Metacognition and spelling performance in college students

Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 367-394

  Vanderswalmen, Ruth ^a   Vrijders, Joke ^b   Desoete, Annemie ^a,b  

^a Arteveldehogeschool   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862214972     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_17     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 31-46.
2. Artzt, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137-175.
3. Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453 - 481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Reiner & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). Learning styles: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427 - 441.
6. Carlisle, J. F. (1994). Morphological awareness, spelling, and story writing: Possible relationships for elementary-age children with and without learning disabilities. In N. C. Jordan & J. Goldsmith-Philips (Eds.), Learning disabilities: New directions for assessment and intervention (pp. 123-145). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Claes, B., & Moeyaert, S. (2003). Opstelling en aanzet tot normering van een instaptoets spelling voor beginnende logopediestudenten [Setting up of and encouragement to standardise an entry test in spelling for new logopaedics students]. Tijdschrift voor Logopedie & Audiologie, 33(4), 157-166.
8. Defior, S., Jimenez-Fernandez, G., & Serrano, F. (2009). Complexity and lexical effects on the acquisition of Spanish spelling. Learning and Instruction, 19, 55-65.
9. Dermitzaki, I., & Efklides, A. (2003). Goal orientations and their effect on self-concept and metacognition in adolescence. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, 10, 214-227.
10. Desoete, A. (2007a). Evaluating and improving the mathematics teaching-learning process through metacognition. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 705-730.
11. Desoete, A. (2007b). Students with mathematical disabilities in Belgium: From definition, classification and assessment to STICORDI device. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioural disabilities: Vol. 20. International perspectives (pp. 181-222). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
12. Desoete, A. (2008). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 189-206.
13. Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Metacognitive macroevaluations in mathematical problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 16, 12-25.
14. Desoete, A., & Veenman, M. (Eds.). (2006). Metacognition in mathematics education. New York: NOVA.
15. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation, and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgments, and their interrelations. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19-34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14.
18. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287.
19. Efklides, A., & Sideridis, G. D. (2009). Assessing cognitive failures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 69-72.
20. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Review and commentary: Stages of spelling development. In S. Templeton, & D. R. Bear (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 307-332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
23. Gauderis, K., Heirman, E., & Vandenhoof, T. (2004). Normering van AT-GSN, TTR en CDR-5 bij leerlingen van het zesde jaar Algemeen Secundair Onderwijs [Standardisation of AT-GSN, TTR and CDR-5 among sixth-year students in General Secondary Education]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University College Arteveldehogeschool, Ghent, Belgium.
24. Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192-200.
25. Ghesquière, P. (1998). Algemene toets gevorderde spelling van het Nederlands (AT-GSN), verantwoording en handleiding. Rapport van een specialisatiejaar: onderzoek AT-GSN-dictee [General Test in Dutch Advanced Spelling (AT-GSN), justification and manual. Report of a specialisation year: study on AT-GSN dictation]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Leuven, Belgium.
26. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 119-136.
27. Grezel, J. E. (2007). Die spelfouten maken toch niets uit? Zorgen over taalvaardigheid van studenten [So those spelling errors don't matter? Concerns about students' language skills]. Onze Taal, 76, 148-151.
28. Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154-172). New York: Routledge.
29. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Brindle, M., & Sandmel, K. (2009). Metacognition and children's writing. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 131-153). New York: Routledge.
30. Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Henderson, E. H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In S. Templeton & D. R. Bears (Eds.), Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Henderson, E. H., & Beers, J. W. (1980). Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell: A reflection of word knowledge. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Herbots, K. (2005, October, 27). Een op de drie studenten kan niet zonder fouten schrijven [One in every three students cannot write without mistakes]. De Morgen. Retrieved July 6, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www. standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=dmf27102005-002.
34. Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22 (3 & 4), 255-278.
35. Keuning, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2008). Spelling development throughout the elementary grades: The Dutch case. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 459-470.
36. Kleijnen, R. (1992). Hardnekkige spellingfouten. Een taalkundige analyse [Persistent spelling mistakes. A linguistic analysis]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
37. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289-325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kruger, J. (2002). Unskilled and unaware - but why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 82, 189-192.
39. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
40. Landed, K., Thaler, V., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Spelling pronunciations: Transforming irregularity into regularity. Learning and Instruction, 18, 295-308.
41. Lin, L.-M., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345-391.
42. Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship? Mathematical Cognition, 3, 121-139.
43. Montague, M. (1998). Research on metacognition in special education. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioural disabilities (pp. 151-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
44. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 23, 125-141.
45. Nist, S. L., Simpson, M. L., & Olejnik, S. (1991). The relation between self-selected study processes and test performance. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 849-874.
46. Otero, J., Campanario, J. M., & Hopkins, K. D. (1992). The relationship between academic achievement and metacognitive comprehension monitoring ability of Spanish secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 419-430.
47. Pressley, M. (2000). Development of grounded theories of complex cognitive processing: Exhaustive within- and between study analyses of thinking-aloud data. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 262-296). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
48. Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: Looking for connections through students' work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101, 236-245.
49. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice and change in children's strategy use. Child Development, 70, 332-348.
50. Savolainen, H., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Tolvanen, A., & Holopainen, L. (2008). Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education, Learning and Instruction, 18, 201
51. Schraw, G., Potenza, M. T., & Nebelsick-Gullet, L. (1993). Constraints on the calibration of performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 455-463.
52. Sénéchal, M., Basque, M. T., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children's spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231-254.
53. Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71, 26-35.
54. Sinkavich, F. J. (1995). Performance and metamemory: Do students know what they don't know? Instructional Psychology, 22, 77-87.
55. Soenens, D. (2002, May 8). Een nul voor Nederlands [They failed Dutch]. Knack. Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79.
56. Steffler, D. J., Varnhagen, C. K., & Friesen, C. K. (1998). There are more to children's spelling than the errors they make: Strategic and automatic processes for one-syllable words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 492-505.
57. Templeton, S., & Bear, D. R. (Eds.). (1992). Development of orthographic knowledge and the foundations of literacy: A memorial festschrift for Edmund H. Henderson. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Templeton, S., & Morris, D. (2000). Spelling. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, D. P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 525-543). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2000). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 147-222). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
60. Van Bon, W. H. J., & Uit De Haag, I. J. C. A. F. (1997). Difficulties with consonants in the spelling and segmentation of CCVCC pseudowords: Differentiation among Dutch first graders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 363-386.
61. Van Kraayenoord, C. E., & Schneider, W. E. (1999). Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grade 3 and 4. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 305-324.
62. Veenman, M. V. J. (2003, August). The assessment of metacognitive skills: What can be learned from multi-method designs? Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
63. Veenman, M. V. J., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2004). Intellectual and metacognitive skills of novices while studying texts under conditions of text difficulty and time constraint. Learning and Instruction, 14, 619-638.
64. Veenman, M. V. J., & Elshout, J. J. (1999). Changes in the relation between cognitive and metacognitive skills during the acquisition of expertise. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 509-523.
65. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning. Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14.
66. Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Learnability of graphotactic rules in visual word identification. Learning and Instruction, 16, 538-548.
67. Vlaamse Onderwijs Raad. (2006). De lat hoog voor talen in iedere school. Goed voor de sterken, sterk voor de zwakken [High standards for languages in every school. Good for the best, tough for the weaker ones]. Retrieved December 7, 2006, from the World Wide Web: http://www. ond.vlaanderen.be
68. Vrijders, J., Vanderswalmen, R., & Beeckman, A. (2007). Tien vragen over de spelling van studenten Hoger Onderwijs [Ten questions about the spelling of higher education students]. Logopedie, 20(4), 77-88.
69. Wakely, M. B., Hooper, S. R., de Kruif, R. E. L., & Swartz, C. (2006). Subtypes of written expression in elementary school children: A linguistic-based model. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 125-159.
70. Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10, 268-288.
71. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
72. Zimmerman, B., & Reisemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73-101.