Relocation Programs, Opportunities to Learn, and the Complications of Conversion

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 131-178

  Johnson, Odis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement gap; Black education; educational policy; policy; program evaluation; social class; social context; sociology; urban education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862177790     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654312449489     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Acevedo-Garcia D.,McArdle N.,Osypuk T.,Lefkowitz B.,Krimgold B.Children left behind: How metropolitan areas are failing America's children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University School of Public Health; 2007:.
2. Acevedo-Garcia D.,Osypuk T.,Werbel R.,Meara E.,Cutler D.,Berkman L.Does housing mobility policy improve health?.Housing Policy Debate. 2004;15:49-98.
3. Ainsworth J.Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement.Social Forces. 2002;81:117-152.
4. Armor D. J.School desegregation in the 21st century. Rossell C. H.Armor D. J.Walberg H. J., ed. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2002:323-32.
5. BifulcoR. (2005). District-level Black-White funding disparities in the United States, 1987-2002. Journal of Education Finance, 31, 172-194. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/pss/40704258.
6. Bowen G.,Rose R.,Powers J.,Glennie E.The joint effects of neighborhoods, schools, peers, and families on changes in the school success of middle school students.Family Relations. 2008;57:504-516.
7. Bowen N.,Bowen G.Effects of crime and violence in neighborhoods and schools on the school behavior and performance of adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research. 1999;14:319-342.
8. Bowen N.,Bowen G.,Ware W.Neighborhood social disorganization, families, and the educational behavior of adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research. 2002;17:468-490.
9. BoydM.EdinK.DuncanG.Clampet-LundquistS. (2006, March). The durability of the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from http://paa2006.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=61724.
10. Briggs X.Moving up versus moving out: Neighborhood effects in housing mobility programs.Housing Policy Debate. 1997;8:195-234.
11. Briggs X.Brown kids in White suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital.Housing Policy Debate. 1998;9:177-221.
12. Briggs X.,Darden J.,Aidala A.In the wake of desegregation. Early impacts of scattered-site housing on neighborhoods in Yonkers, New York.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65:27-49.
13. Briggs X.,Ferryman K.,Popkin S.,Rendon M.Why did the moving to opportunity experiment not get young people into better schools?.Housing Policy Debate. 2008;19:53-91.
14. Brooks-Gunn J.,Klebanov P.,Smith J.,Duncan G.,Lee K.The Black-White test score gap in young children: Contributions of test and family characteristics.Applied Developmental Science. 2003;7:239-252.
15. Bryk A.,Lee V.,Holland P.Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
16. Bryk A. S.,Raudenbush S.Toward a more appropriate conceptualization of research on school effects: A three-level hierarchical linear model.American Journal of Education. 1988;97:65-108.
17. Bryk A. S.,Schneider B.Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2002:.
18. Carlson D.,Borman G.,Robinson M.A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2011;33:378-398.
19. Caughy M.,O'Campo P.Neighborhood poverty, social capital, and the cognitive development of African American preschoolers.American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;37:141-154.
20. Chase-Lansdale P. L.,Gordon R. A.Economic hardship and the development of five- and six-year-olds: Neighborhood and regional perspectives.Child Development. 1996;67:3338-3367.
21. Clampet-Lundquist S.HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties.Housing Policy Debate. 2004;15:415-447.
22. Clampet-Lundquist S.No more "Bois ball"-The effect of relocation from public housing on adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research. 2007;22:298-323.
23. Clampet-Lundquist S.,Massey D.Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: A reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity experiment.American Journal of Sociology. 2008;114:107-143.
24. ClarkW. (2008). Reexamining the Moving to Opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration. Demography, 45, 515-535. Retrieved from www.agilentmanuals.pubget.com/paper/18939659.
25. Coleman J. S.,Campbell E. Q.,Hobson D. J.,McPartland J.,Mood A. M.,Weinfeld F. D.,York R. L.Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare; 1966:.
