Interrupted actions affect output monitoring and event-related potentials (ERPs)

Memory

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 759-772

  Leynes, P Andrew ^a   Crawford, Jarret T ^b   Bink, Martin L ^c  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY; MONITORING; PARIETAL LOBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECORDING; RESPONSE TIME; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; COGNITION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 27744465059     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210444000377     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267-281.
2. Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575-582.
3. Cohen, R. L. (1989). Memory for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychological Review, 1, 57-80.
4. Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
5. Earles, J. L., Kersten, A., Turner, J. M., & McMullen, J. (1999). Influences of age, performance, and item relatedness on verbatim and gist recall of verb-noun pairs. The Journal of General Psychology, 126, 97-110.
6. Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Foley, M. A., & Ratner, H. H. (1998). Distinguishing between memories for thoughts and deeds: The role of prospective processing in children's source monitoring. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 465-484.
8. Goff, L. M., & Roediger, H. L. (1998). Imagination inflation for action events: Repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 26, 20-33.
9. Gonsalves, B., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Brain potentials associated with recollective processing of spoken words. Memory & Cognition, 28, 321-330.
10. Guttentag, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1988). Adult age differences in memory for imagined and performed actions. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43(4), 107-108.
11. Johansson, M., Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., & Rosén, I. (2002). Memory for perceived and imagined pictures: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 986-1002.
12. Johnson, M. K., Hastroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3-28.
13. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., Mather, M., Kounios, J., Schacter, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format. Psychological Science, 8, 250-257.
14. Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., & Sheffer, D. (1988). Telling the same story twice: Output monitoring and age. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 23-39.
15. Kormi-Nouri, R. (2000). The role of movement and object in action memory: A comparative stud between blind, blindfolded and sighted subjects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 71-75.
16. Leynes, P. A. (2002). The effect of specific test queries on source monitoring event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain and Cognition, 50, 218-233.
17. Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 197-210.
18. Leynes, P. A., Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., Allen, J. D., & May, J. C. (2003). Test modality affects source monitoring and event-related potentials. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 389-413.
19. Markham, R. (1991). Development of reality monitoring for performed and imagined actions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1347-1354.
20. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
21. Mecklinger, A. (2000). Interfacing mind and brain: A neurocognitive model of recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 37, 565-582.
22. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
23. Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). The role of the prefrontal cortex during tests of episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 399-406.
24. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
25. Paller, K. A., & Kutas, M. (1992). Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(4), 375-391.
26. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. K. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6(2), 107-111.
27. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209-222.
28. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 664-678.
29. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47-69.
30. Schaefer, E. G., Kozak, M. V., & Sagness, K. (1998). The role of enactment in prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 644-650.
31. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 696-703.
32. Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (1998) Who said what: An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1005-1025.
33. Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2002). Episodic action memory for real objects: An ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 402-419.
34. Thomas, A. K., & Loftus, E. F. (2002). Creating bizarre false memories through imagination. Memory & Cognition, 30, 423-431.
35. Wilding, E. L. (1999). Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: An event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 441-454.
36. Wilding, E. L. (2000). In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 35, 81-87.
37. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
38. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997a). Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia, 35, 119-128.
39. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997b). An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1185-1195.