Retentiveness of Dental Cements Used with Metallic Implant Components

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 793-798

  Squier, Rachel S ^a   Agar, John R ^a   Duncan, Jacqueline P ^a   Taylor, Thomas D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Cemented implant restorations; Dental cements; Dental implants

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL ALLOY; FLECKS; FUJI GLASS IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJI GLASS-IONOMER LINING CEMENT; FUJIPLUS; GLASS IONOMER; PANAVIA EX; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE NON EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE-NON-EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADHESIVENESS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; PHOSPHATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0035513295     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Chee W, Felton D, Johnson P, Sullivan D. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? [current issues forum]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-141.
2. Zarb G, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-194.
3. Jemt T, Laney W, Harris D, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: A 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
4. Jemr T, Lindén B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-44.
5. Tolman D, Laney W. Tissue-integrated prosthesis complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:477-484.
6. Laney W, Jemt T, Harris D, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: Progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:49-54.
7. Carlson B, Carlsson G. Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:90-94.
8. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in full-arch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9:169-178.
9. Carter G, Hunter K. Factors influencing the retention of cemented implant-supported crowns. N Z Dent J 1997;93: 36-38.
10. Hebel K, Gajjar R. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.
11. Taylor T. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:74-78.
12. Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial dentures: A 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:645-649.
13. Breeding L, Dixon D, Bogacki M, Tietge J. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-741.
14. Ramp M, Dixon D, Ramp L, Breeding L, Barber L. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514.
15. Agar J, Cameron S, Hughbanks J, Parker M. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43-47.
16. Pauletto N, Lahiffe B, Walton J. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865-868.
17. Clayton G, Driscoll C, Hondrum S. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne Implant System. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665.
18. Kerby R, McGlumphy E, Holloway J. Some physical properties of implant abutment luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:321-325.
19. GaRey D, Tjan A, James R, Caputo A. Effects of thermocycling, load-cycling, and blood contamination on cemented implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:124-132.
20. Dixon D, Breeding L, Lilly K. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-890.
21. Koka S, Ewoldsen N, Dana C, Beatty M. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder: A pilot study. Implant Dent 1995;4:32-35.
22. Kent D, Koka S, Froeschle M. Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 1997;6:193-196.
23. 3. Schneider R. Evaluation of the retention of castings to endosseous dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:73-78.
24. Covey D, Kent D, St Germain H Jr, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:344-348.
25. Jorgensen K. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;13:35-40.
26. Kaufman E, Coelho D, Colin L. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11:487-502.
27. Dodge W, Weed R, Baez R, Buchanan R. The effect of convergence angle on retention and resistance form. Quintessence Int 1985;16:191-194.
28. Ernst C, Wenzl N, Stender E, Willershausen B. Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:472-476.
29. Tjan A, Li T. Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:478-484.
30. Diaz-Arnold A, Vargas M, Haselton D. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:135-141.
31. Rubo J, Pegoraro L. Tensile bond strength of a composite resin cement for bonded prosthesis to various dental alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:230-234.
32. Imbery T, Burgess J, Naylor W. Tensile strength of three resin cements following two alloy surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:59-67.
33. Diaz-Arnold A, Williams V, Aquilino S. Tensile strengths of three luting agents for adhesion of fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:115-122.
34. Gorodovsky S, Zidan O. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:269-274.
35. Michelini F, Belser U, Scherrer S. Tensile bond strengths of gold and porcelain inlays to extracted teeth using three cements. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:324-331.
36. Mojon P, Hawbolt E, MacEntee M, Belser U. Maximum bond strength of dental luting cement to amalgam alloy. J Dent Res 1989;68:1545-1549.
37. Mojon P, Hawbolt E, MacEntee M, Ma P. Early bond strength of luting cements to a precious alloy. J Dent Res 1992;71:1633-1639.
38. Christensen R. Subject: Glass ionomer-resin cements (GIR). Clinical Research Associates Newsletter 1995;19(3):1-2.