Insight into pattern of codon biasness and nucleotide base usage in serotonin receptor gene family from different mammalian species

Gene

Volumn 503, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 92-100

  Dass, J Febin Prabhu ^a   Sudandiradoss, C ^a  

^a VIT UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

5 HT family; Codon usage bias; Compositional mutation bias; Correspondence analysis; Gene function; Serotonin receptors

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; NUCLEIC ACID BASE; SEROTONIN RECEPTOR; URACIL;

ARTICLE; CODON USAGE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; MAMMAL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CODON; DATABASES, GENETIC; DOGS; GUINEA PIGS; HORSES; HUMANS; MICE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NUCLEOTIDES; OPOSSUMS; PRIMATES; RATS; RECEPTORS, SEROTONIN; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84861790274     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.03.057     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W., Lipman D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215:403-410.
2. Andres A.M., de Hemptinne C., Bertranpetit J. Heterogeneous rate of protein evolution in serotonin genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:2707-2715.
3. Anthony J.H., et al. IUPHAR-DB: the IUPHAR database of G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:680-685.
4. Araxi O.U., Laurence D.H. Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. Genetics 2001, 159:1191-1199.
5. Bailly-Bechet M., Danchin A., Iqbal M., Marsili M., Vergassola M. Codon usage domains over bacterial chromosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2(4):e37.
6. Barnes N.M., Sharp T. A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38:1083-1152.
7. Carrie A.W., Yu S., Johannesson H. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in Neurospora tetrasperma and Neurospora discreta. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3:332-343.
8. Chiapello H., Lisacek F., Caboche M., Henaut A. Codon usage and gene function are related in sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 1998, 209:1-38.
9. Chiusano M.L., et al. Second codon positions of genes and the secondary structures of proteins. Relationships and implications for the origin of the genetic code. Gene 2000, 261(1):63-69.
10. Duan Jubao, Antezana Marcos A. Mammalian mutation pressure, synonymous codon choice, and mRNA degradation. J. Mol. Evol. 2003, 57:694-701.
11. Duret L. tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. Trends Genet. 2000, 16:287-289.
12. Duret L., Mouchiroud D. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1999, 96(8):4482-4487.
13. Duret L., Mouchiroud D. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2000, 17(1):68-74.
14. Emily H.M.W., David K.S., Raul R., Malik P., Leo L.M.P. Codon usage bias and the evolution of influenza A viruses. Codon usage biases of influenza virus. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10,253.
15. Engelman D.M., Steitz T.A., Goldman A. Identifying nonpolar transbilayer helices in amino acid sequences of membrane proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 1986, 15:321-353.
16. Epstein R.J., Lin Kui, Tan TinWee A functional significance for codon third bases. Gene 2000, 245:291-298.
17. Eyre-Walker A. An analysis of codon usage in mammals: selection or mutation bias?. J. Mol. Evol. 1991, 33:442-449.
18. Eyre-Walker A. Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1996, 13(6):864-872.
19. Fredriksson R., et al. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol. Pharmacol. 2003, 63(6):1256-1272.
20. Freire-Picos M.A., Gonzalez-Sisco M.I., Rodriguez-Torres A.M., Ramil E., Cerdan M.E. Codon usage in Kluyveromyces lactisand in yeast cytochrome C-encoding genes. Gene 1994, 139:43-49.
21. Fuglsang A. Strong associations between gene function and codon usage. Apmis 2003, 111(9):843-847.
22. Gautier C. Compositional bias in DNA. Curr. Opin. Genet. 2000, 10:656-661.
23. Gingold H., Pilpel Y. Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 12:481.
24. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Mercier R., Pavé A. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8:49-62.
25. Greenacre M.J. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis 1984, Academic Press, London, UK.
26. Grosjean H., Fiers W. Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed gene. Gene 1982, 18:199-209.
27. Gu W.J., Zhou T., Ma J.M., Sun X., Lu Z.H. The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure in Escherichia coli and Homo sapiens. Biosystems 2004, 73:89-97.
28. Heger A., Ponting C.P. Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species. Genetics 2007, 177(3):1337-1348.
29. Hershberg R., Petrov D.A. General rules for optimal codon choice. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5(7):e1000556.
30. Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundances of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translation system. J. Mol. Biol. 1981, 151:573-597.
31. Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1985, 2:13-34.
