Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts

Water Research

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 432-440

  Koyuncu, Ismail ^a,b   Topacik, Dincer ^a   Wiesner, Mark R ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cake formation; Dye bath; Dye salt mixtures; Flux decline; Nanofiltration; Operating conditions

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHOBICITY; NANOFILTRATION; PH EFFECTS; SALTS; WASTEWATER;

CAKE FILTRATION EQUATIONS; FLUX DECLINE;

DYES;

DYE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; COLORING AGENT;

DECOLORIZATION; FILTER CAKE; FOULING; MEMBRANE; NANOFILTRATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; FLOW RATE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NANOFILTRATION; PH MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; FILTRATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WATER MANAGEMENT;

COLORING AGENTS; FILTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TEXTILE INDUSTRY; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 1542752433     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gaeta S.N., Fedele U. Recovery of water and auxiliary chemicals from effluents of textile dye houses. Desalination. 83:1991;183-194.
2. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook. Lancester-Basel: Technomic Publishing Co.; 1998.
3. Wiesner M.R., Aptel P. Mass transport and permeate flux and fouling in pressure- driven processes. Malleviella J. Water treatment membrane handbook. 1996;McGraw-Hill Com, New York. (Chapter 4).
4. Koyuncu I., Kural E., Topacik D. Pilot scale nanofiltration membrane separation for waste management in textile industry. Water Sci Technol. 43(10):2001;233-240.
5. Erswell A., Brouckaert C.J., Buckley C.A. The reuse of reactive dye liquors using charged ultrafiltration membrane technology. Desalination. 70:1988;157-167.
6. Dhale A.D., Mahajani V.V. Reactive dye house wastewater treatment use of hybrid technology. membrane, sonication followed by wet oxidation Ind Eng Chem Res. 38:1999;2058-2064.
7. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effect of organic ion on the separation of salts by nanofiltration membranes. J Membr Sci. 195(2):2002;247-263.
8. Koyuncu I. Reactive dye removal in dye/salt mixtures by nanofiltration membranes containing vinylsulphone dyes. effects of feed concentration and cross flow velocity Desalination. 143(3):2002;243-253.
9. Machenbach I. Membrane technology for dyehouse effluent treatment. Membr Technol. 96:1999;7-10.
10. Shu L, Fane AG, Waite TD, Pailthorpe MT, Bliss PJ. Fouling and its removal in membrane treatment of dye solutions. Proceedings of the World Filtration Congress, London, UK, 2000. p. 647-50.
11. Venkidachalam G., Verma S.K. Modified cellulosic nanofiltration membrane with improved characteristics for desalination and concentration of reactive dyes. Indian J Chem Technol. 3:1996;131-135.
12. Majewska-Novak K., Kabsch-Korbutowicz M., Winnicki T. Salt effect on the separation by hydrophilic membranes. Desalination. 108:1996;221-229.
13. Wu J., Eitemen M.A., Law E. Evaluation of membrane filtration and ozonation for treatment of rective-dye wastewater. J Environ Eng. 124(3):1998;272-277.
14. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Comparative evaluation of the results for the synthetic and actual reactive dye bath effluent treatment by nanofiltration membranes. J Environ Sci Health Part A. A38(10):2003;2209-2218.
15. Koyuncu I. Influence of dyes salts and auxiliary chemicals on nanofiltration of reactive dye baths. experimental observations and model verification Desalination. 154(1):2003;79-88.
16. Mulder M. Basic principles of membrane technology. 1996;Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
17. Pillay V.L., Buckley C.A. Cake formation in cross-flow microfiltration systems. Water Sci Technol. 25(10):1992;149-162.
18. Jiraratananon R., Sungpet A., Luangsowan P. Performance evaluation of nanofiltration membranes for treatment of effluents containing reactive dye and salt. Desalination. 130:2000;177-183.
19. Taylor J.S., Jacobs E.P. Reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Malleviella J. Water treatment membrane handbook. 1996;McGraw-Hill Com, New York. (Chapter 9).
20. Yeung K.W., Shang S.M. The influence of metal ions on the aggregation and hydrophobicity of dyes in solutions. J Soc Dyers Colourists. 115:1999;228-232.
21. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effects of operating conditions on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye/salt mixtures. Sep Purif Technol. 33(3):2003;283-294.
22. Koyuncu I, Topacik D, Effect of cross flow velocity on salt rejection in dye/salt mixtures by nanofiltration membranes. J Environ Sci Health Part A 2004; in press.