The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-9

  Emms, Mark ^a   Tredwin, Christopher J ^a   Setchell, Derrick J ^a   Moles, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cementation; Dental temporary cement; Implant supported prosthesis; Screw retention

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; EUGENOL; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; TEMP BOND; TEMP-BOND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VINYL POLYSILOXANE; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; EUGENOL; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYVINYLS; SILOXANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 33846451772     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00150.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U: Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359
2. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC: Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35
3. Jorgensen KD: The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;13:35-40
4. Kaufman EG, Coelho DH, Colin L: Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:487-502
5. Gilboe DB, Teteruck WR: Fundamentals of extracoronal tooth preparation. Part 1. Retention and resistance form. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32:651-656
6. Guyer SE: Multiple preparations for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:529-553
7. Bernal G, Okamura M, Munoz CA: The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003;12:111-115
8. Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA Jr, et al: Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-348
9. Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, et al: Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-514
10. Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO: The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-665
11. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, et al: Use of luting agents with an implant system: part 1. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-741