Comparison of Uniaxial Resistance Forces of Cements Used with Implant-Supported Crowns

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 536-542

  Akça, Kivanç ^a,b   Iplikçioǧlu, Haldun ^a   Çehreli, Murat C ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Çetin Emeç Bulvan 6 ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental cements; Implant supported prosthesis; Luting cements; Retention

Indexed keywords

GOLD ALLOY; TOOTH CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; MATERIALS TESTING; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0036633574     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77: 28-35.
2. Chee W. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prosthesis: Which is better? [current issues forum] Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-138.
3. Chee WW, Torbati A, AlbouyJP. Retrievable cemented implant restorations. J Prosthodont 1998;7:120-125.
4. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:633-645.
5. Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: The Toronto study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:311-321.
6. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1993:651-685.
7. Kent DK, Koka S, Banks SB, Beatty MW. Factors influencing retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder. Implant Dent 1996;5:96-99.
8. Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-348.
9. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-741.
10. Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665.
11. Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Dana CL, Beatty MW. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: A pilot study. Implant Dent 1995;4:32-35.
12. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514.
13. Taylor TD, Belser U, Meriscske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl):101-107.
14. Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865-868.
15. Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43-47.
16. Felton DA. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prosthesis: Which is better? [current issues forum] Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:138-139.
17. Levine RA, Clem DS, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Preliminary results at 6 or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:237-242.
18. Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, Van Roekel NB. Bending overload and implant fracture. A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-334.
19. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part I: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997:8:161-172.
20. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:66-75.
21. Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:545-549.
22. Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665.
23. Dixon D, Breeding L, Lilly K. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-890.
24. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:645-649.
25. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-178.
26. Levine RA, Clem DS, Wilson TG, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14: 516-520.