Construct validity of the reporter-interpreter-manager-educator structure for assessing students' patient encounter skills

Academic Medicine

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 799-806

  Tolsgaard, Martin G ^a   Arendrup, Henrick ^a   Lindhardt, Bjarne O ^b   Hillingsø, Jens G ^a   Stoltenberg, Michael ^c   Ringsted, Charlotte ^a  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c KØGE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861682215     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253c8be     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pangaro LN. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999;74:1203-1207.
2. Griffith CH III, Wilson JF. The association of student examination performance with faculty and resident ratings using a modified RIME process. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1020-1023.
3. Pangaro LN. A shared professional framework for anatomy and clinical clerkships. Clin Anat. 2006;19:419-428.
4. Hemmer PA, Papp KK, Mechaber AJ, Durning SJ. Evaluation, grading, and use of the RIME vocabulary on internal medicine clerkships: Results of a national survey and comparison to other clinical clerkships. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20:118-126.
5. Battistone MJ, Milne C, Sande MA, Pangaro LN, Hemmer PA, Shomaker TS. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing formal evaluation sessions and using descriptive vocabulary to assess student performance on a clinical clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:5-10.
6. Durning SJ, Pangaro LN, Denton GD, et al. Intersite consistency as a measurement of programmatic evaluation in a medicine clerkship with multiple, geographically separated sites. Acad Med. 2003;78(10 suppl):S36-S38.
7. Ogburn T, Espey E. The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:666-669.
8. Espey E, Nuthalapaty F, Cox S, et al. To the point: Medical education review of the RIME method for the evaluation of medical student clinical performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:123-133.
9. Roop S, Pangaro LN. Measuring the impact of clinical teaching on student performance during a third-year medicine clerkship. Am J Med. 2001;110:205-209.
10. Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE, Athanasiou T. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York, NY: Free Press; 1986.
11. Sepdham D, Julka M, Hofmann L, Dobbie A. Using the RIME model for learner assessment and feedback. Fam Med. 2007;39:161-163.
12. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy-An overview. Theory Into Practice. 2002;41:212-218.
13. Dewitt D, Carline J, Paauw D, Pangaro L. Pilot study of a "RIME"-based tool for giving feedback in a multi-specialty longitudinal clerkship. Med Educ. 2008;42:1205-1209.
14. Metheny PW, Espey EL, Bienstock J, et al. To the point: Medical education reviews evaluation in context: Assessing learners, teachers, and training programs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:34-37.
15. Davis MH, Karunathilake I. The place of the oral examination in today's assessment systems. Med Teach. 2005;27:294-297.
16. Sanson-Fisher RW, Rolfe IE, Jones P, Ringland C, Agrez M. Trialling a new way to learn clinical skills: Systematic clinical appraisal and learning. Med Educ. 2002;36:1028-1034.
17. Eva K, Regehr G. Knowing when to look it up: A new conception of self-assessment ability. Acad Med. 2007;82:81-84.
18. Stephens MB, Gimbel RW, Pangaro L. The RIME/EMR scheme: An educational approach to clinical documentation in electronic medical records. Acad Med. 2011;86:11-14.
19. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, GS Fortna. The mini-CEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:476-481.
20. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. 5th ed. Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
21. Rolfe IE, Sanson-Fisher RW. Translating learning principles into practice: A new strategy for learning clinical skills. Med Educ. 2002;36:345-352.
22. Norgaard K, Ringsted C, Dolmans D. Validation of a checklist to assess ward round performance in internal medicine. Med Educ. 2004;38:700-707.
23. Reinders ME, Blankenstein AH, van Marwijk HWJ, et al. Reliability of consultation skills assessments using standardised versus real patients. Med Educ. 2011;45:578-584.
24. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008.
25. Govaerts MJB, Schuwirth WT, Van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. Workplace-based assessment: Effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16:151-165.
26. Crossley J, Johnson G, Booth J, Wade W. Good questions, good answers: Construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Med Educ. 2011;45:560-569.
27. Ginsburg S. Respecting the expertise of clinician assessors: Construct alignment is one good answer. Med Educ. 2011;45:546-548.
28. Sloan DA, Donnelly MB, Schartq RW, Felts JL, Blue AV, Strodel WE. The use of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for evaluation and instruction in graduate medical education. J Surg Res. 1996;63:225-230.
29. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet. 2001;357:945-949.