Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: Mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 139, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 183-200

  Song, Lianfa ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Fouling dynamics; Mechanisms; Microfiltration; Modeling; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FILTERS (FOR FLUIDS); FOULING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

MICROFILTRATION;

MEMBRANES;

ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE FILTER; MICROFILTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL STUDY; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0032542504     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00263-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. [1] G.R.H. Belfort, Davis, A.L. Zydney, The behavior of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration, J. Membrane Sci. 96 (1994) 1-58.
2. [2] M. Cheryan, Ultrafiltration handbook, Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., 1986.
3. [3] L.J. Zeman, A.L. Zydney, Microfiltration and ultrafiltration, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1996.
4. [4] E.S. Tarleton, R.J. Wakeman, Understanding flux decline in crossflow microfiltration: Part I - Effects of particle and pore size, Trans IChenE 71 (1993) 399-410.
5. [5] R.J. Wakeman, Visualisation of cake formation in crossflow microfiltration, Trans ICHemE 72 (1994) 530-540.
6. [6] J. Hermia, Constant pressure blocking filtration laws: application to power-law non-newtonian fluids, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 60 (1982) 183.
7. [7] R.H. Davis, Modeling of fouling of crossflow microfiltration membranes, Separation and Purification Methods 21(2) (1992) 75-126.
8. [8] W.F. Blatt, A. Dravid, A.S. Michaels, L. Nelson, Solution polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration, causes, consequences, and control techniques, in: J.E. Flinn (Ed.), Membrane Science and Technology, Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1970, pp. 47-97.
9. [9] C. Porter, Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration, Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Develop. 11 (1972) 234-248.
10. [10] A.G. Fane, Ultrafiltration: Factors influencing flux and rejection, in: R.J. Wakeman (Ed.), Progress in Filtration and Separation, Vol. IV, Elsevier, 1986, pp. 101-179.
11. [11] E.M. Tracey, R.H. Davis, Protein fouling of track-etched polycarbonate microfiltration membranes, J. Membrane Sci. 167 (1994) 104-116.
12. [12] S.T. Kelly, A.L. Zydney, Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration, J. Membrane Sci. 107 (1995) 115-127.
13. [13] K. Stamatakis, C. Tien, A simple model of cross-flow filtration based on particle adhesion, AIChE 39 (1993) 1292-1302.
14. [14] C.A. Romero, R.H. Davis, Transient model of crossflow microfiltration, Chemical Engineering Science 45 (1990) 13-25.
15. [15] L. Song, A new model for the prediction of the limiting flux in ultrafiltration, submitted to J. Membrane Sci.
16. [16] L. Song, M. Elimelech, Theory of concentration polarization in crossflow filtration, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91(19) (1995) 3389-3398.
17. [17] J.A. Howell, Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration, J. Membrane Sci. 107 (1995) 165-171.
18. [18] A.A.G. Suki, Fane, C.J.D. Fell, Flux decline in protein ultrafiltration, J. Membrane Sci. 21 (1984) 269-283.
19. [19] D.R. Trettin, M.R. Doshi, Limiting flux in ultrafiltration of macromolecular solution, Chem. Eng. Commun. 4 (1980) 507-522.
20. [20] C. Tien, Granular Filtration of Aerosols and Hydrosols, Butterworth Publishers, 1989.
21. [21] M. Hlavacek, F. Bouchet, Constant flowrate blocking laws and an example of their application to dead-end microfiltration of protein solutions, J. Membrane Sci. 82 (1993) 285-295.
22. [22] J. Hermia, Constant pressure blocking filtration laws, Application to power-law non-Newtonian fluids, Trans. Inst. Chem. E. 60 (1982) 183-187.
23. [23] J. Granger, D. Leclerc, J.A. Dodds, Filtration of dilute suspensions of latexes, Filtr. Separ. 22 (1985) 58-60.