Reexamining the moving to opportunity study and its contribution to changing the distribution of poverty and ethnic concentration

Demography

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 515-535

  Clark, William A V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049184656     PISSN: 00703370     EISSN: 15337790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0022     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Briggs, X. 1998. "Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Many Faces of Social Capital." Housing Policy Debate 9:177-221.
2. Briggs, X. ed. 2005. The Geography of Opportunity Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
3. Clark, W.A.V. 2005. "Intervening in the Residential Mobility Process: Neighborhood Outcomes for Low-Income Populations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:15307-312.
4. Clark, W.A.V. and F. Dieleman. 1996. Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
5. Galster, G. 2007. "Neighborhood Social Mix as a Goal of Housing Policy: A Theoretical Analysis." European Journal of Housing Policy 7:19-43.
6. Galster, G. and A. Zobel. 1998. "Will Dispersed Housing Programmes Reduce Social Problems in the US." Housing Studies 13:605-22.
7. Goering, J. 2005. "Expanding Housing Choice and Integrating Neighborhoods: The MTO Experiment." Pp. 128-49 in The Geography of Opportunity: Race and Housing Choice in Metropolitan America, edited by X. Briggs. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
8. Goetz, E. 2003. Clearing the Way: Deconcentrating the Poor in Urban America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
9. Grigsby, W.G. and S. Bourassa. 2004. "Section 8: The Time and Fundamental Program Change." Housing Policy Debate 15:805-34.
10. Johnson, M.P., H.F. Ladd, and J. Ludwig. 2002. "The Benefits and Costs of Residential Mobility Programmes for the Poor." Housing Studies 17:125-38.
11. Keels, M., G. Duncan, S. Deluca, R. Mendenhall, and J. Rosenbaum. 2005. "Fifteen Years Later: Can Residential Mobility Programs Provide a Long-Term Escape From Neighborhood Segregation, Crime and Poverty." Demography 42:51-73.
12. Kling, J., J. Liebman, L. Katz, and L. Sanbonmatsu. 2004. "Moving to Opportunity and Tranquility: Neighborhood Effects on Adult Economic Self-Sufficiency and Health From a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment." Report. NBER and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
13. Orr, L., J. Feins, R. Jacob, and E. Beecroft. 2003. "Moving to Opportunity: Interim Impacts Evaluation: Final Report." Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Washington, DC.
14. Reich, R. 1991. "Secession of the Successful." New York Times Magazine, January 20, p. 42.
15. Rosenbaum, J. 1995. "Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons From the Gautreaux Program." Housing Policy Debate 6:231-69.
16. Rosenbaum, J. and S. Popkin. 1991. "Employment and Earnings of Low-Income Blacks Who Move to Middle-Class Suburbs." Pp. 342-56 in The Urban Underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P. Peterson. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
17. Tiebout, C. 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures." Journal of Political Economy 64: 418-24.
18. Varady, D. 2005. Desegregating the City: Ghettos, Enclaves and Inequality. Albany: State University of New York.
19. Varady, D. and C. Walker. 2000. "Vouchering Out Distressed Subsidized Developments: Does Moving Lead to Improvements in Housing and Neighborhood Conditions?" Housing Policy Debate 11:115-62.
20. Varady, D. and C. Walker. 2003. "Using Housing Vouchers to Move to the Suburbs: How Do Families Fare?" Housing Policy Debate 14:347-82.
21. Wolfe, A. 1998. One Nation After All. New York: Viking.