The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 162, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 1438-1445

  Benítez, F Javier ^a   Acero, Juan L ^a   Leal, Ana I ^a   González, Manuel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cork processing wastewater; Rejection coefficients; Steady state permeate flux; Ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; FILTRATION; FLUXES; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; POROUS MATERIALS; PURIFICATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION;

ABSORBANCE; CORK PROCESSING WASTEWATER; ELLAGIC ACIDS; EXTERNAL-; FILTRATION MEMBRANES; FOULING RESISTANCES; GLOBAL POLLUTANTS; NF MEMBRANES; OPERATING CONDITIONS; OPERATING VARIABLES; PROCESSING TIMES; REJECTION COEFFICIENTS; RETENTATE; RETENTION FACTORS; SERIES MODELS; STEADY-STATE PERMEATE FLUX; TANGENTIAL VELOCITIES; TOTAL RESISTANCES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; UF MEMBRANES;

NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

ABSORPTION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOULING; LABORATORY METHOD; MEMBRANE; PERMEABILITY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; PARAMETER; POLLUTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER PERMEABILITY;

MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PERMEABILITY; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER POLLUTANTS;

EID: 57649220702     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.036     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baker R.W. Membrane Separation Systems-Recent Development, Future Direction (1991), Noyes Data Corporation, New York
2. Ahmad A.L., Sarif M., and Ismail S. Development of an integrally skinned ultrafiltration membrane for wastewater treatment; effect of different formulations of PSf/NMP/PVP on flux and rejection. Desalination 179 (2005) 257-263
3. Scholz W., and Lucas M. Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and re-use of tanning chemicals. Water Res. 37 (2003) 1859-1867
4. Wiesner M.R., and Aptel P. Mass transport and permeate flux and fouling in pressure-driven processes. In: Mallevialle J., Odendaal P.E., and Wiesner M.R. (Eds). Water Treatment Membrane Processes (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York (Chapter 4)
5. van der Bruggen B., Lejon L., and Vandecasteele C. Reuse, treatment and discharge of the concentrate pressure-driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (2003) 3733-3738
6. Kweon J.H., and Lawler D.F. Fouling mechanisms in the integrated system with softening and ultrafiltration. Water Res. 38 (2004) 4164-4172
7. Karakulski K. Purification of bilge water by hybrid ultrafiltration and photocatalytic processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 14 (1998) 163-173
8. Tansell B., Regula J., and Shalewitz R. Evaluation of ultrafiltration process performance for treatment of petroleum contaminated water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 126 (2001) 291-305
9. Molinari R., Buonomenna M.G., Cassano A., and Drioli E. Recovery and recycle of tannins in the leather industry by nanofiltration membranes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79 (2004) 361-368
10. Fugere R., Mameri N., Gallot J.E., and Comeau Y. Treatment of pig farm effluents by ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 225-231
11. Dhouib A., Aloui F., Hamad N., and Sayadi S. Pilot-plant treatment of olive mill wastewaters by Phanerochaete chrysosporium coupled to anaerobic digestion and ultrafiltration. Process Biochem. 41 (2006) 159-167
12. Paraskeva C.A., Papadakis V.G., Tsarouchi E., Kanellopoulou D.G., Koutsoukos P.G., and Angelopoulos K.C. Membrane processing for olive mill wastewater fractionation. Desalination 213 (2007) 218-229
13. Russo C. A new membrane process for the selective fractionation and total recovery of polyphenols, water and organic substances from vegetation waters (VW). J. Membr. Sci. 288 (2007) 239-246
14. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed., American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Washington, DC, 1985.
15. Ferjani E., Ellouze E., and Ben Amar R. Treatment of seafood processing wastewaters by ultrafiltration-nanofiltration cellulose acetate membranes. Desalination 177 (2005) 43-49
16. Vladisavljevic G.T., Vukosavljevic P., and Bukvic B. Permeate flux and fouling resistance in ultrafiltration of depectinized apple juice using ceramic membranes. J. Food Eng. 60 (2003) 241-247
17. Fersi C., Gzara L., and Dhabi M. Treatment of textile effluents by membrane technologies. Desalination 185 (2005) 399-409
18. Cassano A., Donato L., and Drioli E. Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice: operating parameters, juice quality and membrane fouling. J. Food Eng. 79 (2007) 613-621
19. Banerjee P., DasGupta S., and De S. Removal of dye from aqueous solution using a combination of advanced oxidation process and nanofiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 140 (2007) 95-103
20. Koyuncu I., and Topacik D. Effect of organic ion on the separation of salts by nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 195 (2002) 247-263
21. Minhalma M., and De Pinho M.N. Flocculation/flotation/ultrafiltration integrated process for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 4916-4921
22. Yoon Y., Amy G., Cho J., and Her N. Effects of retained natural organic matter (NOM) on NOM rejection and membrane flux decline with nanofiltration and ultrafiltration. Desalination 173 (2005) 209-221
23. Jiraratananon R., and Chanachai A. A study of fouling in the ultrafiltration of passion fruit juice. J. Membr. Sci. 111 (1996) 39-48
24. Oh B.S., Jang H.Y., Hwang T.M., and Kang J.-W. Role of ozone for reducing fouling due to pharmaceuticals in MF (microfiltration) process. J. Membr. Sci. 289 (2007) 178-186