Computer-aided detection of breast masses depicted on full-field digital mammograms: A performance assessment

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 85, Issue 1014, 2012, Pages

  Zheng, Bin ^a   Sumkin, J H ^a   Zuley, M L ^a   Lederman, D ^a   Wang, X ^a   Gur, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST SURGERY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EXCISION; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; RADIOLOGIST; SCREEN FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84861859274     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/51461617     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Freer TM, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-6. (Pubitemid 32799990)
2. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:185-90. (Pubitemid 38263177)
3. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005;237:444-9. (Pubitemid 41507878)
4. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187: 1483-91. (Pubitemid 44788678)
5. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-409. (Pubitemid 46556325)
6. Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beeknan M, Visser R, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009;253: 353-8.
7. Nishikawa RM, Kallergi M. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography (point/counterpoint). Med Phys 2006;33: 811-14.
8. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, Hakim CM, Hardesty LA, Gur D. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted diagnosis cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001;221:633-40. (Pubitemid 33101753)
9. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001;11: 2454-9. (Pubitemid 33114897)
10. Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol 2002;12:3015-17. (Pubitemid 36940426)
11. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul LG, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:687-93. (Pubitemid 37021836)
12. Gur D, Stalder JS,Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Chough D, et al. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology 2004; 233:418-23. (Pubitemid 39423800)
13. The JS, Schilling KJ, Hoffmeister JW, Friedmann E, McGinnis R, Holcomb RG. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:337-40.
14. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, et al. Screening mammography - detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Radiology 2007;244:104-11. (Pubitemid 46981963)
15. Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2011;77:457-61.
16. Wei J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Ge J, Roubidoux MA, et al. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Acad Radiol 2007;14:659-69. (Pubitemid 46900805)
17. Li H, Giger M, Yuan Y, Chen W, Horsch K, Lan L, et al. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1437-45.
18. Zheng B, Chang YH, Gur D. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. Acad Radiol 1995;2:959-66.
19. Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, Gur D. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment. Acad Radiol 2000;7:595-602. (Pubitemid 30602826)
20. Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Adequacy testing of training set sample sizes in the development of a computer-assisted diagnosis scheme. Acad Radiol 1997;4:497-502. (Pubitemid 127500322)
21. Metz CE. ROCKIT 0.9B beta version. Available from: http://www.radiology. uchicago.edu/krl/.
22. Zheng B, Shah R, Wallace L, Hakim C, Ganott MA, Gur D. Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images. Acad Radiol 2002;9:1245-50. (Pubitemid 35265395)
23. Zheng B, Leader JK, Abrams GS, Sumkin JH, Hakim CM, Ganott MA, et al. Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses. Med Phys 2006;33:3135-43. (Pubitemid 44327413)
24. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE, Yin FF, Vyborny CJ, et al. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 1994;21:265-9. (Pubitemid 24068791)
25. Kundel HL, Revesz G. Lesion conspicuity, structure noise, and film reader error. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976;126:1233-8.
26. Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering. Med Phys 2001;28:2302-8. (Pubitemid 33095564)
27. Chang YH, Good WF, Leader JK, Wang XH, Zheng B, Hardesty LA, et al. Integrated density of a lesion: a quantitative, mammographically derived, invariable measure. Med Phys 2003;30:1805-11. (Pubitemid 36885798)
28. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O'Shaughnessy KF, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-62. (Pubitemid 30237859)
29. Ho WT, Lam PW. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 2003;58:133-6. (Pubitemid 36221673)