Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: In vivo feasibility of generalized phase-contrast MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 655-663

  Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a   Kvitting, John Peder Escobar ^a   Sigfridsson, Andreas ^a   Engvall, Jan ^a   Bolger, Ann F ^a,b   Ebbers, Tino ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Intravoxel velocity standard deviation mapping; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Stenosis; Turbulence; Turbulent flow

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CASE REPORT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 51449112368     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21475     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Richter Y, Edelman ER. Cardiology is flow. Circulation 2006;113:2679-2682.
2. Hinze JO. Turbulence. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975.
3. Nichols W, O'Rourke M. McDonald's blood flow in arteries. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005.
4. Sallam AM, Hwang NH. Human red blood cell hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow: contribution of Reynolds shear stresses. Biorheology 1984;21:783-797.
5. Stein PD, Sabbah HN. Measured turbulence and its effect on thrombus formation. Circ Res 1974;35:608-614.
6. Becker RC, Eisenberg P, Turpie AG. Pathobiologic features and prevention of thrombotic complications associated with prosthetic heart valves: fundamental principles and the contribution of platelets and thrombin. Am Heart J 2001;141:1025-1037.
7. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035-2042.
8. Cheng C, Tempel D, van Haperen R, et al. Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006;113:2744-2753.
9. Stein PD, Sabbah HN. Turbulent blood flow in the ascending aorta of humans with normal and diseased aortic valves. Circ Res 1976;39:58-65.
10. Nygaard H, Paulsen P, Hasenkam J, Pedersen E, Rovsing P. Turbulent stresses downstream of three mechanical aortic valve prostheses in human beings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;107:438-446.
11. Isaaz K, Bruntz JF, Da Costa A, et al. Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:965-974.
12. Grigioni M, Daniele C, D'Avenio G, Barbara V. On the monodimensional approach to the estimation of the highest Reynolds shear stress in a turbulent flow. J Biomech 2000;33:701-708.
13. Moran PR. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging 1982;1:197-203.
14. Wigström L, Sjöqvist L, Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:800-803.
15. Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Crowe LA, et al. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol 2005;15:2172-2184.
16. Pennell D, Sechtem U, Higgins C, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1940-1965.
17. DiCarlo JC, Hargreaves BA, Nayak KS, Hu BS, Pauly JM, Nishimura DG. Variable-density one-shot Fourier velocity encoding. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:645-655.
18. Galea D, Lauzon M, Drangova M. Peak velocity determination using fast Fourier velocity encoding with minimal spatial encoding. Med Phys 2002;29:1719.
19. Nayak K, Hu B, Nishimura D. Rapid quantitation of high-speed flow jets. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:366-372.
20. Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:193-199.
21. Prince M, Schoenberg S, Ward J, Londy F, Wakefield T, Stanley J. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997;205:128-136.
22. Wasser M, Westenberg J, van der Hulst V, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-338.
23. Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Kvitting JPE, Ebbers T. Quantification of intravoxel velocity standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:850-858.
24. Haacke E, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
25. Mathieu J, Scott J. An introduction to turbulent flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
26. Wigström L, Ebbers T, Fyrenius A, et al. Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:793-799.
27. Kvitting JPE, Ebbers T, Wigström L, Engvall J, Olin CL, Bolger AF. Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1602-1607.
28. Milano A, Blanzola C, Mecozzi G, et al. Hemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:33-38.
29. Lim W, Chew Y, Chew T, Low H. Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage. J Biomech 2001;34:1417-1427.
30. Kozerke S, Hasenkam JM, Pedersen EM, Boesiger P. Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:690-698.
31. Kuethe DO, Gao JH. NMR signal loss from turbulence: models of time dependence compared with data. Phys Rev E 1995;51:3252-3262.
32. Nygaard H, Hasenkam J, Pedersen E, Kim W, Paulsen P. A new perivascular multi-element pulsed Doppler ultrasound system form vivo studies of velocity fields and turbulent stresses in large vessels. Med Biol Eng Comput 1994;32:55-62.
33. Pipe JG. A simple measure of flow disorder and wall shear stress in phase contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:543-550.
34. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Cook JW, Fowler B. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:177-185.
35. Wakhloo AK, Lieber BB, Seong J, et al. Hemodynamics of carotid artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:S111-S121.
36. Yoganathan AP, Chandran KB, Sotiropoulos F. Flow in prosthetic heart valves: state-of-the-art and future directions. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:1689-1694.
37. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-790; discussion 790-781.
38. Tsao J, Boesiger P, Pruessmann K. kt BLAST and kt SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1031-1042.
39. Elkins CJ, Markl M, Pelc NJ, Eaton JK. 4D magnetic resonance velocimetry for mean velocity measurements in complex turbulent flow. Exp Fluids 2003;34:494-503.
40. Elkins C, Alley M. Magnetic resonance velocimetry: applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the measurement of fluid motion. Exp Fluids 2007;43:823-858.