Test modality affects source monitoring and event-related potentials

American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 389-413

  Leynes, P Andrew ^a   Bink, Martin L ^b   Marsh, Richard L ^c   Allen, Joseph D ^c   May, J Christopher ^d  

^a The College of New Jersey   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2342590090     PISSN: 00029556     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1423500     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Some problems with the process-dis-sociation approach to memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 181-194.
2. Dodson, C. S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Differential effects of cue dependency on item and source memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1023-1044.
3. Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Webster, L. (1998). Source monitoring: ERP evidence for greater reactivity to nontarget information in older adults. Brain and Cognition, 36(3), 390-430.
4. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
5. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., Mather, M., Kounios, J., Schacter, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format. Psychological Science, 8, 250-257.
6. Kelley, C. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Hollingshead, A. (1989). Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: Judgments of modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1101-1108.
7. Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
9. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electro-encephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
10. Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). The role of the prefrontal cortex during tests of episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 399-406.
11. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
12. Paller, K. A., Kutas, M., & McIsaac, H. K. (1995). Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychological Science, 6, 107-111.
13. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209-222.
14. Rueckl, J. G., & Mathew, S. (1999). Implicit memory for phonological processes in visual stem completion. Memory & Cognition, 27, 1-11.
15. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 664-678.
16. Rugg, M. D., Cox, C. J. C., Doyle, M. C., & Wells, T. (1995). Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia, 33, 471-484.
17. Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 47-69.
18. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 696-703.
19. Senkfor, A. J., & Van Fetten, C. (1998). Who said what: An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1005-1025.
20. Wilding, E. L. (1999). Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: An event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 441-454.
21. Wilding, E. L., Doyle, M. C., & Rugg, M. D. (1995). Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 33, 743-767.
22. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
23. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997a). An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1185-1195.
24. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1997b). Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task. Neuropsychologia, 35, 119-128.