An accomplished teacher’s use of scaffolding during a second-grade unit on designing games

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 221-234

  Chen, Weiyun ^a   Rovegno, Inez ^b   Cone, Stephen L ^c   Cone, Theresa P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^c ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Creative thinking; Critical thinking; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CREATIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; LEISURE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEACHING; THINKING;

ADULT; CHILD; CREATIVENESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MATHEMATICS; MOVEMENT; PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TEACHING; THINKING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 84862272683     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599853     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bonnette, R., McBride, R., & Tolson, T. (2001). The differential effect of indirect instruction in the teaching of sport skills on critical thinking and self-esteem of early adolescent boys placed at risk. Sport, Education and Society, 6, 183-198.
2. Brock, S. J., Rovegno, I., & Oliver, K. (2009). The influence of student status on student interactions and experiences during a sport education unit. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 14, 355-375.
3. Carlson, T., & Hastie, P. A. (1997). The student social system within sport education. Journal ofTeachingin Physical Education, 16, 176-195.
4. Chen, W., & Cone, T. (2003). Links between children’s use of critical thinking and an expert teacher’s teaching in creative dance. JournalofTeaching inPhysicalEducation, 22, 169-185.
5. Chen, W., Rovegno, I., & Iran-Nejad, A. (2002). Application of a wholetheme perspective to the movement approach to teaching physical education in elementary school. Education, 123, 401-415.
6. Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students’ comprehension of text. The Reeding Teacher, 58, 570-580.
7. Cleland, F. (1994). Young children’s divergent movement ability: Study II. JournalofTeachinginPhysicdEducation, 13, 229-241.
8. Dyson, B. (2002). The implementation of cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 264-281.
9. Fernández, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36, 40-54.
10. Hastie, P. A. (2010). Student-designed games: Strategies for promoting creativity, cooperation, and skill development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
11. Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 74-107). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
12. Ledingham, D., & Cox, R. L. (1989). Games-making evaluated. Scottish Journal of Physical Education, 17(3), 14-16.
13. Macdonald, D. (2004). Rich tasks, rich learning? Working with integration from a physical education perspective. In J. Wright, D. Macdonald, & L. Burrows (Eds.), Critical inquiry and problem-solving in physical education (pp. 120-132). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
14. MacPhail, A., Kirk, D., & Kinchin, G. (2004). Sport education: Promoting team affiliation through physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 106-122.
15. McBride, R. E., & Xiang, P. (2004). Thoughtful decision making in physical education: A modest proposal. Quest, 56, 337-354.
16. Many, J. E. (2002). An exhibition and analysis ofverbal tapestries: Understanding how scaffolding is woven into the fabric of instructional conversations. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 376-407.
17. Maloch, B. (2002). Scaffolding student talk: One teacher’s role in literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 94-112.
18. Mauldon, E., & Redfern, H. B. (1969). Games teaching: A new approach for the primary school. London: Macdonald & Evans.
19. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 17-25.
20. National Research Council. (1999). Horn people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Oliver, K. L., & Hamzeh, M. (2010). “The boys won’t let us play:” Fifth-grade mestizas challenge physical activity discourse at school. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 38-51.
22. Oliver, K L., Hamzeh, M., & McCaughtry, N. (2009). Girly girls can play games/Las niñas pueden jugar también: Co-creating a curriculum of possibilities with fifth-grade girls. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 90-110.
23. Oliver, K L., & Lalik, R. (2004). Critical inquiry on the body in girls’ physical education classes: A critical poststructural perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 23, 162-195.
24. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40, 1-12.
26. Resnick, L. B., & Williams-Hall, M. (1998). Learning organizations for sustainable education reform. Daedalus, 127(4), 89-118.
27. Roehler, L. R., & Cantlon, D. J. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and ssues (pp. 6-42). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
28. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Rovegno, I., & Bandhauer, D. (1994). Child-designed games— Experience changes teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65(6), 60-63.
30. Rovengo, I., Chen, W., & Todorovich, J. (2003). Accomplished teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching dribbling to third grade children. Journal ofTeaching in Physical Education, 22, 426-449.
31. Rovegno, I., & Dolly, J. (2006). Constructivist perspectives on learning. In D. Kirk, D. Macdonald, & M. O’Sullivan (Eds.), Handbookofphysicaleducation (pp. 242-261). London: Sage.
32. Rovegno, I., Skonie, R., Charpenel, T., & Sieving, J. (1995). Learning to teach critical thinking through child-designed games. Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 6(1), 1, 6-7, 15.
33. Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Thorpe, R., Bunker, D., & Almond, L. (1986). Rethinking games teaching Loughborough, UK: University of Technology.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Warwick, P., & Maloch, B. (2003). Scaffolding speech and writing in the primary classroom: A consideration of work with literature and science pupil groups in the USA and UK. Reading Literacy and Language, 37(2), 54-63.
37. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practices as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72, 131-175.
38. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.