Computer-aided detection in mammography: An assessment of performance on current and prior images

Academic Radiology

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1245-1250

  Zheng, Bin ^a   Shah, Ratan ^a   Wallace, Luisa ^a   Hakim, Christiane ^a   Ganott, Marie A ^a   Gur, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast radiography; Breast, calcification; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0036840738     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80557-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Mettlin C. Global breast cancer mortality statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1999; 49:135-137.
2. Rennie J, Rusting R. Making headway against cancer. Sci Am 1996; 3:56-59.
3. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:29-33.
4. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
5. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AS. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191:241-244.
6. Hendee WR. Proposition: All mammograms should be double-read. Med Phys 1999; 26:115-117.
7. Beam CA, Sullivan DC, Layde PM. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:891-897.
8. Malich A, Azhari T, Bohm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Reproducibility: An important factor determining the quality of computer aided detection (CAD) systems. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36:170-174.
9. Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215:554-562.
10. Malich A, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:2454-2459.
11. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781-786.
12. Moberg K, Bjurstam N, Wilczek B, Rostgard L, Egge E, Muren C. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2001; 39:104-110.
13. Zheng B, Ganott MA, Britton CA, et al. Soft-copy mammographic reading with different computer-assisted detection cueing environments: Preliminary findings. Radiology 2001; 221:633-640.
14. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219:192-202.
15. Zheng B, Chang YH, Staiger M, Good WF, Gur D. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:655-662.
16. Zheng B, Chang YH, Gur D. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. Acad Radiol 1995; 2:959-966.
17. Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, Maitz GS, Chang YH, Gur D. Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression. Acad Radiol 2000; 7:595-602.
18. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1033-1053.
19. Nishikawa RM, Giger ML, Doi K, Yin FF, Metz CE, Schmidt RA. Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys 1994; 21:265-269.
20. Zheng B, Chang YH, Good WF, Gur D. Performance gain in computer-assisted detection schemes by averaging scores generated from artificial neural networks with adaptive filtering. Med Phys 2001; 28:2302-2308.
21. Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JH. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. Radiology 1998; 207:465-471.
22. Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA. Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. Med Phys 2001; 28:2309-2317.
23. Lewin JM, Hendric RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001; 218:873-880.
24. Venta LA, Hendrick RE, Adler YT, et al. Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and screenfilm mammography in a diagnostic setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1241-1248.