Ultrasound-guided breast-sparing surgery to improve cosmetic outcomes and quality of life. A prospective multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided surgery to traditional palpation-guided surgery (COBALT trial)

BMC Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Krekel, Nicole M A ^a   Zonderhuis, Barbara M ^a   Schreurs, Hermien W H ^b   Lopes Cardozo, Alexander M F ^b   Rijna, Herman ^c   Van Der Veen, Henk ^d   Muller, Sandra ^d   Poortman, Pieter ^e   De Widt, Louise ^e   De Roos, Wilfred K ^f   Bosch, Anne Marie ^f   Taets Van Amerongen, Annette H M ^a   Bergers, Elisabeth ^a   Van Der Linden, Mecheline H M ^a   De Lange De Klerk, Elly S M ^a   Winters, Henri A H ^a   Meijer, Sybren ^a   Van Den Tol, Petrousjka Mp ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Northwest Clinics   (Netherlands)

^c Kennemer Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^d RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e Waterland Hospital   (Netherlands)

^f GELDERSE VALLEI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PALPATION; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PALPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 79952697046     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712482     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. cijfers, overleving; borst. Nederlands Kankerregistratie (NKR) 6 2003
2. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. PJ Borgstein R Pijpers EF Comans PJ van Diest RP Boom S Meijer, J Am Coll Surg 1998 186 275 283 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00011-8 9510258 (Pubitemid 28124433)
3. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. B Fisher S Anderson J Bryant RG Margolese M Deutsch ER Fisher,, et al. N Engl J Med 2002 347 1233 1241 10.1056/NEJMoa022152 12393820 (Pubitemid 35176242)
4. The implementation of the sentinel node biopsy as a routine procedure for patients with breast cancer. FD Rahusen R Pijpers PJ van Diest RP Bleichrodt H Torrenga S Meijer, Surgery 2000 128 6 12 10.1067/msy.2000.107229 10876178 (Pubitemid 30456888)
5. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. U Veronesi A Banfi B Salvadori A Luini R Saccozzi R Zucali,, et al. Eur J Cancer 1990 26 668 670 10.1016/0277-5379(90) 90113-8 2144152 (Pubitemid 20275096)
6. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? SK Al-Ghazal L Fallowfield RW Blamey, Eur J Surg Oncol 1999 25 571 573 10.1053/ejso.1999.0708 10556001
7. Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. D Curran JP van Dongen NK Aaronson G Kiebert IS Fentiman F Mignolet,, et al. Eur J Cancer 1998 34 307 314 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00312-2 9640214 (Pubitemid 28183826)
8. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. KC Sneeuw NK Aaronson JR Yarnold M Broderick J Regan G Ross,, et al. Radiother Oncol 1992 25 160 166 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90262-S 1470692
9. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. JF Waljee ES Hu PA Ubel DM Smith LA Newman AK Alderman, J Clin Oncol 2008 26 3331 3337 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375 18612149
10. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. SK Al-Ghazal RW Blamey J Stewart AA Morgan, Eur J Surg Oncol 1999 25 566 570 10.1053/ejso.1999.0707 10556000
11. Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. RA Cochrane P Valasiadou ARM Wilson SK Al-Ghazal RD Macmillan, Br J Surg 2003 90 1505 1509 10.1002/bjs.4344 14648728 (Pubitemid 37533166)
12. Cosmetic outcome of breast conserving therapy after sentinel node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection. HFJ Fabry BM Zonderhuis S Meijer J Berkhof PAM Van Leeuwen JRM Van der Sijp, Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005 92 157 162 10.1007/s10549-005-0321-z 15986125 (Pubitemid 40933580)
13. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments. KC Sneeuw NK Aaronson JR Yarnold M Broderick J Regan G Ross,, et al. Radiother Oncol 1992 25 153 159 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90261-R 1470691
14. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. ME Taylor CA Perez KJ Halverson RR Kuske GW Philpott DM Garcia,, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995 31 753 764 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00480-3 7860386
15. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. C Vrieling L Collette A Fourquet WJ Hoogenraad JH Horiot JJ Jager,, et al. Radiother Oncol 2000 55 219 232 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00210-3 10869738 (Pubitemid 30408368)
