Effect of surface treatment on cell responses to grades 4 and 5 titanium for orthodontic mini-implants

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 141, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 705-714

  Galli, Carlo ^a   Piemontese, Marilina ^a   Ravanetti, Francesca ^a   Lumetti, Simone ^a   Passeri, Giovanni ^a   Gandolfini, Mauro ^a   MacAluso, Guido M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; DENTAL ALLOY; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPROTEGERIN; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRAIN 3T3; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; INSTRUMENTATION; LUMINESCENCE; METABOLISM; MOUSE; ORTHODONTICS; OSTEOBLAST; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

3T3 CELLS; ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ANIMALS; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; LUMINESCENT MEASUREMENTS; MICE; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPROTEGERIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84861619926     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Z. Hedayati, S.M. Hashemi, B. Zamiri, and H.R. Fattahi Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36 2007 588 592
2. E. Mizrahi, and B. Mizrahi Mini-screw implants (temporary anchorage devices): orthodontic and pre-prosthetic applications J Orthod 34 2007 80 94
3. E. Justens, and H. De Bruyn Clinical outcome of mini-screws used as orthodontic anchorage Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 10 2008 174 180
4. K.I. Janssen, G.M. Raghoebar, A. Vissink, and A. Sandham Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics - a review of various systems in animal and human studies Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23 2008 75 88
5. R.A. Mischkowski, P. Kneuertz, B. Florvaag, F. Lazar, J. Koebke, and J.E. Zoller Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37 2008 948 954
6. M. Schatzle, R. Mannchen, M. Zwahlen, and N.P. Lang Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review Clin Oral Implants Res 20 2009 1351 1359
7. C. Galli, S. Guizzardi, G. Passeri, D. Martini, A. Tinti, and G. Mauro Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces J Periodontol 76 2005 364 372
8. C. Galli, G. Passeri, F. Ravanetti, E. Elezi, M. Pedrazzoni, and G.M. Macaluso Rough surface topography enhances the activation of Wnt/ß-catenin signaling in mesenchymal cells J Biomed Mater Res A 95 2010 682 690
9. G.B. Schneider, R. Zaharias, D. Seabold, J. Keller, and C. Stanford Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies J Biomed Mater Res A 69 2004 462 468
10. G.B. Schneider, H. Perinpanayagam, M. Clegg, R. Zaharias, D. Seabold, and J. Keller Implant surface roughness affects osteoblast gene expression J Dent Res 82 2003 372 376
11. B.D. Boyan, L.F. Bonewald, E.P. Paschalis, C.H. Lohmann, J. Rosser, and D.L. Cochran Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography Calcif Tissue Int 71 2002 519 529
12. B.D. Boyan, S. Lossdorfer, L. Wang, G. Zhao, C.H. Lohmann, and D.L. Cochran Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies Eur Cell Mater 6 2003 22 27
13. Z. Schwartz, C.H. Lohmann, J. Oefinger, L.F. Bonewald, D.D. Dean, and B.D. Boyan Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage Adv Dent Res 13 1999 38 48
14. G. Zhao, A.L. Raines, M. Wieland, Z. Schwartz, and B.D. Boyan Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography Biomaterials 28 2007 2821 2829
15. D. Buser, N. Broggini, M. Wieland, R.K. Schenk, A.J. Denzer, and D.L. Cochran Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface J Dent Res 83 2004 529 533
16. Y. Germanier, S. Tosatti, N. Broggini, M. Textor, and D. Buser Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs Clin Oral Implants Res 17 2006 251 257
17. L. Carlsson, T. Rostlund, B. Albrektsson, and T. Albrektsson Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 1988 21 24
18. D. Buser, T. Nydegger, H.P. Hirt, D.L. Cochran, and L.P. Nolte Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 1998 611 619
