In vitro validation of finite-element model of aaa hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Kung, Ethan O ^a   Les, Andrea S ^a   Medina, Francisco ^b   Wicker, Ryan B ^b   McConnell, Michael V ^c   Taylor, Charles A ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b University of Texas at El Paso   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Blood flow; Boundary condition; Computational fluid dynamics; In vitro validation; Phase contrast MRI; Physiological pressure; Rigid phantom; Windkessel

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; BLOOD FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID; IN-VITRO; PHASE-CONTRAST MRI; PHYSIOLOGICAL PRESSURE; RIGID PHANTOM; WINDKESSEL;

BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXPERIMENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID DYNAMICS; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RESONANCE;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; SIMULATION; VALIDATION STUDY; VELOCITY; WAVEFORM; WINDKESSEL MODEL; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC;

EID: 79951818796     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003526     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Taylor C. Steinman D. Image-Based Modeling of Blood Flow and Vessel Wall Dynamics: Applications, Methods and Future Directions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 38(3):1188-1203. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-010-9901-0.
2. Caro C.G. Fitz-Gerald J.M. Schroter R.C. Atheroma and Arterial Wall Shear. Observation, Correlation and Proposal of a Shear Dependent Mass Transfer Mechanism for Atherogenesis. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 1971, 177(1046):109-133. PRLBA4, 0962-8452, 10.1098/rspb.1971.0019.
3. Glagov S. Zarins C. Giddens D.P. Ku D.N. Hemodynamics and Atherosclerosis. Insights and Perspectives Gained From Studies of Human Arteries. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 1988, 112(10):1018-1031. APLMAS, 0003-9985.
4. Ku D.N. Giddens D.P. Zarins C.K. Glagov S. Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in the Human Carotid Bifurcation. Positive Correlation Between Plaque Location and Low Oscillating Shear Stress. Arteriosclerosis (Dallas) 1985, 5(3):293-302. ARTRDW, 0276-5047.
5. Malek A.M. Alper S.L. Izumo S. Hemodynamic Shear Stress and Its Role in Atherosclerosis. JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1999, 282(21):2035-2042. JAMAAP, 0098-7484, 10.1001/jama.282.21.2035.
6. Langille B.L. Bendeck M.P. Keeley F.W. Adaptations of Carotid Arteries of Young and Mature Rabbits to Reduced Carotid Blood Flow. Am. J. Physiol. 1989, 256(4):H931-H939. AJPHAP, 0002-9513.
7. Wolinsky H. Glagov S. A Lamellar Unit of Aortic Medial Structure and Function in Mammals. Circ. Res. 1967, 20(1):99-111. CIRUAL, 0009-7330.
8. Jou L.-D. Quick C.M. Young W.L. Lawton M.T. Higashida R. Martin A. Saloner D. Computational Approach to Quantifying Hemodynamic Forces in Giant Cerebral Aneurysms. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24(9):1804-1810. ZZZZZZ, 0195-6108.
9. Laganà K. Balossino R. Migliavacca F. Pennati G. Bove E.L. de Leval M.R. Dubini G. Multiscale Modeling of the Cardiovascular System: Application to the Study of Pulmonary and Coronary Perfusions in the Univentricular Circulation. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(5):1129-1141. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.027.
10. Tang B.T. Cheng C.P. Draney M.T. Wilson N.M. Tsao P.S. Herfkens R.J. Taylor C.A. Abdominal Aortic Hemodynamics in Young Healthy Adults at Rest and During Lower Limb Exercise: Quantification Using Image-Based Computer Modeling. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 291(2):H668-H676. ZZZZZZ, 0363-6135, 10.1152/ajpheart.01301.2005.
11. Taylor C.A. Hughes T.J. Zarins C.K. Finite Element Modeling of Three-Dimensional Pulsatile Flow in the Abdominal Aorta: Relevance to Atherosclerosis. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1998, 26(6):975-987. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.140.
12. Wentzel J.J. Gijsen F.J. H. Schuurbiers J.C. H. Krams R. Serruys P.W. De Feyter P.J. Slager C.J. Geometry Guided Data Averaging Enables the Interpretation of Shear Stress Related Plaque Development in Human Coronary Arteries. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(7):1551-1555. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.06.022.
13. Anderson J. Wood H.G. Allaire P.E. Olsen D.B. Numerical Analysis of Blood Flow in the Clearance Regions of a Continuous Flow Artificial Heart Pump. Artif. Organs 2000, 24(6):492-500. ARORD7, 0160-564X, 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06580.x.