26. CooleyJ. (2010). Desegregation and the achievement gap: Do diverse peers help? (WCER Working Paper 2010-3). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jcooley/CooleyDeseg.pdf.
27. Crain R. L.,Mahard R.School racial composition and Black college attendance and achievement test performance.Sociology of Education. 1978;51:81-101.
28. Crane J.The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing.American Journal of Sociology. 1991;96:1226-1259.
29. Currie J.,Yelowitz A.Are public housing projects good for kids?.Journal of Public Economics. 2000;75:99-124.
30. Darling N.,Steinberg L.Neighborhood poverty: Policy implications in studying neighborhoods. Brooks-Gunn J.Duncan G. J.Aber J. L., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997:120-131.
31. DeLuca S.,Dayton E.Switching social contexts: The effects of housing mobility and school choice programs on youth outcomes.Annual Review of Sociology. 2009;35:457-491.
32. Deluca S.,Rosenblatt P.Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program.Teachers College Record. 2010;112:1443-1491.
33. DonahueP. L.DaaneM.JinY. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2003. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2003/2005453.asp.
34. Dreeben R.,Gamoran A.Race, instruction and learning.American Sociological Review. 1986;51:660-669.
35. Duncan G. J.,Connell J. P.,Klebanov P. K.Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. Brooks-Gunn J.Duncan G. J.Aber J. L., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997:219-250.
36. DuncanG. (2008). New lessons from Gautreaux and Moving to Opportunity residential mobility programs. Irvine, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://merage.uci.edu/ResearchAndCenters/CRE/Resources/Documents/Duncan.pdf.
37. Durlauf S. N.Understanding poverty. Danziger S.Haveman R., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2001:392-416.
38. Fauth R. C.,Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.Early impacts of moving from poor to middle-class neighborhoods on low-income youth.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2005;26:415-39.
39. Fauth R.,Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.Welcome to the neighborhood? Long-term impacts on moving to low-poverty neighborhoods on poor children's and adolescents' outcomes.Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2007;17:249-284.
40. Fauth R. C.,Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.Seven years later: Effects of a neighborhood mobility program on poor Black and Latino adults' well-being.Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2008;49:119-130.
41. Fischer P. B.Is housing mobility an effective anti-poverty strategy? An examination of the Cincinnati experience. Lake Forest, IL: Lake Forest College; 1991:.
42. Foster E. M.,McLanahan S.An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person's chance of finishing high school?.Psychological Methods. 1996;1:249-260.
43. FryerR.LevittS. (2005). The Black-White test score gap through third grade (NBER Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w11049.
44. GallagherM.BajajB. (2007). Moving on: Benefits and challenges of HOPE VI for children. Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, 4, 1-9. Retrieved from www.urban.org/url.cfm?id=311488.
45. Galster G.,Hill E.The metropolis in Black and White. Galster G.Hill E., ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research; 1992:1-19.
46. Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority, 269 F. Supp. 907.
47. GoetzE. (2002). Hollman v. Cisneros:Deconcentrating poverty in Minneapolis. The experiences of dispersed families, Report 6. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Urban and Regional Affairs. Retrieved from www.cura.umn.edu/publications/catalog/h1026.
48. Goetz E. G.Clearing the way: De-concentrating the poor in urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2003:.
49. Goetz E. G.Desegregation lawsuits and public housing dispersal-The case of Hollman v. Cisneros in Minneapolis.Journal of the American Planning Association. 2004;70:282-299.
50. Goetz E. G.,Chapple K.You gotta' move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal.Housing Policy Debate. 2010;20:209-236.
51. Gonzales N. A.,Cauce A. M.,Friedman R. J.,Mason C. A.Family, peer, and neighborhood influences on academic achievement among African-American adolescents: One-year prospective effects.American Journal of Community Psychology. 1996;24:365-387.
52. Granovetter M.Threshold models of collective behavior.American Journal of Sociology. 1978;83:1420-1443.
53. Hagan J.,MacMillan R.,Wheaton B.New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children.American Sociological Review. 1996;61:368-385.
