Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 457-461

  Sadaf, Arifa ^a   Crystal, Pavel ^a   Scaranelo, Anabel ^b   Helbich, Thomas ^c  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer assisted detection; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 79952990329     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. L. Nyström, I. Andersson, N. Bjurstam, J. Frisell, B. Nordenskjöld, and L.E. Rutqvist Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lancet 359 2002 909 919 [Erratum, Lancet 2002; 360:724.] (Pubitemid 34246378)
2. D. Schopper, and C de Wolf How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence Eur J Cancer 45 11 2009 Epub 2009 Apr 22. Review. PMID: 1939832
3. M. Funovics, S. Schamp, and T.H. Helbich Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma Rofo 173 March (3) 2001 218 223 (Pubitemid 32239990)
4. R.F. Brem, J. Baum, and M. Lechner Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 2003 687 693 (Pubitemid 37021836)
5. T.E. Cupples, J.E. Cunningham, and J.C. Reynolds Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program AJR Am J Roentgenol 185 2005 944 950
6. R.L. Birdwell, P. Bandodkar, and D.M. Ikeda Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting Radiology 236 2005 451 457 (Pubitemid 41023425)
7. L.A. Khoo, P. Taylor, and R.M. Civen-Wilson Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study Radiology 237 2005 444 449 (Pubitemid 41507878)
8. M.J. Morton, D.H. Whaley, K.R. Brandt, and K.K. Amrami Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection - prospective evaluation Radiology 239 2006 375 383
9. J.M. Ko, M.J. Nicholas, J.B. Mendel, and P.J. Slanetz Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 2006 1483 1491 (Pubitemid 44788678)
10. F.J. Gilbert, S.M. Astley, and M.G.C. Gillan Single Reading with Computer-Aided Detection for Screening Mammography N Engl J Med 359 October (16) 2008 1675 1684
11. E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, and E. Hendrick Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 17 2005 1773 1783 (Pubitemid 41549889)
12. T.M. Haygood, G.J. Whitman, E.N. Atkinson, R.G. Nikolova, S.Y. Sandoval, and P.J. Dempsey Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS J Am Coll Radiol 5 April (4) 2008 585 592 (Pubitemid 351417454)
13. EA Berns, RE Hendrick, and M Solari Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 2006 38 41 (Pubitemid 46100142)
14. T.M. Haygood, J. Wang, and E.N. Atkinson Timed efficiency of interpretation of digital and film-screen screening mammograms AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 January (1) 2009 216 220
15. T.M. Haygood, J. Wang, and D. Lane Why does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation J Digit Imaging February 2009 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 19214635, doi:10.1007/s10278- 009-9177-9
16. F. Baum, U. Fischer, S. Obenauer, and E. Grabbe Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results Eur Radiol 12 December (12) 2002 3015 3017 [Epub 2002 June 12] (Pubitemid 36940426)
17. S.J. Kim, W.K. Moon, and N. Cho Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views Radiology 241 2006 695 701 (Pubitemid 46190534)
18. P. Skaane, A. Kshirsagar, S. Stapleton, K. Young, and R.A. Castellino Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 February (2) 2007 377 384 (Pubitemid 46167738)
19. S.K. Yang, W.K. Moon, and N. Cho Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms Radiology 244 2007 104 111 (Pubitemid 46981963)
20. S.J. Kim, W.K. Moon, N. Cho, J.H. Cha, S.M. Kim, and J.G. Im Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations Radiology 246 January (1) 2008 71 80 (Pubitemid 350305028)
21. B. Brancato, N. Houssami, and D. Francesca Does computer-aided detection (CAD) contribute to the performance of digital mammography in a self-referred population? Breast Cancer Res Treat 111 September (2) 2008 373 376 [Epub 2007 October 16]
22. J.S. The, K.J. Schilling, J.W. Hoffmeister, E. Friedmann, R. McGinnis, and R.G. Holcomb Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 February (2) 2009 337 340
23. F.J. van den Biggelaar, A.G. Kessels, J.M. van Engelshoven, C. Boetes, and K. Flobbe Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists Breast Cancer Res Treat May 2009 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 19418215, doi:10.1007/s10549-009- 0409-y
24. R.M. Nishikawa, and L.L. Pesce Computer-aided detection evaluation methods are not created equal Radiology 251 June (3) 2009 634 636
25. B. Boyer, C. Balleyguier, O. Granat, and C. Pharaboz CAD in questions/answers review of the literature Eur J Radiol 69 January (1) 2009 24 33 [Epub 2008 October 31]
26. American College of Radiology BI-RADS: mammography Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: BI-RADS Atlas fourth ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
27. R.F. Brem, J.W. Hoffmeister, and J.A. Rapelyea Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 February (2) 2005 439 444 (Pubitemid 46657247)
28. R.F. Brem, J.W. Hoffmeister, G. Zisman, M.P. DeSimio, and S.K. Rogers A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 March (3) 2005 893 896 (Pubitemid 43899518)
29. M.S. Soo, E.L. Rosen, J.Q. Xia, S. Ghate, and J.A. Baker Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 March (3) 2005 887 892 (Pubitemid 43899517)
30. R.F. Brem, J.A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, J.W. Hoffmeister, and M.P. Desimio Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology Cancer 104 September (5) 2005 931 935 (Pubitemid 41170219)
31. S. Ciatto, M.R. Del Turco, and G. Risso Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography Eur J Radiol 45 February (2) 2003 135 138 (Pubitemid 36092135)