In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 860-870

  Arzani, Amirhossein ^a   Dyverfeldt, Petter ^b,c   Ebbers, Tino ^b   Shadden, Shawn C ^a  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood flow; Computational fluid dynamics; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Turbulent kinetic energy

Indexed keywords

3D MODELS; AORTIC COARCTATION; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELING; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR; IMAGE-BASED; IN-VIVO; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENT; MODELING AND MEASUREMENT; NUMERICAL PREDICTIONS; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE-CONTRAST; PRESSURE PULSE; TIME-RESOLVED; TURBULENCE INTENSITY; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY; VASCULATURE;

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FORECASTING; HEMODYNAMICS; KINETIC ENERGY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

AORTA COARCTATION; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

AORTIC COARCTATION; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR;

EID: 84862117192     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0447-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Boussel, L., V. Rayz, A. Martin, G. Acevedo-Bolton, M. T. Lawton, R. Higashida, W. S. Smith, W. L. Young, and D. Saloner. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn. Reson. Med. 61(2):409-417, 2009.
2. Deissler, R. G. Turbulent Fluid Motion. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 1998.
3. Dyverfeldt, P., R. Gardhagen, A. Sigfridsson, M. Karls-son, and T. Ebbers. On MRI turbulence quantification. Magn. Reson. Med. 27(7):913-922, 2009.
4. Dyverfeldt, P., J. P. E. Kvitting, A. Sigfridsson, J. Engvall, A. F. Bolger, and T. Ebbers. Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: in vivo feasibility of generalized phase-contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 28(3):655-663, 2008.
5. Dyverfeldt, P., A. Sigfridsson, J. P. E. Kvitting, and T. Ebbers. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 56(4):850-858, 2006. (Pubitemid 44477668)
6. Elkins, C., M. Alley, L. Saetran, and J. Eaton. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocimetry measurements of turbulence quantities in complex flow. Exp. Fluids 46(2):285-296, 2009.
7. Firmin, D. N., P. D. Gatehouse, J. P. Konrad, G. Z. Yang, P. J. Kilner, and D. B. Longmore. Rapid 7-dimensional imaging of pulsatile flow. In: Proceedings in Computers in Cardiology, 1993.
8. Ford, M. D., H. N. Nikolov, J. S. Milner, S. P. Lownie, E. M. DeMont, W. Kalata, F. Loth, D. W. Holdsworth, and D. A. Steinman. Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24(12):1586-1592, 2005. (Pubitemid 41812026)
9. Ford, M. D., G. R. Stuhne, H. N. Nikolov, D. F. Habets, S. P. Lownie, D. W. Holdsworth, and D. A. Steinman. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J. Bio-mech. Eng. 130(2):021015, 2008.
10. Gao, J., and J. C. Gore. Turbulent flow effects on NMR imaging: measurement of turbulent intensity. Med. Phys. 18(5):1045-1051, 1991.
11. Gatenby, J. C., T. R. McCauley, and J. C. Gore. Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. Med. Phys. 20(4):1049-1057, 1993. (Pubitemid 23249850)
12. Hoi, Y., S. H. Woodward, M. Kim, D. B. Taulbee, and H. Meng. Validation of CFD simulations of cerebral aneurysms with implication of geometric variations. J. Biomech. Eng. 128(6):844-851, 2006. (Pubitemid 46144914)
13. Jansen, K. E., C. H. Whiting, and G. M. Hulbert. Generalized-alpha method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(3):305-319, 2000.
14. Kim, H. J., C. A. Figueroa, T. J. R. Hughes, K. E. Jansen, and C. A. Taylor. Augmented lagrangian method for constraining the shape of velocity profiles at outlet boundaries for three-dimensional finite element simulations of blood flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(45-46):3551-3566, 2009.
15. Ku, J. P., M. T. Draney, F. R. Arko, W. A. Lee, F. P. Chan, N. J. Pelc, C. K. Zarins, and C. A. Taylor. Validation of numerical prediction of blood flow in arterial bypass grafts. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30(6):743-752, 2002. (Pubitemid 35019462)
16. Ku, J. P., C. J. Elkins, and C. A. Taylor. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro large artery bypass graft mode. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 33(3):257-269, 2005. (Pubitemid 40536658)