14. Benard N. Perrault R. Coisne D. Blood Flow in Stented Coronary Artery: Numerical Fluid Dynamics Analysis. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEMBS '04 2004, 3800-3803.
15. Cebral J.R. Lohner R. Efficient Simulation of Blood Flow Past Complex Endovascular Devices Using an Adaptive Embedding Technique. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2005, 24(4):468-476. ITMID4, 0278-0062, 10.1109/TMI.2005.844172.
16. Li Z. Kleinstreuer C. Blood Flow and Structure Interactions in a Stented Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Model. Med. Eng. Phys. 2005, 27(5):369-382. MEPHEO, 1350-4533, 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.12.003.
17. Migliavacca F. Balossino R. Pennati G. Dubini G. Hsia T.-Y. de Leval M.R. Bove E.L. Multiscale Modelling in Biofluidynamics: Application to Reconstructive Paediatric Cardiac Surgery. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(6):1010-1020. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.021.
18. Taylor C.A. Draney M.T. Ku J.P. Parker D. Steele B.N. Wang K. Zarins C.K. Predictive Medicine: Computational Techniques in Therapeutic Decision-Making. Comput. Aided Surg. 1999, 4(5):231-247. ZZZZZZ, 1092-9088, 10.3109/10929089909148176.
19. Hope T. Markl M. Wigström L. Alley M. Miller D. Herfkens R. Comparison of Flow Patterns in Ascending Aortic Aneurysms and Volunteers Using Four Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 2007, 26(6):1471-1479. ZZZZZZ, 1053-1807, 10.1002/jmri.21082.
20. Markl M. Draney M.T. Miller D.C. Levin J.M. Williamson E.E. Pelc N.J. Liang D.H. Herfkens R.J. Time-Resolved Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Velocity Mapping of Aortic Flow in Healthy Volunteers and Patients After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005, 130(2):456-463. JTCSAQ, 0022-5223, 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.08.056.
21. Acevedo-Bolton G. Jou L.-D. Dispensa B.P. Lawton M.T. Higashida R.T. Martin A.J. Young W.L. Saloner D. Estimating the Hemodynamic Impact of Interventional Treatments of Aneurysms: Numerical Simulation With Experimental Validation: Technical Case Report. Neurosurgery 2006, 59(2):E429-E430. ZZZZZZ, 0148-396X, 10.1227/01.NEU.0000223495.39240.9A.
22. Hoi Y. Woodward S.H. Kim M. Taulbee D.B. Meng H. Validation of CFD Simulations of Cerebral Aneurysms With Implication of Geometric Variations. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128(6):844-851. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2354209.
23. Frauenfelder T. Lotfey M. Boehm T. Wildermuth S. Computational Fluid Dynamics: Hemodynamic Changes in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After Stent-Graft Implantation. Cardiovasc. Intervent Radiol. 2006, 29(4):613-623. ZZZZZZ, 0174-1551, 10.1007/s00270-005-0227-5.
24. Wang C. Pekkan K. de Zélicourt D. Horner M. Parihar A. Kulkarni A. Yoganathan A.P. Progress in the CFD Modeling of Flow Instabilities in Anatomical Total Cavopulmonary Connections. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 35(11):1840-1856. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-007-9356-0.
25. Ford M.D. Nikolov H.N. Milner J.S. Lownie S.P. DeMont E.M. Kalata W. Loth F. Holdsworth D.W. Steinman D.A. PIV-Measured Versus CFD-Predicted Flow Dynamics in Anatomically Realistic Cerebral Aneurysm Models. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2008, 130(2):021015. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2900724.
26. Marshall I. Zhao S. Papathanasopoulou P. Hoskins P. Xu Y. MRI and CFD Studies of Pulsatile Flow in Healthy and Stenosed Carotid Bifurcation Models. J. Biomech. 2004, 37(5):679-687. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.09.032.
27. Salsac A. Sparks S. Lasheras J. Hemodynamic Changes Occurring During the Progressive Enlargement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2004, 18(1):14-21. ZZZZZZ, 0890-5096, 10.1007/s10016-003-0101-3.
28. Les A.S. Shadden S.C. Figueroa C.A. Park J.M. Tedesco M.M. Herfkens R.J. Dalman R.L. Taylor C.A. Quantification of Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms During Rest and Exercise Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38(4):1288-1313. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-010-9949-x.
29. Olufsen M.S. A One-Dimensional Fluid Dynamic Model of the Systemic Arteries. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2000, 71:79-97. ZZZZZZ, 0926-9630.
