Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes

Neuroscience

Volumn 214, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-13

  Rattay, F ^a   Paredes, L P ^a   Leao, R N ^b,c  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Activating function; Chronaxie; Electrical stimulation; Microelectrode; Strength duration curve

Indexed keywords

SODIUM CHANNEL NAV1.2; SODIUM CHANNEL NAV1.6; VOLTAGE GATED POTASSIUM CHANNEL;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CHRONAXY; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HYPERPOLARIZATION; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROELECTRODE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE FIBER MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; RANVIER NODE; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALS; CHRONAXY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; HIPPOCAMPUS; INTRACELLULAR FLUID; MEMBRANE POTENTIALS; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROELECTRODES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861830521     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Behrend M.R., Ahuja A.K., Humayun M.S., Chow R.H., Weiland J.D. Resolution of the epiretinal prosthesis is not limited by electrode size. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011, 19:436-442.
2. Blair H.A. On the measure of excitability. J Gen Physiol 1932, 16:165-175.
3. Boinagrov D., Loudin J., Palanker D. Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104:2236-2248.
4. Borchers S., Himmelbach M., Logothetis N., Karnath H. Direct electrical stimulation of human cortex - the gold standard for mapping brain functions?. Nature Rev Neurosci 2012, 13:63-70.
5. Brindley G.S. The site of electrical excitation of the human eye. J Physiol 1955, 127:189-200.
6. Carnevale N.T., Hines M.L. The NEURON book 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. Cohen E.D. Prosthetic interfaces with the visual system: biological issues. J Neural Eng 2007, 4:R14-R31.
8. Cole K.S. Membranes, ions and impulses 1968, University of California Press, Berkley.
9. De Vries J., De Jongste M.J., Spincemaille G., Staal M.J. Spinal cord stimulation for ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2007, 32:63-89.
10. Dowling J. Artificial human vision. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005, 2:73-85.
11. Fernández E., Pelayo F., Romero S., Bongard M., Marin C., Alfaro A., Merabet L. Development of a cortical visual neuroprosthesis for the blind: the relevance of neuroplasticity. J Neural Eng 2005, 2:R1-R12.
12. Fried S.I., Hsueh H.A., Werblin F.S. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 2006, 95:970-978.
13. Fried S.I., Lasker A.C., Desai N.J., Eddington D.K., Rizzo J.F. Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 2009, 101:1972-1987.
14. Geddes L.A. Accuracy limitations of chronaxie values. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51:176-181.
15. Gerhardt M., Groeger G., MacCarthy N. Monopolar vs. bipolar subretinal stimulation - an in vitro study. J Neurosci Methods 2011, 199:26-34.
16. Greenberg R.J., Velte T.J., Humayun M.S., Scarlatis G.N., Juan E. A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999, 46:505-514.
17. Hines M.L., Morse T., Migliore M., Carnevale N.T., Shepherd G.M. ModelDB: a database to support computational neuroscience. J Comput Neurosci 2004, 17(1):7-11.
18. Hodgkin A.L., Huxley A.F., Katz B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol 1952, 115:424-448.
19. Holsheimer J., Buitenweg J.R., Das J., de Sutter P., Manola L., Nuttin B. The effect of pulse width and contact configuration on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2011, 68:1452-1461.
20. Horsager A., Greenwald S.H., Weiland J.D., Humayun M.S., Greenberg R.J., McMahon M.J., Boynton G.M., Fine I. Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009, 50:1483-1491.
21. Hu W., Tian C., Li T., Yang M., Hou H., Shu Y. Distinct contributions of Nav1.6 and Nav1.2 in action potential initiation and backpropagation. Nat Neurosci 2009, 12:996-1002.
22. Iles J.F. Simple models of stimulation of neurones in the brain by electric fields. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2005, 87:17-31.
23. Jensen R.J., Ziv O.R., Rizzo J.F. Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 46:1486-1496.
24. Keren N., Bar-Yehuda D., Korngreen A. Experimentally guided modelling of dendritic excitability in rat neocortical pyramidal neurones. J Physiol 2009, 587:1413-1437.
25. Lapicque L. Recherches quantitatives sur l'excitation électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J Physiol Pathol Gen 1907, 49:620-635.
26. Lapicque L. The chronaxic switching in the nervous system. Science 1929, 70:151-154.
27. Leao R.N., Leao F.N., Walmsley B. Non-random nature of spontaneous mIPSCs in mouse auditory brainstem neurons revealed by recurrence quantification analysis. Proc Biol Sci 2005, 272:2551-2559.
28. Leao R.N., Tan H.M., Fisahn A. Kv7/KCNQ channels control action potential phasing of pyramidal neurons during hippocampal gamma oscillations in vitro. J Neurosci 2009, 29:13353-13364.
