Assessment of CFD Performance in Simulations of an Idealized Medical Device: Results of FDA's First Computational Interlaboratory Study

Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 139-160

  Stewart, Sandy F C ^a   Paterson, Eric G ^b   Burgreen, Greg W ^c   Hariharan, Prasanna ^a   Giarra, Matthew ^d   Reddy, Varun ^b   Day, Steven W ^d   Manning, Keefe B ^b   Deutsch, Steven ^b   Berman, Michael R ^a   Myers, Matthew R ^a   Malinauskas, Richard A ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood damage; Computational fluid dynamics; Experimental validation; Medical devices

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK DATABASE; BIOFLUID DYNAMICS; BLOOD DAMAGE; CENTERLINE VELOCITY; COMPARISON METRICS; CONSENSUS STANDARDS; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; FLOW CONDITION; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTERLABORATORY STUDIES; MEDICAL DEVICES; MODEL GEOMETRY; MODELING TECHNIQUE; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRIES; PHYSICAL MODEL; PULSATILITY; RECIRCULATION ZONES; REGULATORY REVIEW; STANDARDIZED METHODS; SUDDEN EXPANSION;

BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; BLOOD; INLET FLOW; MODELS; TURBULENCE MODELS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DEVICE SAFETY; FLOW RATE; FLUID FLOW; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEMOLYSIS; LAMINAR FLOW; MEDICAL DEVICE; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR RATE; SHEAR STRESS; SIMULATION; TURBULENT FLOW; VELOCITY;

