Effects of pico-to-nanometer-thin TiO 2 coating on the biological properties of microroughened titanium

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 33, 2011, Pages 8374-8384

  Sugita, Yoshihiko ^a   Ishizaki, Ken ^a   Iwasa, Fuminori ^a   Ueno, Takeshi ^a   Minamikawa, Hajime ^a   Yamada, Masahiro ^a   Suzuki, Takeo ^a   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone implant integration; Microtopography; Molten Ti; Osseointegration; Sputter deposition

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS; BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BONE-IMPLANT INTEGRATION; IMPLANT SURFACE; MICROTOPOGRAPHY; MINERAL DEPOSITIONS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTIC DIFFERENTIATION; OSTEOGENIC CELLS; SMOOTH SURFACE; SURFACE FEATURE; SURFACE OXYGEN; THIN LAYERS; TIO; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; TITANIUM SUBSTRATES; TITANIUM SURFACES; UPREGULATED EXPRESSION;

ALKALINITY; BONE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COATINGS; GENE EXPRESSION; NANOPARTICLES; OXYGEN; PHOSPHATASES; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE MORPHOLOGY; SURFACES; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

TITANIUM;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; NANOPARTICLE; OXYGEN; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE MINERALIZATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE EXPRESSION; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PICO TO NANOMETER THIN TITANIUM DIOXIDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; THICKNESS; TOPOGRAPHY; UPREGULATION;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MALE; OSTEOBLASTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 80052964686     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.077     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aita H., Hori N., Takeuchi M., Suzuki T., Yamada M., Anpo M., et al. The effect of ultraviolet functionalization of titanium on integration with bone. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1015-1025.
2. Svanborg L.M., Andersson M., Wennerberg A. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010, 92:462-469.
3. Att W., Hori N., Takeuchi M., Ouyang J., Yang Y., Anpo M., et al. Time-dependent degradation of titanium osteoconductivity: an implication of biological aging of implant materials. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5352-5363.
4. Cooper L.F., Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., Felton D.A. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998, 13:163-174.
5. Kubo K., Tsukimura N., Iwasa F., Ueno T., Saruwatari L., Aita H., et al. Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5319-5329.
6. Ogawa T., Nishimura I. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res 2006, 85:566-570.
7. Ogawa T., Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:200-210.
8. Takeuchi K., Saruwatari L., Nakamura H.K., Yang J.M., Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 72A:296-305.
9. Butz F., Aita H., Wang C.J., Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006, 85:560-565.
10. Saruwatari L., Aita H., Butz F., Nakamura H.K., Ouyang J., Yang Y., et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro- and ultrastructure. J Bone Miner Res 2005, 20:2002-2016.
11. Tsukimura N., Kojima N., Kubo K., Att W., Takeuchi K., Kameyama Y., et al. The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 84:108-116.
12. Ong J.L., Prince C.W., Raikar G.N., Lucas L.C. Effect of surface topography of titanium on surface chemistry and cellular response. Implant Dent 1996, 5:83-88.
13. Park B.S., Heo S.J., Kim C.S., Oh J.E., Kim J.M., Lee G., et al. Effects of adhesion molecules on the behavior of osteoblast-like cells and normal human fibroblasts on different titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 74:640-651.
14. Feng B., Weng J., Yang B.C., Qu S.X., Zhang X.D. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblast. Biomaterials 2003, 24:4663-4670.
15. Zhu X., Kim K., Ong J.L., Jeong Y. Surface analysis of anodic oxide films containing phosphorus on titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002, 17:331-336.
16. Sul Y.T., Johansson C., Byon E., Albrektsson T. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005, 26:6720-6730.
17. Sul Y.T., Johansson C.B., Jeong Y., Roser K., Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001, 12:1025-1031.
18. Li D., Liu B., Han Y., Xu K. Effects of a modified sandblasting surface treatment on topographic and chemical properties of titanium surface. Implant Dent 2001, 10:59-64.
19. Mustafa K., Pan J., Wroblewski J., Leygraf C., Arvidson K. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of titanium surfaces cultured with osteoblast-like cells derived from human mandibular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 2002, 59:655-664.
20. Ogawa T., Ozawa S., Shih J.H., Ryu K.H., Sukotjo C., Yang J.M., et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000, 79:1857-1863.
21. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 - review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:536-543.
22. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000, 15:331-344.
23. Butz F., Aita H., Takeuchi K., Ogawa T. Enhanced mineralized tissue adhesion to titanium over polystyrene assessed by the nano-scratch test. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 74:164-170.
24. McAlarney M.E., Oshiro M.A., McAlarney C.V. Effects of titanium dioxide passive film crystal structure, thickness, and crystallinity on C3 adsorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996, 11:73-80.
25. Wang G., Cheng X.R. Characterizations of three surface-modified titanium oxide films. Chin J Dent Res 2000, 3:49-52.
26. Oji M.O., Wood J.V., Downes S. Effects of surface-treated cpTi and Ti6Al4V alloy on the initial attachment of human osteoblast cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999, 10:869-872.
27. MacDonald D.E., Rapuano B.E., Deo N., Stranick M., Somasundaran P., Boskey A.L. Thermal and chemical modification of titanium-aluminum-vanadium implant materials: effects on surface properties, glycoprotein adsorption, and MG63 cell attachment. Biomaterials 2004, 25:3135-3146.
28. Denholm E.M., Cauchon E., Poulin C., Silver P.J. Inhibition of human dermal fibroblast proliferation by removal of dermatan sulfate. Eur J Pharmacol 2000, 400:145-153.
29. Stein G.S., Lian J.B. Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. Endocr Rev 1993, 14:424-442.
30. Siddhanti S.R., Quarles L.D. Molecular to pharmacologic control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Biochem 1994, 55:310-320.
31. Alborzi A., Mac K., Glackin C.A., Murray S.S., Zernik J.H. Endochondral and intramembranous fetal bone development: osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist, and histone H4. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1996, 16:94-106.
32. Bachle M., Kohal R.J. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004, 15:683-692.
33. Zhao G., Schwartz Z., Wieland M., Rupp F., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Cochran D.L., et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005, 74:49-58.
34. Boyan B.D., Bonewald L.F., Paschalis E.P., Lohmann C.H., Rosser J., Cochran D.L., et al. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif Tissue Int 2002, 71:519-529.
35. Ogawa T., Sukotjo C., Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrix-related gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002, 11:241-247.
36. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Curtis A.S., Oreffo R.O. Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2007, 2:129-138.
37. Dalby M.J., Riehle M.O., Sutherland D.S., Agheli H., Curtis A.S. Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 69:314-322.
38. Alves N.M., Pashkuleva I., Reis R.L., Mano J.F. Controlling cell behavior through the design of Polymer surfaces. Small 2010.
39. Biggs M.J., Richards R.G., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine 2010.
40. Harvey E.J., Henderson J.E., Vengallatore S.T. Nanotechnology and bone healing. J Orthop Trauma 2010, 24(1):S25-S30.
41. Tran N., Webster T.J. Nanotechnology for bone materials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009, 1:336-351.
42. Ogawa T., Saruwatari L., Takeuchi K., Aita H., Ohno N. Ti nano-nodular structuring for bone integration and regeneration. J Dent Res 2008, 87:751-756.
43. Tsukimura N., Yamada M., Iwasa F., Minamikawa H., Att W., Ueno T., et al. Synergistic effects of UV photofunctionalization and micro-nano hybrid topography on the biological properties of titanium. Biomaterials 2011, 32:4358-4368.