54. HanrattyM.McLanahanS.PettitB. (1998). The impact of the Los Angeles Moving to Opportunity program on residential mobility, neighborhood characteristics, and early Child and parent outcomes. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing. Retrieved from http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/wp98-18-Hanratty.pdf.
55. Hanushek E. A.Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1997;19:141-164.
56. Harding D.Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy.American Journal of Sociology. 2003;109:676-719.
57. Hollman v. Cisneros, No. 4-92-712 (1995).
58. HolzmanM. (2004). Public education and Black male students: A state report card. Cambridge, MA: Schott Foundation for Public Education. Retrieved from www.schottfoundation.org/publications-reports/.
59. Hutchins v. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority, No. C1-79-131 (1984).
60. Jackson L.,Langille L.,Lyons R.,Hughes J.,Martin D.,Winstanley V.Does moving from a high-poverty to lower-poverty neighborhood improve mental health? A realist review of "Moving to Opportunity.".Health & Place. 2009;15:961-970.
61. Jacob B.Public housing, housing vouchers and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago.American Economic Review. 2004;94:233-258.
62. Jargowsky P. A.Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios and the American city. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997:.
63. Jencks C.,Mayer S. E.Inner-city poverty in the United States. Lynn L. E.McGeary M. G. H., ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990:111-186.
64. Johnson M. P.,Ladd H. F.,Ludwig J.The benefits and costs of residential mobility programs for the poor.Housing Studies. 2002;17:125-138.
65. Johnson O.Ecology in educational theory: Thoughts on ecology, stratification and proximal capital.Urban Review. 2008a;40:227-246.
66. JohnsonO. (2008b). Who benefits from concentrated affluence? A synthesis of neighborhood effects considering race, gender and education outcomes. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 14, 85-112. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/jpmsp.com/www/volume14issue.
67. Johnson O.Assessing neighborhood racial segregation and macroeconomic effects in the education of African Americans.Review of Educational Research. 2010;80:527-575.
68. Johnson O.A systematic review of neighborhood and institutional relationships related to education.Education and Urban Society. 2011;43:1-35.
69. Kasarda J.The changing faces of the suburbs. Schwartz B., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1976:113-136.
70. Katz L. F.,Kling J.,Liebman J.Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early results of a randomized mobility experiment.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2001;116:607-654.
71. Kaufman J.,Rosenbaum J.The education and employment of low-income Black youth in white suburbs.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1992;14:229-240.
72. Keels M.Neighborhood effects examined through the lens of residential mobility programs.American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008;42:235-250.
73. Kingsley G. T.,Pettit K. L.Neighborhood change in urban America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 2003:.
74. Klebanov P. K.,Brooks-Gunn J.,Chase-Lansdale P. L.,Gordon R. A.Neighborhood poverty: Context and consequences for children. Brooks-Gunn J.Duncan G. J.Aber J. L., ed. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997:119-145.
75. Kling J. R.,Liebman J. B.,Katz L. F.Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects.Econometrica. 2007;75:83-119.
76. Ladd H. F.,Ludwig J.Federal housing assistance, residential relocation, and educational opportunities: Evidence from Baltimore.American Economic Review. 1997;87:272-277.
77. Ladd H. F.,Ludwig J.Choosing a better life: Evaluating the Moving to Opportunity social experiment. Goering J.Feins J., ed. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press; 2003:117-152.
78. Lee V.,Burkham D.Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; 2002:.
79. Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes.Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:309-337.
80. Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.A randomized study of neighborhood effects on low-income children's educational outcomes.Developmental Psychology. 2004;40:488-507.
81. Leventhal T.,Brooks-Gunn J.Neighborhood and gender effects on family processes: Results from the Moving to Opportunity program.Family Relations. 2005;54:633-643.
82. Leventhal T.,Fauth R.,Brooks-Gunn J.Neighborhood poverty and public policy: A 5-year follow-up of children's educational outcomes in the New York City Moving to Opportunity demonstration.Developmental Psychology. 2005;41:933-952.
