Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 36-41

  Cano Batalla, Jordi ^a   Soliva Garriga, Joan ^a   Campillo Funollet, Marc ^b   Muñoz Viveros, Carlos A ^b   Giner Tarrida, Lluís ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT INTERNACIONAL DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental abutments; Dental air abrasion; Dental cements; Dental prosthesis retention; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE NON EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE-NON-EUGENOL CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTURE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 84861667873     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-741.
2. Johansson LA, Ekfeldt A. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses:A retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:172-176.
3. Karl M, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro effect of load cycling on metal-ceramic cement- and screw-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:137-140.
4. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: A critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-728.
5. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:89-95.
6. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, Choi H, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246.
7. Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Cement- and screw-retained implant-supported prostheses: Up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:87-91.
8. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Cemented versus screwretained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: A 4-year prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:260-265.
9. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-542.
10. Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cementretained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont 2008;17:92-96.
11. Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:793-798.
12. Browning WD, Nelson SK, Cibirka R, Myers ML. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:95-100.
13. Bernal G, Okamura M, Munoz CA. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003;12:111-115.
14. Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, Hirayama H, Garefis PD, Petridis H. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:569-574.
15. Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cementretained dental implant restoration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:587-592.
16. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
17. Heintze SD. Crown pull-off test (crown retention test) to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of luting agents. Dent Mater 2010;26:193-206.
18. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association. Specification No. 96-Dental Water-Based Cements: 2000 [reaffirmed 2005]. http://www.ada.org/830.aspx#96. Accessed 1 November 2011s.
19. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-890.
20. Kent DK, Koka S, Froeschle ML. Retention of cemented implantsupported restorations. J Prosthodont 1997;6:193-196.
21. Covey DA, Kent DK, Germain HAS, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implantsupported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-348.
22. Emms M, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2007;16:3-9.
23. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspectives and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75.
24. Rappelli G, Corso M, Coccia E, Camaioni E, Di Felice R, Procaccini M. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments. Minerva Stomatol 2008;57:95-101.
25. Abreu A, Loza MA, Elias A, Mukhopadhyay S, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of metal type and surface treatment on in vitro tensile strength of copings cemented to minimally retentive preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:199-207.
26. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:135-141.
27. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:116-121.