19. D. Buser, R.K. Schenk, S. Steinemann, J.P. Fiorellini, C.H. Fox, and H. Stich Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs J Biomed Mater Res 25 1991 889 902
20. A. Wennerberg, and T. Albrektsson Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review Clin Oral Implants Res 20 Suppl 4 2009 172 184
21. K. Gotfredsen, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2 2000 120 128
22. A. Wennerberg, and T. Albrektsson On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25 2010 63 74
23. F. Ravanetti, P. Borghetti, E. De Angelis, R. Chiesa, F.M. Martini, and C. Gabbi In vitro cellular response and in vivo primary osteointegration of electrochemically modified titanium Acta Biomater 6 2010 1014 1024
24. M. Fini, A. Cigada, G. Rondelli, R. Chiesa, R. Giardino, and G. Giavaresi In vitro and in vivo behaviour of Ca- and P-enriched anodized titanium Biomaterials 20 1999 1587 1594
25. L. Franco Rde, R. Chiesa, P.T. de Oliveira, M.M. Beloti, and A.L. Rosa Bone response to a Ca- and P-enriched titanium surface obtained by anodization Braz Dent J 19 2008 15 20
26. F. Schwarz, M. Herten, M. Sager, M. Wieland, M. Dard, and J. Becker Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs Clin Oral Implants Res 18 2007 481 488
27. L. Le Guehennec, M.A. Lopez-Heredia, B. Enkel, P. Weiss, Y. Amouriq, and P. Layrolle Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces Acta Biomater 4 2008 535 543
28. P. Linez-Bataillon, F. Monchau, M. Bigerelle, and H.F. Hildebrand In vitro MC3T3 osteoblast adhesion with respect to surface roughness of Ti6Al4V substrates Biomol Eng 19 2002 133 141
29. C. Galli, G.M. Macaluso, M. Piemontese, and G. Passeri Titanium topography controls FoxO/beta-catenin signaling J Dent Res 90 2011 360 364
30. L. Le Guehennec, E. Goyenvalle, M.A. Lopez-Heredia, P. Weiss, Y. Amouriq, and P. Layrolle Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits Clin Oral Implants Res 19 2008 1103 1110
31. P.R. Klokkevold, P. Johnson, S. Dadgostari, A. Caputo, J.E. Davies, and R.D. Nishimura Early endosseous integration enhanced by dual acid etching of titanium: a torque removal study in the rabbit Clin Oral Implants Res 12 2001 350 357
32. G. Cordioli, Z. Majzoub, A. Piattelli, and A. Scarano Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 2000 668 674
33. F. Schwarz, D. Ferrari, M. Herten, I. Mihatovic, M. Wieland, and M. Sager Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs J Periodontol 78 2007 2171 2184
34. R. Olivares-Navarrete, S.L. Hyzy, D.L. Hutton, C.P. Erdman, M. Wieland, and B.D. Boyan Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage Biomaterials 31 2010 2728 2735
35. M. Jayaraman, U. Meyer, M. Buhner, U. Joos, and H.P. Wiesmann Influence of titanium surfaces on attachment of osteoblast-like cells in vitro Biomaterials 25 2004 625 631
36. C. Masaki, G.B. Schneider, R. Zaharias, D. Seabold, and C. Stanford Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression Clin Oral Implants Res 16 2005 650 656
37. K. Anselme Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials Biomaterials 21 2000 667 681
38. D.A. Puleo, and A. Nanci Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface Biomaterials 20 1999 2311 2321
39. G. Passeri, A. Cacchioli, F. Ravanetti, C. Galli, E. Elezi, and G.M. Macaluso Adhesion pattern and growth of primary human osteoblastic cells on five commercially available titanium surfaces Clin Oral Implants Res 21 2010 756 765
40. T. Shemesh, B. Geiger, A.D. Bershadsky, and M.M. Kozlov Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: a physical mechanism Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 2005 12383 12388
41. A. Pae, S.S. Kim, H.S. Kim, and Y.H. Woo Osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on turned, blasted, and anodized titanium surfaces Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26 2011 475 481
42. D.M. Dohan Ehrenfest, L. Vazquez, Y.J. Park, G. Sammartino, and J.P. Bernard Identification card and codification of the chemical and morphological characteristics of 14 dental implant surfaces J Oral Implantol 37 2011 525 542