83. Lopez-Turley R.Is relative deprivation beneficial: The effects of richer and poorer neighborhoods.Journal of Community Psychology. 2002;30:671-686.
84. Ludwig J.,Ladd H.,Duncan G.Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs. Gale W.Pack J., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2001:147-201.
85. Ludwig J.,Liebman J.,Kling J.,Duncan G.,Katz L.,Kessler R.,Sanbonmatsu L.What can we learn about neighborhood effects from the Moving to Opportunity experiment?.American Journal of Sociology. 2008;114:144-188.
86. MacLeod J.Ain't no makin it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1995:.
87. Madyun N.,Lee M.Community influences on E/BD student achievement.Education and Urban Society. 2008;40:307-328.
88. Manguson K.,Duncan G.The role of family socioeconomic resources in the Black-White test score gap among young children.Developmental Review. 2006;26:365-399.
89. Massey D. S.Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and families. Booth A.Crouter A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:41-48.
90. Massey D. S.,Denton N. A.American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993:.
91. Massey D. S.,Fischer M. J.Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs. Gale W. G.Pack J. R., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2003:1-40.
92. Mazmanian D. A.,Sabatier P.Implementation and public policy. New York, NY: University Press of America; 1989:.
93. MeadN.SandeneB. (2007). The nation's report card: U.S. Economics 2006. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2006/2007475.pdf.
94. Mendenhall R.,DeLuca S.,Duncan G.Neighborhood resources, racial segregation, and economic mobility: Results from the Gautreaux program.Social Science Research. 2006;35:892-923.
95. Mincy R.Black males left behind. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2004:.
96. Nash J.Neighborhood effects on sense of school coherence and educational behavior in students at risk of school failure.Social Work in Education. 2002;24:73-89.
97. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006 (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006071.pdf.
98. O'Connor C.Coping with poverty: The social contexts of neighborhood, work, and family in the African-American community. Danziger S.Lin A., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2000:105-140.
99. Orfield G.,Eaton S. E.New York, NY: The New Press; 1996:.
100. OrrL.FeinsJ.JacobR.BeecroftE.SanbonmatsuL.Katz L.KlingJ. (2003). Moving to Opportunity for fair housing: Interim impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from www.areuea.org/conferences/papers/47/469.pdf.
101. Oswald D.,Coutinho M.,Best A.Racial inequity in special education. Losen D.Orfield G., ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2002:1-13.
102. Pattillo M.Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the Black middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1999:.
103. Pattillo M.Black on the block: The politics of race and class in the city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007:.
104. PeroffK. A.DavisC. L.JonesR. (1979). Gautreaux housing demonstration: An evaluation of its impact on participating households. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/other/gautreaux_housing_demon.html.
105. Plybon L.,Edwards L.,Butler D.,Belgrave F.,Allison K.Examining the link between neighborhood cohesion and school outcomes: The role of support coping among African American adolescent girls.Journal of Black Psychology. 2003;29:393-407.
106. Polikoff A.Waiting for Gautreaux: A story of segregation, housing, and the Black ghetto. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press; 2006:.
107. Pong S.,Hao L.Neighborhood and school factors in the school performance of immigrant children.International Migration Review. 2007;41:206-241.
108. Popkin S. J.Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. Bennett L.Smith J.Wright P. A., ed. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2006:68-90.
109. Popkin S. J.A glass half empty? New evidence from the HOPE VI Panel Study.Housing Policy Debate. 2010;20:43-63.
110. PopkinS. J.EisemanM.CoveE. (2004). How are HOPE VI families faring? Children, report 6. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center, Urban Institute. Retrieved from www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/411074_Roof_6.pdf.
111. PopkinS. J.HarrisL. E.CunninghamM. K. (2002). Families in transition: A qualitative analysis of the MTO experience, final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved from www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/mtoqualf.pdf.
112. PribeshS.DowneyD. B. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance?Demography, 36, 521-534. Retrieved from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10604079.