16. Locoregional treatment of primary breast cancer: consensus recommendations from an International Expert Panel. M Kaufmann M Morrow G von Minckwitz JR Harris, Cancer 2010 116 1184 1191 10.1002/cncr.24874 20087962
17. Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. F Meric NQ Mirza G Vlastos TA Buchholz HM Kuerer GV Babiera,, et al. Cancer 2003 97 926 933 10.1002/cncr.11222 12569592 (Pubitemid 36173144)
18. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. CC Park M Mitsumori A Nixon A Recht J Connolly R Gelman,, et al. J Clin Oncol 2000 18 1668 1675 10764427 (Pubitemid 30220545)
19. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. SE Singletary, Am J Surg 2002 184 383 393 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01012-7 12433599 (Pubitemid 35335942)
20. Excessive resections in breast-conserving surgery: A retrospective multicentre study. NMA Krekel BM Zonderhuis S Muller H Bril HJ van Slooten ESM de Lange de Klerk,, et al. Breast J 2011 17 5
21. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. SP Harlow DN Krag SE Ames DL Weaver, J Am Coll Surg 1999 189 241 246 10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00156-8 10472923 (Pubitemid 29408859)
22. Intraoperative ultrasonography guidance is accurate and efficient according to results in 100 breast cancer patients. CS Kaufman L Jacobson B Bachman LB Kaufman, Am J Surg 2003 186 378 382 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00278-2 14553854 (Pubitemid 38368614)
23. Comparison of radioguided excision with wire localization of occult breast lesions. A Luini S Zurrida G Paganelli V Galimberti V Sacchini S Monti,, et al. Br J Surg 1999 86 522 525 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01078.x 10215829 (Pubitemid 29195051)
24. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: A feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins. FD Rahusen AH Taets van Amerongen PJ van Diest PJ Borgstein RP Bleichrodt S Meijer, J Surg Oncol 1999 72 72 76 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199910)72:2<72::AID-JSO63.0.CO;2-M 10518102 (Pubitemid 29504124)
25. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. FD Rahusen AJA Bremers HFJ Fabry AHMT van Amerongen RPA Boom S Meijer, Ann Surg Oncol 2002 9 994 998 10.1007/BF02574518 12464592 (Pubitemid 35424634)
26. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. HCJ Snider DG Morrison, Ann Surg Oncol 1999 6 308 314 10.1007/s10434-999-0308-9 10340892 (Pubitemid 29221019)
27. A comparison of three methods for nonpalpable breast cancer excision. NMA Krekel BM Zonderhuis HBAC Stockmann WH Schreurs H van der Veen ESM de Lange de Klerk,, et al. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011 37 109 115 21194880
28. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. MM Moore LA Whitney L Cerilli JZ Imbrie M Bunch VB Simpson,, et al. Ann Surg 2001 233 761 768 10.1097/00000658-200106000-00005 11371734 (Pubitemid 32494556)
29. Wiskunde, Meetkunde; A2. PHH Leijendeckers JB Fortuin F van Herwijnen GA Schwippert, Polytechnisch Zakboek Elsevier 2010 36 37
30. Quantitative and qualitative cosmetic evaluation after conservative treatment for breast cancer. V Sacchini A Luini S Tana L Lozza V Galimberti M Merson,, et al. Eur J Cancer 1991 27 1395 1400 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90019-A 1835855
31. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. C Vrieling L Collette E Bartelink JH Borger SJ Brenninkmeyer JC Horiot,, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999 45 667 676 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00215-1 10524421
32. Intraductal injection of the breast: a potential pitfall of radioisotope occult lesion localization. RS Rampaul RD Macmillan AJ Evans, Br J Radiol 2003 76 425 426 10.1259/bjr/27639166 12814931 (Pubitemid 36781037)
33. Randomized clinical trial comparing radioisotope occult lesion localization and wire-guided excision for biopsy of occult breast lesions. RS Rampaul M Bagnall H Burrell SE Pinder AJ Evans RD Macmillan, Br J Surg 2004 91 1575 1577 10.1002/bjs.4801 15505875 (Pubitemid 39619919)
34. 'Radioguided occult lesion localisation' (ROLL) for non-palpable breast lesions: a review of the relevant literature. IMC van der Ploeg M Hobbelink MAAJ van den Bosch WPT Mali IHM Borel Rinkes R van Hillegersberg, Eur J Surg Oncol 2008 34 1 5 17442531 (Pubitemid 350296759)