Computation of variance in compartment model parameter estimates from dynamic PET data

Medical Physics

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 2638-2648

  Kamasak, Mustafa E ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

dynamic PET; kinetic parameter estimation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODELS; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); KINETIC PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TISSUE;

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS; COMPARTMENT MODEL; DYNAMIC PET; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; MODEL COMPLEXITY; NOISE REALIZATIONS; STANDARD DEVIATION; TIME-ACTIVITY CURVES;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 84861591458     PISSN: 00942405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1118/1.3702456     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine, edited by, J. A. Jacquez, (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1985).
2. H. Watabe, R. E. Carson, and H. Iida, PET kinetic analysis-Compartmental model., Ann. Nucl. Med. 20 (9), 583-588 (2006). 10.1007/BF02984655
3. E. D. Morris, C. J. Endres, K. C. Schmidt, B. T. Christian, R. F. Muzic, Jr., and R. E. Fisher, Kinetic modeling in PET., Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, edited by, M. Wernick, and, J. Aarsvold, (Academic, San Diego, 2004), Chap..
4. K. Chen, M. Lawson, E. Reiman, A. Cooper, D. Feng, S. C. Huang, D. Bandy, and D. Ho, Generalized linear least squares method for fast generation of myocardial blood flow parametric images with n-13 ammonia PET., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 236-243 (1998). 10.1109/42.700735 (Pubitemid 128747676)
5. C. Tsoumpas, F. E. Turkheimer, and K. Thielemans, Study of direct and indirect parametric estimation methods of linear models in dynamic positron emission tomography., Med. Phys. 35 (4), 1299-1309 (2008). 10.1118/1.2885369 (Pubitemid 351457497)
6. Tracer Kinetics in Biomedical Research: From Data to Model, edited by, C. Cobelli, D. Foster, and, G. Toffolo, (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000).
7. The Minimum Description Length Principle, edited, P. D. Grunwald, (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2007).
8. E. D. Morris, M. E. Kamasak, B. T. Christian, T. E. Cheng, and C. A. Bouman, Visualizing all the fits: Evaluating the quality and precision of parametric images created from direct reconstruction of PET sinogram data., International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Arlington, Virginia, April 6-9 (IEEE, New York, 2006), pp. 291-294. (Pubitemid 44732310)
9. J. A. Fessler, Mean and variance of implicitly defined bias estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography., IEEE Trans. Image Process. 5 (3), 493-506 (1996). 10.1109/83.491322
10. J. Qi and R. Huessman, Theoretical study of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for region of interest quantification., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25 (5), 640-648 (2006). 10.1109/TMI.2006.873223
11. J. A. Fessler, Penalized weighted least-squares image reconstruction for positron emission tomography., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13 (2), 290-300 (1994). 10.1109/42.293921
12. G. Wang and J. Qi, Analysis of penalized likelihood image reconstruction for dynamic PET quantification., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 28 (4), 608-620 (2009). 10.1109/TMI.2008.2008971
13. F. Pektas and I. S. Yetik, Covariance expressions for implicit estimators of kinetic parameters with dynamic PET., IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (IEEE, New York, 2008), pp. 316-320.
14. M. E. Kamasak, Analysis of kinetic parameter estimates for dynamic PET., Proceedings of IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications (SIU 2011), Kemer Antalya, April 20-22, 2011 (in Turkish).
15. S. Takikawa, V. Dhawan, P. Spetsieris, W. Robeson, T. Chaly, R. Dahl, D. Margouleff, and D. Eidelberg, Noninvasive quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose PET studies with and estimated input function derived from a population-based arterial blood curve., Radiology 188, 131-136 (1993). (Pubitemid 23183112)
16. S. Eberl, A. R. Anayat, R. R. Fulton, P. K. Hooper, and M. J. Fulham, Evaluation of two population-based input functions for quantitative neurological FDG PET studies., Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 24 (3), 299-304 (1997). 10.1007/BF01728767 (Pubitemid 27165859)
17. R. F. Muzic, Jr. and B. T. Christian, Evaluation of objective functions for estimation of kinetic parameters., Med. Phys. 33 (2), 342-353 (2006). 10.1118/1.2135907 (Pubitemid 43183976)
18. M. Yaqub, R. Boellaard, M. A. Kropholler, and A. A. Lammertsma, Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic pet studies., Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 4217-4232 (2006). 10.1088/0031-9155/51/17/007 (Pubitemid 44261841)