113. RampeyB. D.DionG. S.DonahueP. (2009). The nation's report card: Trends in academic progress in reading and mathematics 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2008/2009479.asp.
114. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A.Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2002:.
115. Rosenbaum E.,Harris L. E.Low-income families in their new neighborhoods: The short-term effects of moving from Chicago's public housing.Journal of Family Issues. 2001;22:183-210.
116. Rosenbaum J. E.Black pioneers: Do their moves to the suburbs increase economic opportunity for mothers and children.Housing Policy Debate. 1991;2:1179-1213.
117. Rosenbaum J. E.Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program.Housing Policy Debate. 1995;6:231-269.
118. Rosenbaum J. E.,Kulieke M. J.,Rubinowitz L. S.White suburban schools' responses to low-income Black children: Sources of successes and problems.The Urban Review. 1988;20:28-41.
119. Rosenbaum J. E.,Zuberi A.Comparing residential mobility programs: design elements, neighborhood placements, and outcomes in MTO and Gautreaux.Housing Policy Debate. 2010;20:27-41.
120. Rosenholtz S.Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 1991:.
121. Rossi P. H.,Lipsey M. W.,Freeman H. E.Evaluation: A systematic approach. 2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (6th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2004:.
122. Sacerdote B.Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2001;116:681-704.
123. Sampson R.Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure.American Journal of Sociology. 2008;114:189-231.
124. Sampson R.,Sharkey P.,Raudenbush S.Durable effects of concentrated disadvantage on verbal ability among African American children.Proceedings of the National Academies of Science. 2008;105:845-852.
125. Sanbonmatsu L.,Kling J.,Duncan G.,Brooks-Gunn J.Neighborhoods and academic achievement: Results from the Moving to Opportunity experiment.Journal of Human Resources. 2006;41:650-691.
126. Saporito S.,Sohoni D.Mapping educational inequality: Concentrations of poverty among poor and minority students in public schools.Social Forces. 2007;85:1227-1253.
127. ShlayA.HolupkaC. (1991). An evaluation of Baltimore City's Lafayette Courts Family Development Center: Preliminary findings. In NAHRO-APWA (Eds.). Family self-sufficiency: Linking housing, public welfare, and human services (pp. 101-107). Washington, DC: National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials. Retrieved from astro.temple.edu/~ashlay/vitanov10.doc.
128. Snell E. K.,Duncan G. J.Child characteristics and successful use of housing vouchers: Estimates from the Moving to Opportunity demonstration.Housing Policy Debate. 2006;17:727-754.
129. Sobel M. E.What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate? Causal inference in the face of interference.Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2006;101:1398-1407.
130. Solon G.,Page M.,Duncan G.Correlations between neighboring children in their subsequent educational attainment.The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2000;82:383-392.
131. Sorensen A. B.,Hallinan M.The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes. Peterson P. L.Wilkinson L. C.Hallinan M., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1984:.
132. SwanstromT.RyanR.StigersK. (2006). Measuring concentrated poverty. Did it really decline during the 1990s. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from www.iurd.berkeley.edu/publications/wp/2007-09.pdf.
133. United States v. Yonkers Board of Education, 624 F.Supp. 1276 (S.D.N.Y. 1985).
134. National urban policy report. Washington, DC: Author; 1995:.
135. Varady D. P.,Walker C. C.Housing vouchers and residential mobility.Journal of Planning Literature. 2003;18:17-30.
136. Venkatesh S.American project: The rise and fall of an American ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002:.
137. Wacquant L.Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1997;2:341-355.
138. Wilson W. J.The truly disadvantaged: The inner-city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1987:.
139. Wilson W. J.When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Vintage; 1996:.
140. WirtJ.ChoyS.RooneyP.ProvasnikS.SenA.TobinR. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004077.pdf.
141. Zuberi A.Limited exposure: Children's activities and neighborhood effects in the Gautreaux two housing mobility program.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2010;32:405-423.