17. Kung, E. O., A. S. Les, C. A. Figueroa, F. Medina, K. Arcaute, R. B. Wicker, M. V. McConnell, and C. A. Taylor. In vitro validation of finite element analysis of blood flow in deformable models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:1947-1960, 2011.
18. Kung, E. O., A. S. Les, F. Medina, R. B. Wicker, M. V. McConnell, and C. A. Taylor. In vitro validation of finite-element model of AAA hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions. J. Biomech. Eng. 133(4):041003, 2011.
19. LaDisa, J. F., Jr., R. J. Dholakia, C. A. Figueroa, I. E. Vignon-Clementel, F. P. Chan, M. M. Samyn, J. R. Cava, C. A. Taylor, and J. A. Feinstein. Computational simulations demonstrate altered wall shear stress in aortic coarctation patients previously treated by resection with end-to-end anastomosis. Congenit. Heart Dis. 6(5):432-443, 2011.
20. LaDisa, J. F., C. A. Taylor, and F. A. Jeffrey FA. Aortic coarctation: recent developments in experimental and computational methods to assess treatments for this simple condition. Prog. Pediatr. Cardiol. 30(1-2):45-49, 2010.
21. Laskey, W. K., H. G. Parker, V. A. Ferrari, W. G. Kussmaul, and A. Noordergraaf. Estimation of total systemic arterial compliance in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 69(1):112-119, 1990. (Pubitemid 20230950)
22. Les, A. S., S. C. Shadden, C. A. Figueroa, J. M. Park, M. M. Tedesco, R. J. Herfkens, R. L. Dalman, and C. A. Taylor. Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:1288-1313, 2010.
23. Marshall, I., S. Zhao, P. Papathanasopoulou, P. Hoskins, X. Y. Xu. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models. J. Bio-mech. 37(5):679-687, 2004. (Pubitemid 38445030)
24. Morris, L., P. Delassus, A. Callanan, M. Walsh, F. Wallis, P. Grace, and T. McGloughlin T. 3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta. J. Bio-mech. Eng. 127(5):767-775, 2005. (Pubitemid 41374636)
25. Nichols, W. W., and M. F. O'Rourke. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London: Hodder Arnold Publication, 2005.
26. Papathanasopoulou, P., S. Zhao, U. Kohler, M. B. Robertson, Q. Long, P. Hoskins, X. Y. Xu, and I. Marshall. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17(2):153-162, 2003. (Pubitemid 36151002)
27. Petersson, S., P. Dyverfeldt, R. Gardhagen, M. Karlsson, and T. Ebbers. Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow. Magn. Reson. Med. 64(4):1039-1046, 2010.
28. Rayz, V. L., L. Boussel, G. Acevedo-Bolton, A. J. Martin, W. L. Young, M. T. Lawton, R. Higashida, and D. Saloner. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. J. Biomech. Eng. 130(5):051011, 2008.
29. Richter, Y., and E. R. Elazer. Cardiology is flow. Circulation 113(23):2679-2682, 2006. (Pubitemid 43947984)
30. Seed, W. A., and N. B. Wood. Velocity patterns in the aorta. Cardiovasc. Res. 5(3):319-330, 1971.
31. Steinman, D. A., C. R. Ethier, and B. K. Rutt. Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7(2):339-346, 1997. (Pubitemid 28356968)
32. Stergiopulos, N., J. Meister, and N. Westerhof. Simple and accurate way for estimating total and segmental arterial compliance: the pulse pressure method. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 22:392-397, 1994. (Pubitemid 24264086)
33. Stergiopulos, N., D. F. Young, and T. R. Rogge. Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses. J. Biomech. 25(12):1477-1488, 1992.
34. Taylor, C. A., M. T. Draney, J. P. Ku, D. Parker, B. N. Steele, K. Wang, and C. K. Zarins. Predictive medicine: Computational techniques in therapeutic decision-making. Comput. Aided Surg. 4(5):231-247, 1999. (Pubitemid 30014302)
35. Taylor, C. A., and C. A. Figueroa CA. Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 11(1):109-134, 2009.
36. Taylor, C. A., T. J. R. Hughes, and C. K. Zarins. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 158(1-2):155-196, 1998. (Pubitemid 28424825)
37. Taylor, C. A., and D. A. Steinman. Image-based modeling of blood flow and vessel wall dynamics: applications, methods and future directions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38(3):1188-1203, 2010.
38. Vignon-Clementel, I. E., C. A. Figueroa, K. E. Jansen, and C. A. Taylor. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195(29-32):3776-3796, 2006.
39. Wigstrom, L., L. Sjoqvist, and B. Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 36(5):800-803, 1996. (Pubitemid 26376721)
40. Wilson, N., K. Wang, R. Dutton, and C. A. Taylor. A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2208:449-456, 2001. (Pubitemid 33352443)
41. Zamir, M., P. Sinclair, and T. H. Wonnacott. Relation between diameter and flow in major branches of the arch of the aorta. J. Biomech. 25(11):1303-1310, 1992.