Supporting the technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry and design project: A teacher's reflections on practices

Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-72

  Viilo, Marjut ^a   Seitamaa Hakkarainen, Pirita ^a   Hakkarainen, Kai ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

collaborative inquiry learning; reflections; social practices; teacher's guidance; technology enhanced learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751471058     PISSN: 13540602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2011.538497     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. de Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments. Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55-68). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
2. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
3. Bransford, J.D., Barron, B., Pea, R.D., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., ... Sabelli, N.H. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 19-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cagne, R.M., & Merril, M.D. (1990). Integrative goals for instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 23-30.
5. Carey, S., & Smith, C. (1995). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. In D.N. Perkins, J.L. Schwartz, M.M. West, & M.S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 39-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
7. Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25.
8. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstanding about case-study research. In C. Seale., G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 27-42). London: Sage.
9. Gnadinger, C. (2008). Peer-mediated instruction: Assisted performance in the primary classroom. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 129-142.
10. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Progressive inquiry in computer-supported biology classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1072-1088.
11. Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 213-231.
12. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Hedegaard, M., & Chaiklin, S. (2005). Radical-local teaching and learning. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
14. Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1-36.
15. Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004). Problem problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
16. Jones, C., Dirckink-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35-56.
17. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
18. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls of social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
19. Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Designing pedagogical infrastructures in university courses for technology-enhanced collaborative inquiry. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(1), 33-64.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lombardi, M.M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Retrieved February 16, 2010, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/ELI3009.pdf
22. Marcos, J. Sanches, E., & Tillema, H. (2008). Teachers reflecting on their work: Articulating what is said about what is done. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 95-114.
23. Mercer, N., Littleton, K., & Wegerif, R. (2009). Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, & M. Cesar (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 3-27). Rotterdam: Sense.
24. Pollard, A. (2008). Reflective teaching. In A. Pollard, J. Anderson, M. Maddock, S. Swaffield, J. Wain, & P. Warwick (Eds.), Reflective teaching (3rd ed.). Evidenceinformed professional practice (pp. 390-404). New York: Continuum.
25. Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217.
26. Roth, W.M. (1998). Designing communities. Boston: Kluwer.
27. Roth, W.M. (2002). Being and becoming in classroom. Westport, CT: Ablex.
28. Roth, W.M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of method. Rotterdam: Sense.
29. Rule, A.C. (2006). The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
30. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
31. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 109-136.
32. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
33. Strijbos, J.W., Martens, R.L., & Jochems, W.M.G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42(4), 403-424.
34. van Merrienboehr, J.J.G., & Kirschner, P.A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
35. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89-100.