Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: A systematic review of the literature

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 291-305

  Meilink, A ^a   Hemmen, B ^b   Seelen, H A M ^b   Kwakkel, G ^c,d  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Adelante Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST; BOX AND BLOCK MANIPULATION TEST; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EFFECT SIZE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXTENSOR MUSCLE; FINGER; FUGL MEYER MOTOR ASSESSMENT SCALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HAND PARESTHESIA; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; OBJECT MANIPULATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY EVIDENCE DATABASE SCALE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WRIST;

ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HAND; HUMANS; PARESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE;

EID: 43549118634     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215507083368     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Rijken PM, Dekker J. Clinical experience of rehabilitation therapists with chronic disease: a quantitative approach. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 143-50.
2. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Langton Hewer RL. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714-19.
3. Sunderland A, Tinson DJ, Bradley L, Langton Hewer RL. Arm function after stroke: an evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 1267-72.
4. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb. The impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181-86.
5. Nakayama H, Jorgenson HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394-98.
6. Duncan P, Badke M. Stroke rehabilitation: the recovery of motor control. Year Book Medical Publishers, 1988.
7. Fritz SL, Light KE, Patterson TS, Behrman AL, Davis SB. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with herniparesis after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 1172-77.
8. Chae J, Bethoux F, Bohine T, Dobos L, Davis T, Friedl A. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. Stroke 1998; 29: 975-79.
9. Powell J, Pandyan AD, Granat M, Cameron M, Stott DJ. Electrical stimulation of wrist extensors in poststroke hemiplegia. Stroke 1999; 30: 1384-89.
10. de Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Electrical stimulation of the extensors of the hand versus alternate stimulation of flexors and extensors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 592-600.
11. King TI. The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in reducing tone. Am J Occup Ther 1996; 40: 62-64.
12. Pandyan AD, Granat MH, Stott DJ. Effects of electrical stimulation on flexion contractures in the hemiplegic wrist. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 123-30.
13. Bowman BR, Baker LL, Waters RL. Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 497-502.
14. Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers TC. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 549-53.
15. Chae J, Yu D. Neuromuscular stimulation for motor relearning in hemiplegia. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1999; 11: 279-97.
16. van Overeem Hansen G. EMG-controlled functional electrical stimulation of the paretic hand. Scand J Rehabil Med 1979; 11: 189-93.
17. Bolton DAE, Cauraugh JH, Hausenblas HA. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2004; 223: 121-27.
18. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833-62.
19. WHO. Stroke - 1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report on the WHO task force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407-31.
20. De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 65-74.
21. PEDro. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Accessed 18 November 2004, from http://www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au
22. Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Moseley AM. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther 2000; 5: 223-26.
23. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 713-21.
24. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for research synthesis. Academic Press Inc., 1985.
25. Hedges LV. Fixed effects models. In Cooper LV, Hedges LV. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 285-300.
26. Shadish WR, Haddock CK. Combining estimates of effect size. In Cooper HM, Hedges LV eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 261-82.
27. Raudenbush SW. Random effects model. In Cooper H, Hedges LV. eds. The handbook of research synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, 1994: 301-23.
28. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-60.
29. Hall JA, Rosenthal R. Interpreting and evaluating meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 1995; 18: 393-407.
30. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 1960-66.
31. Gabr U, Levine P, Page SJ. Home-based electromyography-triggered stimulation in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 737-45.
32. De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Electrical stimulation of the upper limb in stroke: stimulation of the hand vs. alternate stimulation of flexors and extensors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 83: 592-600.
33. Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 570-75.
34. Cauraugh JH, Light K, Kim S, Thigpen M, Behrman A. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke 2000; 31: 1360-64.
35. Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke 2002; 33: 1589-94.
36. Cauraugh JH, Kim S. Chronic stroke motor recovery: duration of active neuromuscular stimulation. J Neurol Sci 2003; 15: 13-19.
37. Cauraugh JH, Kim S, Duley A. Coupled bilateral movements and active neuromuscular stimulation: intralimb transfer evidence during bimanual aiming. Neurosci Lett 2005; 382: 39-44.
38. Hemmen B, Seelen HA. Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm-hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase. Clin Rehabil 2007; 21: 587-94.
39. Hummelsheim H, Amberger S, Mauritz KH. The influence of EMG-initiated electrical muscle stimulation on motor recovery of the centrally paretic hand. Eur J Neurol 1996; 3: 245-54.
40. Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 220-27.
41. Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in comparison of therapy. I: Medical. Stat Med 1989; 8: 441-54.
42. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994; 25: 1181-88.
43. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529-39.
44. Pomeroy VM, King L, Pollock A, Baily-Hallam A, Langhorne P. Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 19: CD003241.
45. Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey LL, Lojovich JM, Carey JR. Electrical stimulation driving functional improvements and cortical changes in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res 2004; 154: 450-60.
46. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 122-25.
47. Ward NS. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J 2005; 81: 510-14.
48. Butefisch CM, Netz J, Wessling M, Seitz RJ, Homberg V. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain 2003; 126: 470-81.
49. Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 2006; 129: 809-19.
50. Stewart KC, Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2006; 15: 89-95.
51. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 1: 2095-104.