv dup del occur in human cleavage stage embryos. Hum Mutat: 2011; 32 7 783 793
19. Vanneste E, Melotte C, Voet T., et al. PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 4 941 949
20. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C., et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med: 2009; 15 5 577 583
21. Spits C, Le Caignec C, De Rycke M., et al. Optimization and evaluation of single-cell whole-genome multiple displacement amplification. Hum Mutat: 2006; 27 5 496 503 (Pubitemid 43673338)
22. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K., et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res: 2006; 34 9 e68
23. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online: 2008; 17 6 841 847
24. Hellani A, Coskun S, Benkhalifa M., et al. Multiple displacement amplification on single cell and possible PGD applications. Mol Hum Reprod: 2004; 10 11 847 852 (Pubitemid 40045018)
25. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J., et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 4 1066 1075
26. Brezina PR, Benner A, Rechitsky S., et al. Single-gene testing combined with single nucleotide polymorphism microarray preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy: a novel approach in optimizing pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 5 1786.e1785 1786.e1788
27. Ling J, Zhuang G, Tazon-Vega B., et al. Evaluation of genome coverage and fidelity of multiple displacement amplification from single cells by SNP array. Mol Hum Reprod: 2009; 15 11 739 747
28. Fishel S, Craig A, Lynch C., et al. Assessment of 19,803 Paired Chromosomes and Clinical Outcome from First 150 Cycles using Array CGH of the First Polar Body for Embryo Selection and Transfer. J Fertiliz In Vitro: 2011; 1 1 1 8
29. Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K., et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24 chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril: 2010; 95 5 1606 1612, e1601-1602
30. Fishel S, Gordon A, Lynch C., et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF? Fertil Steril: 2010; 93 3 1006e1007 1006e1010
31. Fiegler H, Geigl JB, Langer S., et al. High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells. Nucleic Acids Res: 2007; 35 3 1 10
32. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sánchez-García J., et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 3 953 958
33. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Levy B, Scott RT Jr. Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 6 2017 2021
34. Magli MC, Montag M, Koster M., et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part II: technical aspects. Hum Reprod: 2011
35. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC., et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod: 2011
36. Treff NR, Su J, Tao X, Northrop LE, Scott RT Jr. Single-cell whole-genome amplification technique impacts the accuracy of SNP microarray-based genotyping and copy number analyses. Mol Hum Reprod: 2011; 17 6 335 343
37. Malmgren H, Sahlén S, Inzunza J., et al. Single cell CGH analysis reveals a high degree of mosaicism in human embryos from patients with balanced structural chromosome aberrations. Mol Hum Reprod: 2002; 8 5 502 510 (Pubitemid 34567929)
38. Rius M, Obradors A, Daina G., et al. Reliability of short comparative genomic hybridization in fibroblasts and blastomeres for a comprehensive aneuploidy screening: first clinical application. Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 7 1824 1835
39. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B, Hirschhorn K, Delhanty JD, Munné S. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril: 2002; 78 3 543 549
40. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R, Wilton L. Chromosome analysis of blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Genet: 2000; 106 2 210 217 (Pubitemid 30156426)
41. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod: 2000; 6 11 1055 1062
42. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res: 1999; 27 4 1214 1218 (Pubitemid 29209528)
43. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D, Voullaire L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. N Engl J Med: 2001; 345 21 1537 1541 (Pubitemid 33144919)
44. Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod: 2008; 14 12 703 710
45. Hu DG, Webb G, Hussey N. Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod: 2004; 10 4 283 289 (Pubitemid 38456034)
46. Gabriel AS, Thornhill AR, Ottolini CS., et al. Array comparative genomic hybridisation on first polar bodies suggests that non-disjunction is not the predominant mechanism leading to aneuploidy in humans. J Med Genet: 2011
47. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D. First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 6 1560 1574
48. Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S., et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 7 1925 1935
49. Glessner JT, Hakonarson H. Genome-wide association: from confounded to confident. Neuroscientist: 2011; 17 2 174 184