29. Mainen Z.F., Joerges J., Hugenard J.R., Sejnowski T.J. A model of spike initiation in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Neuron 1995, 15:1427-1439.
30. 2+ release events in the dendrites of pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 2009, 29:7833-7845.
31. Migliore M., Shepherd G.M. Emerging rules for the distributions of active dendritic conductances. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:362-370.
32. Minassian K., Persy I., Rattay F., Pinter M.M., Kern H., Dimitrijevic M.R. Human lumbar cord circuitries can be activated by extrinsic tonic input to generate locomotor-like activity. Hum Mov Sci 2007, 26:275-295.
33. Miocinovic S., Grill W.M. Sensitivity of temporal excitation properties to the neuronal element activated by extracellular stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 132:91-99.
34. Nowak L.G., Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I: Evidence from chronaxie measurements. Exp Brain Res 1998, 118:477-488.
35. Palmer L.M., Stuart G.J. Site of action potential initiation in layer 5 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 2006, 26:1854-1863.
36. Pezaris J.S., Reid R.C. Simulations of electrode placement for a thalamic visual prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009, 56:172-178.
37. Ranck J.B. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res 1975, 98:417-440.
38. Rattay F. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1986, 33:974-977.
39. Rattay F. Ways to approximate current-distance relations for electrically stimulated fibers. J Theor Biol 1987, 125:339-349.
40. Rattay F. Electrical nerve stimulation: theory, experiments and applications 1990, Springer, Vienna.
41. Rattay F. The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience 1999, 89:335-346.
42. Rattay F., Minassian K., Dimitrijevic M.R. Epidural electrical stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbosacral cord. 2: Quantitative analysis by computer modeling. Spinal Cord 2000, 38:473-489.
43. Rattay F., Resatz S. Effective electrode configuration for selective stimulation with inner eye prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51:1659-1664.
44. Rattay F., Wenger C. Which elements of the mammalian central nervous system are excited by low current stimulation with microelectrodes?. Neuroscience 2010, 170:399-407.
45. Reilly J.P. Electrical stimulation and electropathology 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.
46. Roth B.J. A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995, 42:1174-1184.
47. Rushton W.A.H. The effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve. J Physiol 1927, 63:357-377.
48. Sekirnjak C., Hottowy P., Sher A., Dabrowski W., Litke A.M., Chichilnisky E.J. High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci 2008, 28:4446-4456.
49. Shepherd R.K., Hardie N.A., Baxi J.H. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: single neuron strength-duration functions in deafened animals. Ann Biomed Eng 2001, 29:195-201.
50. Sjöström P.J., Rancz E.A., Roth A., Häusser M. Dendritic excitability and synaptic plasticity. Physiol Rev 2008, 88:769-840.
51. Smith D.W., Finley C.C. Effects of electrode configuration on psychophysical strength-duration functions for single biphasic electrical stimuli in cats. J Acoust Soc Am 1997, 102:2228-2237.
52. Spruston N. Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:206-221.
53. Stuart G., Spruston N., Sakmann B., Häusser M. Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian CNS. Trends Neurosci 1997, 20:125-131.
54. Suarez-Antola RE (2005) The time constants for the electric stimulation of nerve and muscle fibers by point electrodes. In: Proceeding of the 2nd IEEE EMBS conference on neural engineering. Arlington, Virginia, pp. 652-655.
55. Tehovnik E.J., Slocum W.M., Smirnakis S.M., Tolias A.S. Microstimulation of visual cortex to restore vision. Prog Brain Res 2009, 175:347-375.
56. Voorhees C.R., Voorhees W.D., Geddes L.A., Bourland J.D., Hinds M. The chronaxie for myocardium and motor nerve in the dog with chest-surface electrodes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992, 39:624-628.
57. Warman E.N., Grill W.M., Durand D. Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: determination of excitation thresholds. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992, 39:1244-1254.
58. Weiss G. Sur la possibilité de rendre comparables entre eux les appareils servant a l'excitation électrique. Arch Ital Biol 1901, 35:413-446.
59. West D.C., Wolstencroft J.H. Strength-duration characteristics of myelinated and non-myelinated bulbospinal axons in the cat spinal cord. J Physiol 1983, 337:37-50.
60. Wongsarnpigoon A., Woock J.P., Grill W.M. Efficiency analysis of waveform shape for electrical excitation of nerve fibers. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010, 18:319-328.
61. Yu Y., Shu Y., McCormick D.A. Cortical action potential backpropagation explains spike threshold variability and rapid-onset kinetics. J Neurosci 2008, 28:7260-7272.
62. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision?. Science 2002, 295:1022-1025.