Using CRISP to model global characteristics of fixation durations in scene viewing and reading with a common mechanism

Visual Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 4-5, 2012, Pages 457-494

  Nuthmann, Antje ^a   Henderson, John M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational modelling; Eye movements; Fixation durations; Reading; Saccadic inhibition; Scene perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED RANDOM-WALK WITH INHIBITION FOR SACCADE PLANNING MODEL; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SCENE VIEWING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84862177925     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.670142     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Andrews, T. J. and Coppola, D. M. 1999. Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments. Vision Research, 39: 2947-2953.
2. Becker, W. and Jürgens, R. 1979. An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19: 1967-1983.
3. Castelhano, M. S. and Henderson, J. M. 2008. Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62: 1-14.
4. De Graef, P. and Germeys, F. 2003. Reading the scene: Application of E-Z Reader to object and scene perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26: 479-480.
5. Engbert, R., Longtin, A. and Kliegl, R. 2002. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42: 621-636.
6. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M. and Kliegl, R. 2005. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112: 777-813.
7. Findlay, J. M. and Walker, R. 1999. A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 661-721.
8. Henderson, J. M. 2003. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 498-504.
9. Henderson, J. M. 2007. Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16: 219-222.
10. Henderson, J. M. 2011. "Eye movements and scene perception". In The Oxford handbook of eye movements, Edited by: Gilchrist, I. D., Liversedge, S. P. and Everling, S. 593-606. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Henderson, J. M. and Ferreira, F. 1990. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16: 417-429.
12. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. 1998. "Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview". In Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, Edited by: Underwood, G. 269-293. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
13. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. 1999. The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10: 438-443.
14. Henderson, J. M. and Hollingworth, A. 2003. Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 65: 58-71.
15. Henderson, J. M. and Pierce, G. L. 2008. Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15: 566-573.
16. Henderson, J. M. and Smith, T. J. 2009. How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm. Visual Cognition, 17: 1055-1082.
17. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A. and Hollingworth, A. 1999. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 210-228.
18. Hollingworth, A. and Henderson, J. M. 2002. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28: 113-136.
19. Inhoff, A. W. and Rayner, K. 1986. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 40: 431-439.
20. Itti, L. and Koch, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40: 1489-1506.
21. Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87: 329-354.
22. Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. 2006. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135: 12-35.
23. Loftus, G. R. 1985. Picture perception: Effects of luminance on available information and information-extraction rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114: 342-356.
24. Mannan, S., Ruddock, K. H. and Wooding, D. S. 1995. Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spatial Vision, 9: 363-386.
25. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D. and Zola, D. 1988. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28(10): 245-253.
26. McConkie, G. W. and Rayner, K. 1975. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17: 578-586.
27. Morrison, R. E. 1984. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10: 667-682.
28. Navalpakkam, V. and Itti, L. 2005. Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45: 205-231.
29. Nuthmann, A. and Engbert, R. 2009. Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49: 322-336.
30. Nuthmann, A. and Henderson, J. M. 2010. Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. Journal of Vision, 10: 1-19.
31. Nuthmann, A., Smith, T. J., Engbert, R. and Henderson, J. M. 2010. CRISP: A computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing. Psychological Review, 117: 382-405.
32. Parkhurst, D., Culurciello, E. and Niebur, E. 2000. "Evaluating variable resolution displays with visual search: Task performance and eye movements". In Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000, Edited by: Duchowski, A. T. 105-109. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
33. Parkhurst, D., Law, K. and Niebur, E. 2002. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42: 107-123.
34. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J. and Zhang, S. B. 2002. Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109: 472-491.
35. Ratcliff, R. and Rouder, J. N. 1998. Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9: 347-356.
36. Rayner, K. 1979. Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8(1): 21-30.
37. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124: 372-422.
38. Rayner, K. 2009a. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62: 1457-1506.
39. Rayner, K. 2009b. Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2: 1-10.
40. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S. A. 1986. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14: 191-201.
