Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 364-372

  Galli, Carlo ^a   Guizzardi, Giovanni ^a   Passeri, Giovanni ^a   Martini, Desiree ^b   Tinti, Anna ^b   Mauro, Giovanni ^a   Macaluso, Guido Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell division; Comparison studies; Dental implants; Titanium; Wound healing

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPROTEGERIN; TITANIUM;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HEALING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MANDIBLE; OSTEOBLAST; PHENOTYPE; RAMAN SPECTROMETRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADSORPTION; AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; GLYCOPROTEINS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPROTEGERIN; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; RECEPTORS, TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS, RAMAN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 18744383336     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.364     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Links J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-2232.
2. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummer TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
3. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Whitson SW, Yliheikkila P, Felton DA. Formation of mineralizing osteoblast cultures on machined, titanium oxide grit-blasted, and plasma sprayed titanium surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14: 37-47.
4. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:55-63.
5. 2 particles. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003; 14: 50-56.
6. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke GSU, Lee AJC, eds. Clinical Implant Materials, vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher BV; 1990:309.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Kroll JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 24-30.
8. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt H, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:611-619.
9. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:120-128.
10. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially avalaible oral implants systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8: 622-633.
11. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, design, and surface topographies: Their effect on osseointegration - A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:675-690.
12. Beresford JN, Gallagher JA, Poser JW, Russell RG. Production of osteocalcin by human bone cells in vitro. Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, parathyroid hormone, and glucocorticoids. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 1984;5:229-234.
13. Siggelkow H, Hilmes D, Robenstorff K, Kurre W, Engel I, Hufner M. Analysis of human primary bone cells by fluorescence activated cell scanning: Methodological problems and preliminary results. Clin Chim Acta 1998;272: 111-125.
14. Farley JR, Hall SL, Tanner MA, Wergedal JE. Specific activity of skeletal alkaline phosphatase in human osteoblast-line cells regulated by phosphate, phosphate esters, and phosphate analogs and release of alkaline phosphatase activity inversely regulated by calcium. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:497-508.
15. Boyan BD, Batzer R, Kieswetter K, et al. Titanium surface roughness alters responsiveness of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85.
16. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-681.
17. Thomas K, Cook SD. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation and direct bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res 1985;19:875-901.
18. Feng B, Weng J, Yang BC, Qu SX, Zhang XD. Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and adhesion of osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2003;24:4663-4670.
19. Denis FA, Hanarp P, Sutherland DS, et al. Protein adsorption on model surfaces with controlled nanotopography and chemistry. Langmuir 2002;18:819-828.
20. Shah AK, Sinha RK, Hickok NJ, Tuan RS. High-resolution morphometric analysis of human osteoblastic cell adhesion on clinically relevant orthopedic alloys. Bone 1999; 24:499-506.
21. Stein GS, Lian JB, Stein JS, van Wijen AJ, Frenkel B, Montecino M. Mechanisms regulating osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. In: Bilezikian JPRL, Rodan GA, eds. Principles of Bone Biology. San Diego: Academy Press; 1996:69-86.
22. Aubin JE. Bone stem cells. J Biochem 1998(Suppl.): 30-31;73-82.
23. Katagiri T, Takahashi N. Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Diseases 2002;8:147-159.
24. Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L, et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mat 2003;6:22-27.