EID: 84861871972     PISSN: 1869408X     EISSN: 18694098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13239-012-0087-5     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bludszuweit, C. Model for a general mechanical blood damage prediction. Artif. Organs 19: 583-589, 1995.
2. Burgreen, G. W., J. F. Antaki, Z. J. Wu, and A. J. Holmes. Computational fluid dynamics as a development tool for rotary blood pumps. Artif. Organs 25: 336-340, 2001.
3. de Wachter, D., and P. Verdonck. Numerical calculation of hemolysis levels in peripheral hemodialysis cannulas. Artif. Organs 26: 576-582, 2002.
4. Dumont, K., J. Vierendeels, R. Kaminsky, G. van Nooten, P. Verdonck, and D. Bluestein. Comparison of the hemodynamic and thrombogenic performance of two bileaflet mechanical heart valves using a CFD/FSI model. J. Biomech. Eng. 129: 558-565, 2007.
5. Dwyer, H. A., P. B. Matthews, A. Azadani, N. Jaussaud, L. Ge, T. S. Guy, and E. E. Tseng. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 9: 301-308, 2009.
6. Fallon, A. M., L. P. Dasi, U. M. Marzec, S. R. Hanson, and A. P. Yoganathan. Procoagulant properties of flow fields in stenotic and expansive orifices. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36: 1-13, 2008.
7. Fiore, G. B., U. Morbiducci, R. Ponzini, and A. Redaelli. Bubble tracking through computational fluid dynamics in arterial line filters for cardiopulmonary bypass. ASAIO J. 55: 438-444, 2009.
8. Gach, H. M., and I. J. Lowe. Measuring flow reattachment lengths downstream of a stenosis using MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12: 939-948, 2000.
9. Garon, A., and M. I. Farinas. Fast three-dimensional numerical hemolysis approximation. Artif. Organs 28: 1016-1025, 2004.
10. Ge, L., H. L. Leo, F. Sotiropoulos, and A. P. Yoganathan. Flow in a mechanical bileaflet heart valve at laminar and near-peak systole flow rates: CFD simulations and experiments. J. Biomech. Eng. 127: 782-797, 2005.
11. Giersiepen, M., L. J. Wurzinger, R. Opitz, and H. Reul. Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses-in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. Int. J. Artif. Organs 13: 300-306, 1990.
12. Goubergrits, L., and K. Affeld. Numerical estimation of blood damage in artificial organs. Artif. Organs 28: 499-507, 2004.
13. Grigioni, M., U. Morbiducci, G. D'Avenio, G. D. Benedetto, and C. D. Gaudio. A novel formulation for blood trauma prediction by a modified power-law mathematical model. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 4: 249-260, 2005.
14. Gross, J. M., M. C. Shu, F. F. Dai, J. Ellis, and A. P. Yoganathan. A microstructural flow analysis within a bileaflet mechanical heart valve hinge. J. Heart Valve Dis. 5: 581-590, 1996.
15. Hariharan, P., M. Giarra, V. Reddy, S. Day, K. B. Manning, S. Deutsch, S. F. C. Stewart, M. R. Myers, M. R. Berman, G. W. Burgreen, E. G. Paterson, and R. A. Malinauskas. Experimental particle image velocimetry protocol and results database for validating computational fluid dynamic simulations of the FDA benchmark nozzle model. J. Biomech. Eng. 133: 041002, 2011.
16. He, Y., N. Duraiswamy, A. O. Frank, and J. E. Moore, Jr. Blood flow in stented arteries: a parametric comparison of strut design patterns in three dimensions. J. Biomech. Eng. 127: 637-647, 2005.
17. Hinds, M. T., Y. J. Park, S. A. Jones, D. P. Giddens, and B. R. Alevriadou. Local hemodynamics affect monocytic cell adhesion to a three-dimensional flow model coated with E-selectin. J. Biomech. 34: 95-103, 2001.
18. Izraelev, V., W. J. Weiss, B. Fritz, R. K. Newswanger, E. G. Paterson, A. Snyder, R. B. Medvitz, J. Cysyk, W. E. Pae, D. Hicks, B. Lukic, and G. Rosenberg. A passively suspended Tesla pump left ventricular assist device. ASAIO J. 55: 556-561, 2009.
19. Kameneva, M. V., G. W. Burgreen, K. Kono, B. Repko, J. F. Antaki, and M. Umezu. Effects of turbulent stresses upon mechanical hemolysis: experimental and computational analysis. ASAIO J. 50: 418-423, 2004.
20. Larsson, L., F. Stern, V. Bertram. Benchmarking of computational fluid dynamics for ship flows: the Gothenburg 2000 workshop. J. Ship. Res. 47: 63-81, 2003.
21. Longest, P. W., and C. Kleinstreuer. Comparison of blood particle deposition models for non-parallel flow domains. J. Biomech. 36: 421-430, 2003.
22. Nobili, M., U. Morbiducci, R. Ponzini, C. Del Gaudio, A. Balducci, M. Grigioni, F. Maria Montevecchi, and A. Redaelli. Numerical simulation of the dynamics of a bileaflet prosthetic heart valve using a fluid-structure interaction approach. J. Biomech. 41: 2539-2550, 2008.
23. Oberkampf, W. L., and M. F. Barone. Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. J. Comput. Phys. 217: 5-36, 2006.
24. Oberkampf, W. L., T. G. Trucano, and C. Hirsch. Verification validation and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57: 345-384, 2004.
25. Pant, S., N. W. Bressloff, A. I. Forrester, and N. Curzen. The influence of strut-connectors in stented vessels: a comparison of pulsatile flow through five coronary stents. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38: 1893-1907, 2010.
26. Pinotti, M., and E. S. Rosa. Computational prediction of hemolysis in a centrifugal ventricular assist device. Artif. Organs 19: 267-273, 1995.
27. Raz, S., S. Einav, Y. Alemu, and D. Bluestein. DPIV prediction of flow induced platelet activation-comparison to numerical predictions. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35: 493-504, 2007.
28. Sutera, S. P. Flow-induced trauma to blood cells. Circ. Res. 41: 2-11, 1977.
29. Takano, T., S. Schulte-Eistrup, S. Kawahito, T. Maeda, K. Nonaka, J. Linneweber, J. Glueck, A. Fujisawa, K. Makinouchi, M. Yokokawa, and Y. Nosé. Inlet port positioning for a miniaturized centrifugal blood pump. Artif. Organs 26: 45-48, 2002.
30. Tamagawa, M., H. Kaneda, M. Hiramoto, and S. Nagahama. Simulation of thrombus formation in shear flows using lattice Boltzmann method. Artif. Organs 33: 604-610, 2009.
31. Williams, A. R. Shear-induced fragmentation of human erythrocytes. Biorheology 10: 303-311, 1973.
32. Wu, J., J. F. Antaki, W. R. Wagner, T. A. Snyder, B. E. Paden, and H. S. Borovetz. Elimination of adverse leakage flow in a miniature pediatric centrifugal blood pump by computational fluid dynamics-based design optimization. ASAIO J. 51: 636-643, 2005.
33. Wu, J., B. E. Paden, H. S. Borovetz, and J. F. Antaki. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of blade tip clearances on hemodynamic performance and blood damage in a centrifugal ventricular assist device. Artif. Organs 34: 402-411, 2010.
34. Xenos, M., G. Girdhar, Y. Alemu, J. Jesty, M. Slepian, S. Einav, and D. Bluestein. Device Thrombogenicity Emulator (DTE)-design optimization methodology for cardiovascular devices: a study in two bileaflet MHV designs. J. Biomech. 43: 2400-2409, 2010.
35. Xu, Z., N. Chen, M. M. Kamocka, E. D. Rosen, and M. Alber. A multiscale model of thrombus development. J. R. Soc. Interface 5: 705-722, 2008.
36. Yano, T., K. Sekine, A. Mitoh, Y. Mitamura, E. Okamoto, D. W. Kim, I. Nishimura, S. Murabayashi, and R. Yozu. An estimation method of hemolysis within an axial flow blood pump by computational fluid dynamics analysis. Artif. Organs 27: 920-925, 2003.
37. Yeleswarapu, K. K., J. F. Antaki, M. V. Kameneva, and K. R. Rajagopal. A mathematical model for shear-induced hemolysis. Artif. Organs 19: 576-582, 1995.
38. http://aaac. larc. nasa. gov/tsab/cfdlarc/aiaa-dpw/.
39. http://wind. nrel. gov/amestest/.