32. Iwama H., Gojobori T. Identification of neurotransmitter receptor genes under significantly relaxed selective constraint by orthologous gene comparisons between humans and rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19(11):1891-1901.
33. Kanaya S., et al. Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis. Gene 1999, 238(1):143-155.
34. Karlin S., Mrazek J. What drives codon choices in human genes?. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 262(4):459-472.
35. Karlin S., Campbell A.M., Mrazek J. Comparative DNA analysis across diverse genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1998, 32:185-225.
36. Liu Q., Dou S., Ji Z., Xue Q. Synonymous codon usage and gene function are strongly related in Oryza sativa. Biosystems 2005, 80(2):123-131.
37. Liu G., Wu J., Yang H., Bao Q. Codon usage patterns in Corynebacterium glutamicum: mutational bias, natural selection and amino acid conservation. Comp. Funct. Genomics 2010, 2010:343-569.
38. Lucki I. The spectrum of behaviors influenced by serotonin. Biol. Psychiatry 1998, 44:151-162.
39. Ma J.M., Zhou T., Gu W.J., Sun X., Lu Z.H. Cluster analysis of the codon use frequency of MHC genes from different species. Biosystems 2002, 65:199-207.
40. Ma J., Nguyen M.N., Rajapakse J.C. Gene classification using codon usage and support vector machines. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2009, 6(1):134-143.
41. McWeeney S.K., Valdes A.M. Codon usage bias and base composition in MHC genes in humans and common chimpanzees. Immunogenetics 1999, 49:272-279.
42. Meltzer H.Y., Li Z., Kaneda Y., Ichikawa J. Serotonin receptors: their key role in drugs to treat schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2003, 27(7):1159-1172.
43. Merkl R. A survey of codon and amino acid frequency bias in microbial genomes focusing on translational efficiency. J. Mol. Evol. 2003, 57:453-466.
44. Metzger K.J., Thomas M.A. Evidence of positive selection at codon sites localized in extracellular domains of mammalian CC motif chemokine receptor proteins. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:139.
45. Nichols D.E., Nichols C.D. Serotonin receptors. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:1614-1641.
46. Palidwor G.A., Perkins T.J., Xia X. A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13431.
47. Paul M.S., Wen-Hsiung L. An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J. Mol. Evol. 1986, 24(1):28-38.
48. Peroutka S.J., Howell T.A. The molecular evolution of G protein-coupled receptors: focus on 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. Neuropharmacology 1994, 33:319-324.
49. Plotkin J.B., Kudla G. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:32-42.
50. Prilusky J., Bibi E. Studying membrane proteins through the eyes of the genetic code revealed a strong uracil bias in their coding mRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106(16):6662-6666.
51. Qin Z., Sheng Z., Hong C., Xiaolin L., Li Z., Fei L. Analysis of the codon use frequency of AMPK family genes from different species. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36:513-519.
52. Rao Y., Wu G., Wang Z., Chai X., Nie Q., Zhang X. Mutation bias is the driving force of codon usage in the Gallus gallus genome. DNA Res. 2011, 18(6):499-512.
53. Samuel K., Jan M. Compositional differences within and between eukaryotic genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1994, 94:10227-10232.
54. Sharp P.M., Li W.H. The codon adaptation index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 5:1281-1295.
55. Sharp P.M., Tuohy T.M., Mosurski K.R. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14:5125-5143.
56. Sharp P.M., Cowe E., Higgins D.G. Codon usage patterns in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens: a review of the considerable within-species diversity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16:8207-8211.
57. Sharp P.M., et al. Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both?. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1993, 21(4):835-841.
58. Sharp P.M., Averof M., Lloyd A.T., Matassi G., Peden J.F. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1995, 349:241-247.
59. Sharp P.M., Emery L.R., Zeng K. Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 365(1544):1203-1212.
60. Smith N.G., Hurst L.D. The causes of synonymous ratevariation in the rodent genome. Can substitution rates be used to estimate the sex bias in mutation rate. Genetics 1999, 152:661-673.
61. Stenico M., Lloyd A.T., Sharp P.M. Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22:2437-2446.
62. Su, et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101(16):6062-6067.
63. Sueoka N., Kawanishi Y. DNA G+C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human gene. Gene 2000, 261:53-62.
64. Urrutia A., Hurst L. Codon usage bias covaries with expression breadth and the rate of synonymous evolution in humans, but this is not evidence for selection. Genetics 2001, 159:1191-1199.
65. Vicario S., Moriyama E.N., Powell J.R. Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 15:226.
66. Wright F. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 1990, 87(1):23-29.
67. Zhu W., Lomsadze A., Borodovsky M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 8(12):e132.