50. Peiffer DA, Le JM, Steemers FJ., et al. High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res: 2006; 16 9 1136 1148 (Pubitemid 44320401)
51. Nannya Y, Sanada M, Nakazaki K., et al. A robust algorithm for copy number detection using high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. Cancer Res: 2005; 65 14 6071 6079 (Pubitemid 40994391)
52. Wong KK, Tsang YT, Shen J., et al. Allelic imbalance analysis by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphic allele (SNP) array with whole genome amplified DNA. Nucleic Acids Res: 2004; 32 9 e69
53. Scott RT Jr, Tao X, Taylor D, Ferry K, Treff N. A prospective randomized controlled trial demonstrating significantly increased clinical pregnancy rates following 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening: biopsy and analysis on day 5 with fresh transfer. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 4 S2
54. Treff NR, Tao X, Ferry KM., et al. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril: 2012; 97 4 819 824
55. Fragouli E, Delhanty JD, Wells D. Single cell diagnosis using comparative genomic hybridization after preliminary DNA amplification still needs more tweaking: too many miscalls. Fertil Steril: 2007; 88 1 247 248, author reply 248-249 (Pubitemid 47001406)
56. McReynolds S, Vanderlinden L, Stevens J., et al. Lipocalin-1: a potential marker for noninvasive aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril: 2011
57. Fragouli E, Wells D. Transcriptomic analysis of follicular cells provides information on the chromosomal status and competence of unfertilized oocytes. Expert Rev Mol Diagn: 2012; 12 1 1 4
58. Katz-Jaffe M, McCallie BR, Treff NR., et al. A novel profile of cumulus cell transcripts is associated with oocyte aneuploidy. Fertil Steril: 2008; S39
59. Geraedts J, Collins J, Gianaroli L., et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A polar body approach! Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 3 575 577
60. De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn: 2001; 21 9 767 780
61. Munné S, Weier HU, Grifo J, Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in human embryos. Biol Reprod: 1994; 51 3 373 379 (Pubitemid 24297607)
62. De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M., et al. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod: 2009; 24 12 2988 2996
63. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J., et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med: 2007; 357 1 9 17 (Pubitemid 47026730)
64. Schoolcraft WB, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Ferry K, Katz-Jaffe M, Scott RT Jr. Live birth outcome with trophectoderm biopsy, blastocyst vitrification, and single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based comprehensive chromosome screening in infertile patients. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 3 638 640
65. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 5 1700 1706
66. Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod: 2008; 23 11 2596 2608
67. Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertility and Sterility: 2008; 189 1 31 32
68. Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M., et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? A position statement from the ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Hum Reprod: 2010; 25 4 821 823
69. Munné S, Wells D, Cohen J. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 2 408 430
70. Scott RT Jr. Using the "omicso" to assess the reproductive competence of individual embryos. In: Midwest Reproductive Symposium. Chicago, IL: 2011
71. Harper J, Cristina Magli M, Lundin K, Barratt CL, Brison D. When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Hum Reprod: 2011
72. Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F., et al. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod: 2011; 26 1 33 40
73. Glentis S, SenGupta S, Thornhill A, Wang R, Craft I, Harper JC. Molecular comparison of single cell MDA products derived from different cell types. Reprod Biomed Online: 2009; 19 1 89 98
74. Grifo J, Ghadir S, Kaplan B., et al. Significant decrease in miscarriages after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for recurrent pregnancy loss using array comparative genome hybridization (Array CGH). Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 3 S23
75. Rabinowitz M, Beltsos A, Potter D., et al. Effects of advanced maternal age are abrogated in 122 patients undergoing transfer of embryos with euploid microarray screening results at cleavage stage. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 4 S80
76. Scott RT Jr, Ferry KA, Su J., et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective blinded nonselection study. Fertil Steril: 2012; 97 4 870 875
77. Seli E, Robert C, Sirard MA. OMICS in assisted reproduction: possibilities and pitfalls. Mol Hum Reprod: 2010; 16 8 513 530
78. Treff NR, Su J, Lonczak A, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. A subset of the cumulus cell transcriptome is predictive of euploid human oocyte reproductive potential. Fertil Steril: 2010; 94 S34 S35