Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Meadmore, Katie L ^a   Hughes, Ann Marie ^a   Freeman, Chris T ^a   Cai, Zhonglun ^a   Tong, Daisy ^a   Burridge, Jane H ^a   Rogers, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Functional electrical stimulation; Iterative learning control; Robotic support; Stroke rehabilitation; Upper limb; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PARESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SELF HELP; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARM; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PARESIS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SELF-HELP DEVICES; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84861859970     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-32     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. National Audit Office Department of Health, Progress in improving stroke care 2010
2. Stroke association, Stroke statistics 2006 1 7
3. Stroke incidence and risk factors in a population -based prospective cohort study. Carroll K, Murad S, Eliahoo J, Majeed A, Heal Stat Q 2001 12 18 26
4. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJH, Disabil Rehabil 1999 21 357 364 10.1080/096382899297459 10503976
5. Factors influencing stroke survivors quality of life during subacute recovery. Nicholls-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S, Stroke 2005 36 1480 1484 10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f 15947263
6. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, Bohannon R, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003 17 220 226 10.1177/0888439003259415 14677218
7. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A, Lancet Neurol 2009 8 741 751 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4 19608100
8. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: A critical review of the literature. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC, Physiotherapy 1999 85 377 391 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)67198-2
9. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Kwakkel G, Disabil Rehabil 2006 26 823 830
10. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Oujamaa L, Rlave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier J-Y, Annu Phys Rehabil Med 2009 52 269 293
11. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Dobkin BH, Lancet Neurol 2004 3 528 536 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00851-8 15324721
12. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome of the upper extremity in stroke. De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G, Rehabil Med 2005 37 65 74 10.1080/16501970410024190
13. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review. De Kroon JR, van der Lee JH, IJzerman MJ, Clin Rehabil 2002 16 350 360 10.1191/0269215502cr504oa 12061468
14. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 111 121 17876068
15. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. Sveistrup H, NeuroEng Rehabil 2004 1 10 10.1186/1743-0003-1-10
16. Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. Johnson MJ, NeuroEng Rehabil 2006 3 29 10.1186/1743-0003-3-29
17. Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: A systematic review. Meilink A, Hemmen B, Seelen HAM, Kwakkel G, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 291 305 10.1177/0269215507083368 18390973
18. Zhang D, Guan TH, Widjaja F, Ang WT, Functional electrical stimulation in rehabilitation engineering: A survey Singapore 2007
19. Feasibility of EMG-based neural network controller for an upper extremity neuroprosthesis. Hincapie JG, Kirsch RF, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009 17 80 90 19211327
20. Functional restoration of elbow extension after spinal-cord injury using a neural network-based synergistic FES controller. Giuffrida JP, Crago PE, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005 13 147 152 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847375 16003892
21. A survey of iterative learning control a learning-based method for high-performance tracking control. Bristow DA, Tharayil M, Alleyne AG, IEEE Control Syst Mag 2006 26 96 114
22. Iterative Learning Control in Healthcare Electrical Stimulation and Robotic-assisted Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Rogers E, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Meadmore KL, IEEE Contr Syst Mag 2012 32 1 18 43
23. Freeman CT, Tong D, Meadmore KL, Hughes AM, Rogers E, Burridge JH, FES based Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb using Input/Output Linearization and ILC Montréal 2012 In press
24. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 559 568 10.1177/1545968308328718 19190087
25. Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010 20 465 476 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.08.001
26. Iterative learning control of FES applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Control Eng Pract 2009 17 368 381 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.08.003
27. Identification of electrically stimulated muscle models of stroke patients. Le F, Markovsky I, Freeman CT, Rogers E, Control Eng Pract 2010 18 396 407 10.1016/j.conengprac.2009.12.007
28. Upper limb stroke rehabilitation: The effectiveness of stimulation assistance through iterative learning (SAIL). Meadmore KL, Cai Z, Tong D, Hughes A-M, Freeman CT, Rogers E, Burridge JH, IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) Zurich, Switzerland 2011
29. Phase Lead Iterative Learning Control Algorithms for Functional Electrical Stimulation based Stroke Rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Tong D, Meadmore KL, Cai Z, Rogers E, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Proc IME Part I: J Syst Contr Eng 2011 225 6 850 859
30. A performance for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Lyle RC, Int J Rehabil Res 1981 4 483 492 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001 7333761
31. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S, Scand J Rehabil Med 1975 7 13 31 1135616
32. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatal neglect. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987 68 98 102 3813864
33. Patterns of Eye Movements during Cancellation Tasks in Stroke Patients Exhibiting Hemispatial Neglect. Leyland L, Meadmore KL, Godwin HJ, Benson V, Burridge JH, Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Rogers E, Liversedge SP, 10thEuropean Conference on Eye Movements Marseille, France 2011
34. The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 14 19 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668 11239280
35. Comparison of the action research arm test and the fugl-meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 962 966 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036 16813784
36. A model of the upper extremity using FES for stroke rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, ASME J Biomech Eng 2009 131 3 031011 10.1115/1.3005332
37. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Matthews JNS, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P, BMJ 1990 300 230 235 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230 2106931