Event-related potentials indicate that reality monitoring differs from external source monitoring

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 497-524

  Leynes, P Andrew ^a   Cairns, Alyssa ^b   Crawford, Jarret T ^c  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

^b Bacharach Institute for Rehabilitation   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EGO; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; REALITY TESTING;

EID: 30444460577     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Blakemore, S.J., Smith, J., Steel, R., Johnstone, E. C., & Frith, C. D. (2000). The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: Evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring. Psychological Medicine, 30, 1131-1139.
2. Bornstein, B. H., & LeCompte, D. C. (1995). A comparison of item and source forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 254-259.
3. Bébion, G., Amador, X., David, A., Malaspina, D., Sharif, Z., & Gorman, J. M. (2000). Positive symptomatology and source-monitoring failure in schizophrenia: An analysis of symptom specific effects. Psychiatry Research, 95, 119-131.
4. Brébion, G., Smith, M. J., Gorman, J. M., & Amador, X. (1996). Reality monitoring failure in schizophrenia: The role of selective attention. Schizophrenia Research, 22, 173-180.
5. Cycowicz, Y. M., & Friedman, D. (2003). Source memory for the color of pictures: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) reveal sensory-specific retrieval-related activity. Psychophysiology, 40, 455-464.
6. Cycowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2001). Remembering the color of objects: An ERP investigation of source memory. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 322-334.
7. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process: Dissociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
8. Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
9. Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 56, 1145-1155.
10. Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, G. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thought and memories for speech. Child Development, 54, 51-60.
11. Franck, N., Rouby, P., Daprati, E., Daléry, J., Marie-Cardine, M., & Georgieff, N. (2000). Confusion between silent and overt reading in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 41, 357-364.
12. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
13. Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(2), 321-335.
14. Johansson, M., & Mecklinger, A. (2003). The late posterior negativity in ERP studies of episodic memory: Action monitoring and retrieval of attribute conjunctions. Biological Psychology, 64, 91-117.
15. Johansson, M., Stenberg, G., Lindgren, M., & Rosén, I. (2002). Memory for perceived and imagined pictures: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 986-1002.
16. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
17. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Reeder, J. A. (1994). Time-course studies of reality-monitoring and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1409-1419.
18. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
19. Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Foley, H. J., & Foley, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
20. Kuçera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
21. Leynes, P. A. (2002). The effect of specific test queries on source monitoring event-related potentials (ERPs). Brain and Cognition, 50, 218-233.
22. Leynes, P. A., & Bink, M. L. (2002). Did I do that? An ERP study of memory for performed and planned actions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 45, 197-210.
23. Leynes, P. A., Bink, M. L., Marsh, R. L., Allen, J. D., & May, J. C. (2003). Test modality affects source monitoring and event-related potentials. American Journal of Psychology, 116, 389-413.
24. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1137-1151.
25. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
26. Palermo, D. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Word association norms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. K. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6(2), 107-111.
28. Postman, L., & Keppel, G. (1970). Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
29. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209-222.
30. Raye, C. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). Reality monitoring vs. discriminating between external sources of memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 405-408.
31. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 664-678.
32. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47-69.
33. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 696-703.
34. Senkfor, A. J., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2002). Episodic action memory for real objects: An ERP investigation with perform, watch, and imagine action encoding tasks versus a non-action encoding task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 402-419.
35. Takahashi, E., Ohki, K., & Miyashita, Y. (2002). The role of parahippocampal gyrus in source memory for external and internal events. NeuroReport, 13, 1951-1956.
36. Wilding, E. L. (1999). Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: An event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 441-454.
37. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
38. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997a). An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1185-1195.
39. Wilding, E. L., &: Rugg, M. D. (1997b). Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia, 35, 119-128.