Navigating the language demands of an inquiry-based science performance assessment: Classroom challenges and opportunities for English learners

Science Education

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 631-651

  Lyon, Edward G ^a,b   Bunch, George C ^a   Shaw, Jerome M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862247274     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21008     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometrics issues. Educational Assessment, 8(3), 231-257.
2. Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219-234.
3. Abedi, J., Lord, C., Hofstetter, C., & Baker, E. (2000). Impact of accommodation strategies on English language learners' test performance. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(3), 16-26.
4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
5. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
6. Bailey, A. L. (Ed.). (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Ballenger, C. (1997). Social identities, moral narratives, scientific argumentation: Science talk in a bilingual classroom. Language and Education, 11(1), 1-14.
8. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50-73.
9. Brecht, R. D., & Walton, A. R. (1994). National strategic planning in the less commonly taught languages. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 532(1), 190-212.
10. Brown, B. (2006). "Isn't no slang that can be said about this stuff": Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96-126.
11. Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779-802.
12. Bunch, G. C. (2009). "Going up there": Challenges and opportunities for language minority students during a mainstream classroom speech event. Linguistics and Education, 20(2), 81-108.
13. Bunch, G. C., Shaw, J. M., & Geaney, E. R. (2010). Documenting the language demands of mainstream content-area assessment for English learners: Participant structures, communicative modes and genre in science performance assessments. Language and Education, 24(3), 185-214.
14. Cazden, C. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432-463). New York: Macmillan.
15. Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337-357.
17. Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape. Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P.B. Elmac (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177-192). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teacher's College Press.
19. Garcia, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Gottlieb, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 647-664). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
23. Johnson, E., & Monroe, B. (2004). Simplified language as an accommodation on math tests. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29(3), 35-45.
24. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Lee, O. (1999). Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 83-115.
26. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English-language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12-21.
27. Lee, O., Santau, A., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2010). Science and literacy assessments with English language learners. In M. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 254-274). New York: Routledge.
28. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333-368.
30. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
31. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. Educational Measurement, 3(1), 13-103.
33. Moschovich, J. D. (July, 2006). Using video to document mathematical activity among bilingual/multilingual learners. Paper presented in a pre-conference meeting of the Multilingual Mathematics Classrooms Group, Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic.
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011. Indicator 6: Children who spoke a language other than English at home. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 30, 2011, from.
35. National Research Council. (2001). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. J. Myron Atkin, P. Black, & J. Coffey (Eds.), Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. National Science Resources Center. (1991). Microworlds teacher's guide. Burlington, NC: Carolina Biological Supply.
37. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (1996). Standards for foreign language learning: Preparing for the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
38. O'Malley, J. M., & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley.
39. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.
40. Philips, S. U. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in the community and classroom. In C.B. Cazden, V. P. John, and D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Renshaw, P., & Brown, A. J. (2007). Formats of classroom talk for integrating everyday and scientific discourse: Replacement, interweaving, contextual privileging and pastiche. Language and Education, 21(6), 531-549.
42. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D., & Poggio, J. (2006). The impact of language characteristics in mathematics test items on the performance of English language learners and students with disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 105-126.
44. Shaw, J. M., Bunch, G. C., & Geaney, E. R. (2010). Analyzing language demands facing English learners on science performance assessments: Development and use of the SALD framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 909-928.
45. Siegel, M. A. (2007). Striving for equitable classroom assessments for linguistic minorities: Strategies for and effects of revising life science items. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 864-881.
46. Solano-Flores, G. (2010). Assessing the cultural validity of assessment practices: An introduction. In M. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.), Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity (pp. 3-21). New York: Routledge.
47. Solano-Flores, G., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2001). On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 553-573.
48. Solórzano, R. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260-329.
49. STEP-uP (Science Teacher Enhancement Program unifying the Pikes Peak Region). (2005). Embedded assessment package for microworlds. Colorado Springs, CO: Author.
50. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687.
51. Stoddart, T., Solis, J., Tolbert, S., & Bravo, M. (2010). Effective science teaching for English language learners. In D. Sunal & C. Sunal (Eds.). Teaching science with Hispanic ELLs in K-16 classrooms (pp. 151-181). Albany NY: Information Age Publishing.
52. Tellez, K., & Waxman, H. (2004). Quality teachers for English language learners: A research synthesis. Philadelphia: Mid-Atlantic Laboratory for Student Success, Publication Series.
53. Valdés, G., Bunch, G., Snow, C., Lee, & Matos, L. (2005). Enhancing the development of students' language(s). In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 126-168). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Valdés, G., & Geoffrion-Vinci, M. (1998). Chicano Spanish: The problem of the "underdeveloped" code in bilingual repertoires. Modern Language Journal, 82(iv), 473-501.
55. Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 160-195). London: Cassell.
56. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Walqui, A., & van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
58. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
59. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1978). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
61. Zwiers, J. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.