30. Vignon-Clementel I.E. Figueroa C.A. Jansen K.E. Taylor C.A. Outflow Boundary Conditions for Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Blood Flow and Pressure in Arteries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195(29-32):3776-3796. CMMECC, 0045-7825, 10.1016/j.cma.2005.04.014.
31. Grant B.J. Paradowski L.J. Characterization of Pulmonary Arterial Input Impedance With Lumped Parameter Models. Am. J. Physiol. 1987, 252(3):H585-H593. AJPHAP, 0002-9513.
32. Elkins C.J. Markl M. Iyengar A. Wicker R. Eaton J.K. Full-Field Velocity and Temperature Measurements Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Turbulent Complex Internal Flows. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2004, 25(5):702-710. IJHFD2, 0142-727X, 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.05.017.
33. Kung E. Taylor C. Development of a Physical Windkessel Module to Re-Create In Vivo Vascular Flow Impedance for In Vitro Experiments. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 2010, 2(1):2-14. 10.1007/s13239-010-0030-6.
34. Westerhof N. Elzinga G. Sipkema P. An Artificial Arterial System for Pumping Hearts. J. Appl. Physiol. 1971, 31(5):776-781. JAPYAA, 0021-8987.
35. Bax L. Bakker C.J. Klein W.M. Blanken N. Beutler J.J. Mali W.P. Renal Blood Flow Measurements With Use of Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Normal Values and Reproducibility. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2005, 16(6):807-814. ZZZZZZ, 1051-0443.
36. Ku J.P. Elkins C.J. Taylor C.A. Comparison of CFD and MRI Flow and Velocities in an In Vitro Large Artery Bypass Graft Model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(3):257-269. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1007/s10439-005-1729-7.
37. Shankar P. Kumar M. Experimental Determination of the Kinematic Viscosity of Glycerol-Water Mixtures. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1994, 444(1922):573-581. PRLAAZ, 0950-1207, 10.1098/rspa.1994.0039.
38. Kim H.J. Figueroa C.A. Hughes T.J. R. Jansen K.E. Taylor C.A. Augmented Lagrangian Method for Constraining the Shape of Velocity Profiles at Outlet Boundaries for Three-Dimensional Finite Element Simulations of Blood Flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2009, 198:3551-3566. CMMECC, 0045-7825, 10.1016/j.cma.2009.02.012.
39. Lotz J. Meier C. Leppert A. Galanski M. Cardiovascular Flow Measurement With Phase-Contrast MR Imaging: Basic Facts and Implementation. Radiographics 2002, 22(3):651-671. ZZZZZZ, 0271-5333.
40. McCauley T.R. Pena C.S. Holland C.K. Price T.B. Gore J.C. Validation of Volume Flow Measurements With Cine Phase-Contrast MR Imaging for Peripheral Arterial Waveforms. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 1995, 5(6):663-668. ZZZZZZ, 1053-1807, 10.1002/jmri.1880050608.
41. Kilner P.J. Firmin D.N. Rees R.S. Martinez J. Pennell D.J. Mohiaddin R.H. Underwood S.R. Longmore D.B. Valve and Great Vessel Stenosis: Assessment With MR Jet Velocity Mapping. Radiology 1991, 178(1):229-235. RADLAX, 0033-8419.
42. Oshinski J. Ku D. Pettigrew R. Turbulent Fluctuation Velocity: The Most Significant Determinant of Signal Loss in Stenotic Vessels. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 33(2):193-199. MRMEEN, 0740-3194, 10.1002/mrm.1910330208.
43. Guyton J.R. Hartley C.J. Flow Restriction of One Carotid Artery in Juvenile Rats Inhibits Growth of Arterial Diameter. Am. J. Physiol. 1985, 248(4):H540-H546. AJPHAP, 0002-9513.
44. Botnar R. Rappitsch G. Scheidegger M.B. Liepsch D. Perktold K. Boesiger P. Hemodynamics in the Carotid Artery Bifurcation: A Comparison Between Numerical Simulations and In Vitro MRI Measurements. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(2):137-144. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00164-5.
45. Zhao S.Z. Papathanasopoulou P. Long Q. Marshall I. Xu X.Y. Comparative Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics for Quantification of Pulsatile Flow in a Carotid Bifurcation Phantom. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2003, 31(8):962-971. ABMECF, 0090-6964, 10.1114/1.1590664.
46. Figueroa C.A. Vignon-Clementel I.E. Jansen K.E. Hughes T.J. R. Taylor C.A. A Coupled Momentum Method for Modeling Blood Flow in Three-Dimensional Deformable Arteries. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195(41-43):5685-5706. CMMECC, 0045-7825, 10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.011.