Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for source-monitoring based on the absence of information

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 284-295

  Leynes, P Andrew ^a  

^a Department of Health and Exercise Science   (United States)

Author keywords

ERPs; Reality monitoring; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROOCULOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PROCESS MONITORING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861754128     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: 18727697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ally B.A., Simons J.S., McKeever J.D., Peers P.V., Budson A.E. Parietal contributions to recollection: electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1800-1812.
2. Bink M.L., Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L. An alternative conceptualization to memory "strength" in reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:804-809.
3. Bergström Z.M., de Fockert J.W., Richardson-Klavehn A. ERP and behavioural evidence for direct suppression of unwanted memories. NeuroImage 2009, 48:726-737.
4. Bergström Z.M., de Fockert J., Richardson-Klavehn A. Event-related potential evidence that automatic recollection can be voluntarily avoided. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:1280-1301.
5. Bergström Z.A., Velmans M., de Fockert J., Richardson-Klavehn A. ERP evidence for successful voluntary avoidance of conscious recollection. Brain Research 2007, 1151:119-133.
6. Blakemore S.J., Smith J., Steel R., Johnstone E.C., Frith C.D. The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychological Medicine 2000, 30:1131-1139.
7. Cabeza R. Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: the dual attentional process hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1813-1827.
8. Cabeza R., Ciaramelli E., Olson I.R., Moscovitch M. The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2008, 9:613-625.
9. Dobbins I.G., Simons J.S., Schacter D.L. fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:908-920.
10. Dodson C.S., Johnson M.K. Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1996, 125:181-194.
11. Elward R.L., Wilding E.L. Working memory capacity is related to variations in the magnitude of an electrophysiological marker of recollection. Brain Research 2010, 1342:55-62.
12. Evans L.H., Wilding E.L., Hibbs C.S., Herron J.E. An electrophysiological study of boundary conditions for control of recollection in the exclusion task. Brain Research 2010, 1324:43-53.
13. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Bersick M. The late negative episodic memory effect: the effect of recapitulating study details at test. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23:185-198.
14. Gallo D.A. False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:833-848.
15. Gallo D.A., McDonough I.M., Scimeca J. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:955-969.
16. Hayama H.R., Johnson J.D., Rugg M.D. The relationship between the right frontal old/new ERP effect and post-retrieval monitoring: specific or non-specific?. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:1211-1223.
17. Herron J.E. Decomposition of the late posterior negativity: effects of retrieval and response fluency. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:233-244.
18. Herron J.E., Rugg M.D. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:843-854.
19. Herron J.E., Rugg M.D. Strategic influences on recollection in the exclusion task: electrophysiological evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:703-710.
20. Hoffman H.G. Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: evidence from source attribution biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1997, 23:371-383.
21. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
22. Johansson M., Mecklinger A. The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biological Psychology 2003, 64:91-117.
23. Johansson M., Stenberg G., Lindgren M., Rosén I. Memory for perceived and imagined pictures-an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:986-1002.
24. Johnson M.K., Hashtroudi S., Lindsay D.S. Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114:3-28.
25. Johnson M.K., Raye C.L. Reality monitoring. Psychological Review 1981, 88:67-85.
26. Leynes P.A., Bink M.L. Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2002, 45:197-210.
27. Leynes P.A., Bink M.L., Marsh R.L., Allen J.D., May J.C. Test modality affects source monitoring and event-related potentials. The American Journal of Psychology 2003, 116:389-413.
28. Leynes P.A., Cairns A., Crawford J.T. Event-related potentials indicate that reality monitoring differs from external source monitoring. The American Journal of Psychology 2005, 118:497-524.
29. Leynes P.A., Crawford J.T., Bink M.L. Interrupted actions affect output monitoring and event-related potentials (ERPs). Memory 2005, 13:759-772.
30. Leynes P.A., Grey J.A., Crawford J.T. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for sensory-based action memories. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2006, 62:193-202.
31. Leynes P.A., Phillips M.C. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for varied recollection during source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:741-751.
32. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York. 2nd edn.
33. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L. Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1137-1151.
34. Mecklinger A. Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:565-582.
35. Mecklinger A., Johansson M., Parra M., Hanslmayr S. Source-retrieval requirements influence late ERP and EEG memory effects. Brain Research 2007, 1172:110-123.
36. Mitchell K.J., Johnson M.K. Source monitoring 15years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:638-677.
37. Nelson D.L., McEvoy C.L., Schreiber T.A. The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
38. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
39. Rosburg T., Mecklinger A., Johansson M. Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval orientation in reality monitoring. NeuroImage 2011, 54:3076-3084.
40. Rosburg T., Mecklinger A., Johansson M. Strategic retrieval in a reality monitoring task. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2957-2969.
41. Rugg M.D., Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:251-257.
42. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:696-703.
43. Senkfor A.J., Van Petten C., Kutas M. Episodic action memory for real objects: An ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2002, 14:402-419.
44. Slamecka N.J., Graf P. The generation effect: delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory 1978, 4:592-604.
45. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1988, 117:34-50.
46. Vilberg K.L., Moosavi R.F., Rugg M.D. The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved. Brain Research 2006, 1122:161-170.
47. Vilberg K.L., Rugg M.D. Functional significance of retrieval-related activity in lateral parietal cortex: evidence from fMRI and ERPs. Human Brain Mapping 2009, 30:1490-1501.
48. Wilding E.L. In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection?. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2000, 35:81-87.
49. Wilding E.L., Fraser C.S., Herron J.E. Indexing strategic retrieval of colour information with event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25:19-32.
50. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1185-1195.
51. Wilding E.L., Rugg M.D. An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain 1996, 119:889-905.
52. Woroch B., Gonsalves B.D. Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength. Brain Research 2010, 1317:180-191.
53. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.