Not all face aftereffects are equal

Vision Research

Volumn 64, Issue , 2012, Pages 7-16

  Storrs, Katherine R ^a   Arnold, Derek H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Face aftereffects; Opponent coding

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FACIES; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AFTERIMAGE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84861922580     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.020     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams R. An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 1834, 5:373-374.
2. Allan L.G. The relationship between judgments of successiveness and judgments of order. Perception and Psychophysics 1975, 18:29-36. 10.3758/BF03199363.
3. Anderson N.D., Wilson H.R. The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research 2005, 45:1815-1828. 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.012.
4. Anstis S.M., Cavanagh P. A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. Color vision: Physiology and psychophysics 1983, 156-166. Academic, London, UK. J. Mollon, R.T. Sharpe (Eds.).
5. Barlow H.B., Hill R.M. Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature 1963, 200:1345-1347.
6. Benton C.P., Burgess E.C. The direction of measured face aftereffects. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-6. 10.1167/8.15.1.
7. Calder A.J., Jenkins R., Cassel A., Clifford C.W.G. Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:244-261. 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.244.
8. Clifford C.W.G., Wenderoth P., Spehar B. A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2000, 267:1705-1710. 10.1098/rspb.2000.1198.
9. Daelli V. High-level adaptation aftereffects for novel objects: The role of pre-existing representations. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:1923-1927. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.019.
10. Daelli V., van Rijsbergen N.J., Treves A. How recent experience affects the perception of ambiguous objects. Brain Research 2010, 1322:81-91. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.060.
11. Derrington A.M., Krauskopf J., Lennie P. Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. The Journal of Physiology 1984, 357:241-265.
12. Fang F., He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 2005, 45:793-800. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.037.
13. Gibson J.J. Adaptation, aftereffect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:553-569.
14. Gibson J.J., Radner M. Adaptation, aftereffect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1937, 20:453-467.
15. Giese M.A., Leopold D.A. Physiologically inspired neural model for the encoding of face spaces. Neurocomputing 2005, 65:94-101. 10.1016/j.neucom.2004.10.060.
16. Greene M.R., Oliva A. High-level aftereffects to global scene properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:1430-1443. 10.1037/a0019058.
17. Hsu S.-M., Young A.W. Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:871-899. 10.1080/13506280444000030.
18. Hubel D.H., Weisel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 1962, 160:106-154.
19. Hurvitch L.M., Jameson D. An opponent-process theory of colour vision. Psychological Review 1957, 64:384-404.
20. Lawson R.P., Clifford C.W.G., Calder A.J. A real head-turner: Horizontal and vertical head directions are multichannel coded. Journal of Vision 2011, 11:1-17. 10.1167/11.9.17.
21. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
22. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Muller K.-M., Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2005, 272:897-904. 10.1098/rspb.2004.3022.
23. MacLin O.H., Webster M.A. Influence of adaptation on the perception of distortions in natural images. Journal of Electronic Imaging 2001, 10:100-109.
24. Mitchell D.E., Muir D.W. Does the tilt after-effect occur in the oblique meridian?. Vision Research 1976, 16:609-613.
25. Rhodes G., Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 2006, 46:2977-2987. 10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002.
26. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Clifford C.W.G., Leopold D.A. The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects. Vision Research 2007, 47:2291-2296.
27. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 2003, 14:558-566. 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1465.x.
28. Rhodes G., Leopold D.A. Adaptive norm-based coding of face identity. Oxford handbook of face perception 2011, 263-286. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A.J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. Johnson (Eds.).
29. Robbins R., McKone E., Edwards M. Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adaptor position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:570-592. 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.570.
30. Schwartz O., Sejnowski T.J., Dayan P. Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:19-32. 10.1167/9.4.19.
31. Schweinberger S.R., Zäske R., Walther C., Golle J., Kovács G., Wiese H. Young without plastic surgery: Perceptual adaptation to the age of female and male faces. Vision Research 2010, 50:2570-2576. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.017.
32. Seriès P., Stocker A.A., Simoncelli E.P. Is the homunculus " aware" of sensory adaptation?. Neural Computation 2009, 21:3271-3304.
33. Seyama J., Nagayama R.S. Eye direction aftereffect. Psychological Research 2006, 70:59-67. 10.1007/s00426-004-0188-3.
34. Susilo T., McKone E., Edwards M. What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vision Research 2010, 50:300-314. 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.016.
35. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A. What's so special about the average face?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:391-393.
36. Ulrich R. Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task. Perception and Psychophysics 1987, 42:224-239.
37. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1991, 43A:161-204. 10.1080/17470216108416498.
38. Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G. Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception 2003, 32:1109-1116.
39. Webster M.A. Adaptation and visual coding. Journal of Vision 2011, 11:1-23. 10.1167/11.5.3.
40. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004, 428:557-560. 10.1038/nature02420.
41. Webster M.A., Leonard D. Adaptation and perceptual norms in colour vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2008, 25:2817-2825. 10.1364/JOSAA.25.002817.
42. Webster M.A., MacLeod D.I.A. Visual adaptation and face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2011, 366:1702-1725. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0360.
43. Webster M.A., MacLin O. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1999, 6:647-653. 10.3758/BF03212974.
44. Westheimer G. Simultaneous orientation contrast for lines in the human fovea. Vision Research 1990, 30:1913-1921. 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90167-J.
45. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception and Psychophysics 2001, 63(8):1293-1313. 10.3758/BF03194544.
46. Willenbockel V., Sadr J., Fiset D., Horne G., Gosselin F., Tanaka J. The SHINE toolbox for controlling low-level image properties. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(7). 10.1167/10.7.653.
47. Xu H., Dayan P., Lipkin R.M., Qian N. Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: Low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgements. Journal of Neuroscience 2008, 28:3374-3383. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-08.2008.
48. Yarrow K., Jahn N., Durant S., Arnold D.H. Shifts of criteria or neural timing? The assumptions underlying timing perception studies. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:1518-1531. 10.1016/j.concog.2011.07.003.
49. Zhao C., Seriès P., Hancock P.J.B., Bednar J.A. Similar neural adaptation mechanisms underlying face gender and tilt aftereffects. Vision Research 2011, 51:2021-2030. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.014.