41. Rayner, K., Li, X., Williams, C. C., Cave, K. R. and Well, A. D. 2007. Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 47: 2714-2726.
42. Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. 1981. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A: 351-373.
43. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C. and Raney, G. E. 1996. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22: 1188-1200.
44. Reddi, B. A. J., Asrress, K. N. and Carpenter, R. H. S. 2003. Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90: 3538-3546.
45. Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A. and Rayner, K. 2009. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13: 115-119.
46. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L. and Rayner, K. 1998. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105: 125-157.
47. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. 2003. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26: 445-526.
48. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. 2012. Eye movements in reading versus non-reading tasks: Using E-Z Reader to understand the role of word/stimulus familiarity. Visual Cognition, 20, 360 390.
49. Reichle, E. D., Warren, T. and McConnell, K. 2009. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16: 1-21.
50. Reingold, E. M. and Stampe, D. M. 2002. Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14: 371-388.
51. Reingold, E. M. and Stampe, D. M. 2003. "Using the saccadic inhibition paradigm to investigate saccadic control in reading". In The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements, Edited by: Hyönä, J., Radach, R. and Deubel, H. 347-360. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
52. Reingold, E. M. and Stampe, D. M. 2004. Saccadic inhibition in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30: 194-211.
53. Reingold, E. M., Yang, J. M. and Rayner, K. 2010. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: Evidence for lexical control of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36: 1677-1683.
54. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K. and Clark, J. J. 1997. To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5): 368-373.
55. Roitman, J. D. and Shadlen, M. N. 2002. Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(21): 9475-9489.
56. Ross, J., Morrone, M. C., Goldberg, M. E. and Burr, D. C. 2001. Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences, 24: 113-121.
57. Saida, S. and Ikeda, M. 1979. Useful visual field size for pattern perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 25: 119-125.
58. Schad, D., & Engbert, R. 2012. The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391 420.
59. Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K. and Posner, M. I. 1998. Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 9: 2195-2200.
60. Shioiri, S. 1993. Postsaccadic processing of the retinal image during picture scanning. Perception and Psychophysics, 53: 305-314.
61. Simons, D. J. 2000. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 147-155.
62. Sivanandam, S. N. and Deepa, S. N. 2007. Introduction to genetic algorithms, Berlin, Germany: Springer.
63. Staub, A., White, S. J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E. C. and Rayner, K. 2010. Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36: 1280-1293.
64. Tatler, B. W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F. and Ballard, D. H. 2011. Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11: 1-23.
65. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S. and Henderson, J. M. 2006. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113: 766-786.
66. Trukenbrod, H. A., & Engbert, R. 2011. ICAT: A computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
67. Underwood, G. 2009. Cognitive processes in eye guidance: Algorithms for attention in image processing. Cognitive Computation, 1: 64-76.
68. van Diepen, P. M. J., Wampers, M. and d'Ydewalle, G. 1998. "Functional division of the visual field: Moving masks and moving windows". In Eye guidance in reading and scene perception, Edited by: Underwood, G. 337-355. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
69. Vergilino-Perez, D., Collins, T. and Doré-Mazars, K. 2004. Decision and metrics of refixations in reading isolated words. Vision Research, 44: 2009-2017.
70. Võ, M. L.-H. and Henderson, J. M. 2009. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9: 1-15.
71. Wang, H.-C., Hwang, A. D. and Pomplun, M. 2010. Object frequency and predictability effects on eye fixation durations in real-world scene viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3: 1-10.
72. Yang, S.-N. 2009. Effects of gaze-contingent text changes on fixation duration in reading. Vision Research, 49: 2843-2855.
73. Yang, S.-N. and McConkie, G. W. 2001. Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times. Vision Research, 41: 3567-3585.
74. Zelinsky, G. J. 2008. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115: 787-835.
75. Zelinsky, G. J. 2012. TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search. Visual Cognition, 20, 515 545.