Simulation of phase contrast MRI of turbulent flow

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1039-1046

  Petersson, Sven ^a   Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a   Gårdhagen, Roland ^a   Karlsson, Matts ^a   Ebbers, Tino ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Constriction; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Turbulence intensity; Turbulent flow

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TURBULENCE;

CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CONSTRICTION; EULERIAN-LAGRANGIAN APPROACH; PARTICLE TRAJECTORIES; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHASE CONTRAST MRI; STANDARD DEVIATION; TURBULENCE INTENSITY;

TURBULENT FLOW;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PHASE CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIMULATION; TURBULENT FLOW; VOXEL BASED MORPHOMETRY;

EID: 77957374583     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22494     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pennell D, Sechtem U, Higgins C, Manning W, Pohost G, Rademakers F, van Rossum A, Shaw L, Yucel E. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1940-1965. (Pubitemid 39452612)
2. Hendel R, Patel M, Kramer C, Poon M, Carr J, Gerstad N, Gillam L, Hodgson J, Kim R. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475-1497.
3. Wigström L, Sjöqvist L, Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:800-803.
4. Bolger A, Heiberg E, Karlsson M, Wigstrom L, Engvall J, Sigfridsson A, Ebbers T, Kvitting J, Carlhall C, Wranne B. Transit of blood flow through the human left ventricle mapped by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:741-747.
5. Kilner P, Yang G, Wilkes A, Mohiaddin R, Firmin D, Yacoub M. Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature 2000;404:759-761.
6. Kvitting J, Ebbers T, Wigström L, Engvall J, Olin C, Bolger A. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1602-1607.
7. Markl M, Draney M, Hope M, Levin J, Chan F, Alley M, Pelc N, Herfkens R. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:459.
8. Frydrychowicz A, Schlensak C, Stalder A, Russe M, Siepe M, Beyersdorf F, Langer M, Hennig J, Markl M. Ascending-descending aortic bypass surgery in aortic arch coarctation: Four-dimensional magnetic resonance flow analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:260-262.
9. Gatenby J, McCauley T, Gore J. Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. Med Phys 1993;20:1049.
10. O'Brien K, Cowan B, Jain M, Stewart R, Kerr A, Young A. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:210-218.
11. Ståhlberg F, Thomsen C, Søndergaard L, Henriksen O. Pulse sequence design for MR velocity mapping of complex flow: notes on the necessity of low echo times. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1255-1262.
12. Oshinski J, Ku D, Pettigrew R. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:193-199.
13. O'Brien K, Myerson S, Cowan B, Young A, Robson M, Freemasons N, Trust W, Fellowship S. Phase contrast ultrashort TE: a more reliable technique for measurement of high-velocity turbulent stenotic jets. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:626-636.
14. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting J, Ebbers T. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:850-858.
15. Doorly DJ, Ljungdahl M. Computational simulation of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for velocity field measurements. In the Proceedings of ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 1997.
16. Lee KL, Doorly DJ, Firmin DN. Numerical simulations of phase contrast velocity mapping of complex flows in an anatomically realistic bypass graft geometry. Med Phys 2006;33:2621-2631.
17. Jou LD, Saloner D. A numerical study of magnetic resonance images of pulsatile flow in a two dimensional carotid bifurcation - a numerical study of MR images. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:643-652.
18. Lorthois S, Stroud-Rossman J, Berger S, Jou LD, Saloner D. Numerical simulation of magnetic resonance angiographies of an anatomically realistic stenotic carotid bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:270-283.
19. Hinze JO. Turbulence. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1975.
20. Siegel J Jr., Oshinski J, Pettigrew R, Ku D. Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:609-614.
21. Mathieu J, Scott J. An introduction to turbulent flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
22. Gårdhagen R, Lantz J, Carlsson F, Karlsson M. Quantifying turbulent wall shear stress in a Stenosed pipe using large Eddy simulation. J Biomechanical Engin, 2010;132:0610021-0610027.
23. Gårdhagen R, Lantz J, Carlsson F, Karlsson M. Large Eddy simulation of flow through a stenosed pipe. In the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference, Marco Island, Florida, USA, 2008.
24. Ahmed S. An experimental investigation of pulsatile flow through a smooth constriction. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 1998;17:309-318.
25. Oefelein J, Schefer R, Barlow R. Toward validation of large eddy simulation for turbulent combustion. AIAA J 2006;44:418-433.
26. Jou LD, vanTyen R, Berger SA, Saloner D. Calculation of the magnetization distribution for fluid flow in curved vessels. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:577-584.
27. Pelc N, Bernstein M, Shimakawa A, Glover G. Encoding strategies for three-direction phase-contrast MR imaging of flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:405413.
28. Dyverfeldt P, Gårdhagen R, Sigfridsson A, Karlsson M, Ebbers T. On MRI turbulence quantification. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:913-922.
29. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:910.