The association of student examination performance with faculty and resident ratings using a modified RIME process

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1020-1023

  Griffith III, Charles H ^a,b   Wilson, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical evaluation; Medical education; Medical students

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INTERNSHIP; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENT;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY;

EID: 46949088814     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0611-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Pangaro LN. Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessment. Med Teach. 2000;22:478-81.
2. Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med. 1999;74:1203-7.
3. Gaglione MM, Moores L, Pangaro L, Hemmer PA. Does group discussion of student clerkship performance at an education committee affect an individual committee member's decisions. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 suppl):S55-8.
4. Hemmer PA, Pangaro L. Using formal evaluation sessions for case-based faculty development during clinical clerkships. Acad Med. 2000;75:1226-1.
5. Battistone MJ, Milne C, Sande MA, Pangaro LN, Hemmer PA, Shomaker TS. The feasibility and acceptability of implementing formal evaluation sessions and using descriptive vocabulary to assess student performance on a clinical clerkship. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14:5-10.
6. Hemmer PA, Pangaro L. The effectiveness of formal evaluation sessions during clinical clerkships in better identifying students with marginal funds of knowledge. Acad Med. 1997;72:641-3.
7. Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson J, Pangaro L. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000;75:167-73.
8. Lavin B, Pangaro L. Internship ratings as a validity outcome measure for an evaluation system to identify inadequate clerkship performance. Acad Med. 1998;73:998-1002.
9. Hemmer PA, Papp KK, Mechaber AJ, Durning SJ. Evaluation, grading, and use of a common evaluation framework by internal medicine clerkship directors: results of a national survey. Teach Learn Med. 2008, in press.
10. Espey E, Ogburn T. The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:666-9.
11. Torre DM, Daley BJ, Sebastian JL, Elnicki DM. Overview of current learning theories for medical educators. Am J Med. 2006;119:903-7.
12. Durning SJ, Pangaro LN, Denton GD, Hemmer PA, Wimmer A, Grau T, Gaglione MA, Moores L. Intersite consistency as a measurement of programmatic evaluation in a medicine clerkship with multiple, geographically separated sites. Acad Med. 2003;78(10 supp):S36-8.
13. Alliance for Clinical Education. Guidebook for Clerkship Directors. Chapter 6. McGaghie WC, Pangaro LN. available at: http://familymed.uthscsa.edu/ ACE/chapter6.htm#clerkship, accessed March 3, 2008.
14. Battistone MJ, Pendleton B, Milne C, et al. Global descriptive evaluations are more responsive than global numeric ratings in detecting students' progress during the inpatient portion of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2001;76(10 suppl.):S105-7.
15. Griffith CH, Wilson JF, Haist SA, Ramsbottom-Lucier M. Do students who work with better housestaff in their medicine clerkship learn more. Acad Med. 1998;73(10 suppl.):S57-9.
16. Akl EA, Maroun N, Klocke RA, Schunemann HJ. A survey of internal medicine residents and faculty about the duration of attendings' inpatient rotations. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1133-9.