Application of tubular ceramic ultrafiltration membranes for the treatment of integrated textile wastewaters

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 192, Issue , 2012, Pages 211-218

  Barredo Damas, S ^a   Alcaina Miranda, M I ^a   Iborra Clar, M I ^a   Mendoza Roca, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ceramic membranes; Pretreatment; Textile wastewater; Ultrafiltration; Water reclamation

Indexed keywords

APPLIED PRESSURE; CERAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSIVE FORCES; JOINT EFFECT; MEMBRANE SURFACE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; OPERATING CONDITION; PERMEATE FLUX; PERMEATE FLUX RATE; PERMEATE QUALITY; POLLUTANT LOAD REMOVAL; PRE-TREATMENT; PROCESS EFFICIENCY; TEXTILE WASTEWATER; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; WASTE STREAM;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; PH EFFECTS; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; TEXTILE MILLS; TEXTILE PROCESSING; TEXTILES; TURBIDITY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER DISPOSAL; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER FILTRATION;

CERAMIC MEMBRANES;

EID: 84862304814     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.079     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effects of operating conditions on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye/salt mixtures. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 33:283-294.
2. Amar N.B., Kechaou N., Palmeri J., Deratani A., Sghaier A. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:111-117.
3. De Florio L., Giordano A., Mattioli D. Nanofiltration of low-contaminated textile rinsing effluents for on-site treatment and reuse. Desalination 2005, 181:283-292.
4. Allègre C., Moulin P., Maisseu M., Charbit F. Treatment and reuse of reactive dyeing effluents. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 269:15-34.
5. Sostar-Turk S., Simonic M., Petrinic I. Wastewater treatment after reactive printing. Dyes Pigments 2005, 64:147-152.
6. Fersi C., Dhahbi M. Treatment of textile plant effluent by ultrafiltration and/or nanofiltration for water reuse. Desalination 2008, 222:263-271.
7. Carneiro P.A., Umbuzeiro G.A., Oliveira D.P., Zanoni M.V. Assessment of water contamination caused by a mutagenic textile effluent/dyehouse effluent bearing disperse dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174:694-699.
8. Capar G., Yetis U., Yilmaz L. Membrane based strategies for the pre-treatment of acid dye bath wastewaters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 135:423-430.
9. Capar G., Yilmaz L., Yetis U. A membrane-based co-treatment strategy for the recovery of print- and beck-dyeing textile effluents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152:316-323.
10. Suksaroj C., Héran M., Allègre C., Persin F. Treatment of textile plant effluent by nanofiltration and/or reverse osmosis for water reuse. Desalination 2005, 178:333-341.
11. De Vreese I., Van der Bruggen B. Cotton and polyester dyeing using nanofiltered wastewater. Dyes Pigments 2007, 74:313-319.
12. Marcucci M., Ciardelli G., Matteucci A., Ranieri L., Russo M. Experimental campaigns on textile wastewater for reuse by means of different membrane processes. Desalination 2002, 149:137-143.
13. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
14. Kim H.G., Park C., Yang J., Lee B., Kim S.S., Kim S. Optimization of backflushing conditions for ceramic ultrafiltration membrane of disperse dye solutions. Desalination 2007, 202:150-155.
15. Barredo-Damas S., Alcaina-Miranda M.I., Bes-Piá A., Iborra-Clar M.I., Iborra-Clar A., Mendoza-Roca J.A. Ceramic membrane behavior in textile wastewater ultrafiltration. Desalination 2010, 250:623-628.
16. Barredo-Damas S., Alcaina-Miranda M.I., Iborra-Clar M.I., Mendoza-Roca J.A., Gemma M. Effect of pH and MWCO on textile effluents ultrafiltration by tubular ceramic membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2011, 27:81-89.
17. Field R.W., Pearce G.K. Critical, sustainable and threshold fluxes for membrane filtration with water industry applications. Adv. Colloid Interface 2011, 164:38-44.
18. Aimar P., Bacchin P. Slow colloidal aggregation and membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360:70-76.
19. Ogunbiyi O.O., Miles N.J., Hilal N. The effects of performance and cleaning cycles of new tubular ceramic microfiltration membrane fouled with a model yeast suspension. Desalination 2008, 220:273-289.
20. Song L. Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 139:183-200.
21. Furukawa T., Kokubo K., Nakamura K., Matsumoto K. Modeling of the permeate flux decline during MF and UF cross-flow filtration of soy sauce lees. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:491-502.
22. Mourouzidis-Mourouzis S.A., Karabelas A.J. Whey protein fouling of large pore-size ceramic microfiltration membranes at small cross-flow velocity. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 323:17-27.
23. Benítez F.J., Acero J.L., Leal A.I. Treatment of wastewaters from the cork process industry by using ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 2008, 229:156-169.
24. Benítez F.J., Acero J.L., Leal A.I., González M. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162:1438-1445.
25. Rezvanpour A., Roostaazad R., Hesampour M., Nyström M., Ghotbi C. Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene-water emulsion by using UF membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161:1216-1224.
26. Landaburu-Aguirre J., Pongrácz E., Perämäki P., Keiski R.L. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for the removal of cadmium and zinc: use of response surface methodology to improve understanding of process performance and optimisation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180:524-534.
27. Akdemir E.O., Ozer A. Investigation of two ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of olive oil mill wastewater. Desalination 2009, 249:660-666.
28. Zhang Q., Jing W., Fan Y., Xu N. An improved Parks equation for prediction of surface charge properties of composite ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 318:100-106.
29. Bernat X., Pihlajamäki A., Fortuny A., Bengoa C., Stüber F., Fabregat A., Nyström M., Font J. Non-enhanced ultrafiltration of iron(III) with commercial ceramic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 334:129-137.
30. Zhao Y., Xing W., Xu N., Wong F.S. Effects of inorganic salt on ceramic membrane microfiltration of titanium dioxide suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 254:81-88.
31. Park C., Lee Y.H., Lee S., Hong S. Effect of cake layer structure on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2008, 220:335-344.
32. Kühnl W., Piry A., Kaufmann V., Grein T., Ripperger S., Kulozik U. Impact of colloidal interactions on the flux in cross-flow microfiltration of milk at different pH values: a surface energy approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352:107-115.
33. Garcia F.J.G., Chiu T.Y. Economic aspects of critical flux operability in star shaped microfiltration membranes: influence of some operating conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:641-646.
34. Lobo A., Cambiella á., Benito J.M., Pazos C., Coca J. Ultrafiltration of oil-in-water emulsions with ceramic membranes: influence of pH and crossflow velocity. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:328-334.
35. Li M., Zhao Y., Zhou S., Xing W., Wong F.S. Resistance analysis for ceramic membrane microfiltration of raw soy sauce. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 299:122-129.
36. Lin C.F., Yu-Chen Lin A., Sri Chandana P., Tsai C.Y. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline. Water Res. 2009, 43:389-394.
37. Uzal N., Yilmaz L., Yetis U. Microfiltration/ultrafiltration as pretreatment for reclamation of rinsing waters of indigo dyeing. Desalination 2009, 240:198-208.
38. Fersi C., Gzara L., Dhahbi M. Flux decline study for textile wastewater treatment by membrane processes. Desalination 2009, 244:321-332.
39. Ahmad A.L., Puasa S.W. Reactive dyes decolourization from an aqueous solution by combined coagulation/micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 132:257-265.
40. Koyuncu I., Topacik D., Wiesner M.R. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts. Water Res. 2004, 38:432-440.