19. Optimization by Vector Space Methods, edited, D. G. Luenberger, (Wiley, New York, 1969).
20. L. Fu, J. R. Stickel, R. D. Badawi, and J. Qi, Quantitative accuracy of penalized-likelihood reconstruction for ROI activity estimation., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 56 (1), 167-172 (2009). 10.1109/TNS.2008.2005063
21. G. W. Oehlert, A note on the delta method., Am. Stat. 46 (1), 27-29 (1992). 10.2307/2684406
22. R. F. Muzic, Jr. and S. Cornelius, COMKAT: Compartment model kinetic analysis tool., J. Nucl. Med. 42 (4), 636-645 (2001). 10.1118/1.2135907 (Pubitemid 32298286)
23. R. D. Schonbachler, P. M. Gucker, M. Arigoni, S. Kneifel, F. X. Vollenweider, A. Buck, C. Burger, T. Berthold, M. Bruhlmeier, P. A. Schubiger, and S. M. Ametamey, PET imaging of dopamine transporters in the human brain using 11C-β-CPPIT, a cocaine derivative lacking the 2β-ester function., Nucl. Med. Biol. 29, 19-27 (2002). 10.1016/S0969-8051(01)00271-2 (Pubitemid 34088160)
24. V. Treyer, J. Streffer, M. T. Wyss, A. Bettio, S. M. Ametamey, U. Fischer, M. Schmidt, F. Gasparini, C. Hock, and A. Buck, Evaluation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 using PET and 11C-ABP688: Assessment of methods., J. Nucl. Med. 48 (7), 1207-1215 (2007). 10.2967/jnumed.107.039578 (Pubitemid 47052662)
25. M. A. Lodge, H. A. Jacene, R. Pili, and R. L. Wahl, Reproducibility of tumor blood flow quantification with 15O-water PET., J. Nucl. Med. 49 (10), 1620-1627 (2008). 10.2967/jnumed.108.052076
26. B. Weber, N. Spath, M. Wyss, D. Wild, C. Burger, R. Stanley, and A. Buck, Quantitative cerebral blood flow measurements in the rat using a beta-probe and H 2 15 O., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23, 1455-1460 (2003). 10.1097/01.WCB.0000095799.98378.7D (Pubitemid 38018264)
27. 3O-N-n- propylnorapomorphine in the human brain., J. Nucl. Med. 50 (5), 703-710 (2005). 10.2967/jnumed.108.058503
28. R. A. Hawkins, M. E. Phelps, and S. C. Huang, Effects of temporal sampling, glucose metabolic rates, and disruptions of the blood-brain barrier on the FDG model with and without a vascular compartment: Studies in human brain tumours with PET., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 6, 170-183 (1986). 10.1038/jcbfm.1986.30 (Pubitemid 16109313)
29. S.-C. Huang, M. E. Phelps, E. J. Hoffman, and D. E. Kuhl, Error sensitivity of fluorodeoxyglucose method for measurement of cerebral metabolic rate of glucose., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1 (4), 391-401 (1981). 10.1038/jcbfm.1981.43 (Pubitemid 12142411)
30. M. E. Kamasak, C. A. Bouman, E. D. Morris, and K. Sauer, Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24 (5), 636-650 (2005). 10.1109/TMI.2005.845317 (Pubitemid 40680125)
31. F. O'sullivan and A. Saha, Use of ridge regression for improved estimation of kinetic constants from PET data., IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 (2), 115-125 (1999). 10.1109/42.759111
32. O. L. Munk, L. Bass, K. Roelsgaard, D. Bender, S. B. Hansen, and S. Keiding, Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by PET: Importance of dual-input blood sampling., J. Nucl. Med. 42, 795-801 (2001). (Pubitemid 32453472)
33. J. C. Price, W. C. Drevets, J. Ruszkiewicz, P. J. Greer, V. L. Villemagne, L. Xu, S. Mazumdar, M. N. Cantwell, and C. A. Mathis, Sequential H2 15O PET studies in baboons: Before and after amphetamine., J. Nucl. Med. 43 (8), 1090-1100 (2002). (Pubitemid 34847934)
34. T. Siessmeier, Y. Zhou, H.-G. Buchholz, C. Landvogt, I. Vernaleken, M. Piel, R. Schirrmacher, F. Rosch, M. Schreckenberger, D. F. Wong, P. Cumming, G. Grunder, and P. Bartenstein, Parametric mapping of binding in human brain of D2 receptor ligands of different affinities., J. Nucl. Med. 46 (6), 964-972 (2005). (Pubitemid 43733511)
35. N. Ginovart, A. A. Wilson, J. H. Meyer, D. Hussey, and S. Houle, Positron emission tomography quantification of 11C-DASB binding to the human serotonin transporter: Modeling strategies., J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 1342-1353 (2001). 10.1097/00004647-200111000-00010 (Pubitemid 33130946)
36. 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses., J. Nucl. Med. 46, 1264-1271 (2005). (Pubitemid 43733474)
37. J. Delforge, A. Syrota, and B. M. Mazoyer, Identifiability analysis and parameter identification of an in vivo ligand-receptor model from PET data., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37 (7), 653-661 (1990). 10.1109/10.55673 (Pubitemid 20293265)
38. J. Delforge, A. Syrota, and B. M. Mazoyer, Experimental design optimisation: Theory and application to estimation of receptor model parameters using dynamic positron emission tomography., Phys. Med. Biol. 34 (4), 419-435 (1989). 10.1088/0031-9155/34/4/002 (Pubitemid 19089445)
39. S. Jovkar, A. C. Evans, M. Diksic, H. Nakai, and Y. L. Yamamoto, Minimisation of parameter estimation errors in dynamic PET: Choice of scanning schedules., Phys. Med. Biol. 34 (7), 895-908 (1989). 10.1088/0031-9155/34/7/010 (Pubitemid 19169132)