Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1264-1271

  El Fakhri, Georges ^a   Sitek, Arkadiusz ^b   Guérin, Bastien ^a   Kijewski, Marie Foley ^a   Di Carli, Marcelo F ^a   Moore, Stephen C ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compartment analysis; Factor analysis of dynamic sequences; Quantitative 82Rb cardiac PET

Indexed keywords

DIPYRIDAMOLE; RUBIDIUM 82; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; RUBIDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 25444484119     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Mullani NA, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VIII. Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:775-789.
2. Gould KL. Clinical cardiac PET using generator-produced Rb-82: a review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1989;12:245-251.
3. Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Bergmann SR. Implementation and evaluation of a two-compartment model for quantification of myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Circ Res. 1992;70:496-507.
4. Dahl J, Muzik O, Wolfe ER, Allman C, Hutchins G, Schwaiger M. Myocardial rubidium-82 tissue kinetics assessed by dynamic positron emission tomography as a marker of myocardial cell membrane integrity and viability. Circulation. 1996;93:238-245.
5. Chen EQ, MacIntyre WJ, Fouad FM, et al. Measurement of cardiac output with first-pass determination during rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:993-996.
6. deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, Hewitt T, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RSB. Detection of serial changes in absolute myocardial perfusion with Rb-82 PET. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1426-1435.
7. Knesaurek K, Machac J, Krynyckyi BR, Almeida OD. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET imaging. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1350-1356.
8. Lin JW, Sciacca RR, Chou RL, Laine FA, Bergmann SR. Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:201-208.
9. Lin JW, Laine FA, Akinboboye O, Bergmann SR. Use of wavelet transforms in analysis of time-activity data from cardiac PET. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:194-201.
10. Gould KL. Absolute myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve. Coronary Artery Stenosis and Reversing Atherosclerosis. New York, NY: Arnold; 1999:247-273.
11. Coxson PG, Huesman RH, Borland L. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:660-667.
12. Barber DC, Nijran KS. Factor analysis of rose bengale liver function studies. In: Goris M, ed. Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Stanford, CA: Springer; 1981:13-31.
13. Houston AS. The effect of apex-finding errors on factor images obtained from factor analysis and oblique transformation. Phys Med Biol. 1984;29:1109-1116.
14. Samal M, Karny M, Surova H, Penicka P, Marikova E, Dienstbier Z. On the existence of an unambiguous solution in factor analysis of dynamic studies. Phys Med Biol. 1989;34:223-228.
15. Van Daele M, Joosten J, Devos P, Vandecruys A, Willems JL, De Roo M. Background correction in factor analysis of dynamic scintigraphic studies: necessity and implementation. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:1477-1485.
16. Buvat I, Benali H, Frouin F, Bazin JP, Di Paola R. Target apex-seeking in factor analysis of medical image sequences. Phys Med Biol. 1993;38:123-138.
17. Sitek A, Di Bella EVR, Gullberg GT. Factor analysis with a priori knowledge: application in dynamic cardiac SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:2619-2638.
18. Sitek A, Gullberg GT, Huesman RH. Correction for ambiguous solutions in factor analysis using a penalized least squares objective. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:216-225.
19. Di Paola R, Bazin JP, Aubry F, et al. Handling of dynamic sequences in nuclear medicine. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1982;29:1310-1321.
20. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vettering WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. In: The Aft of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 1992:420-425.
21. Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Simth EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB. Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys. 1994;21:299-302.
22. Harrison RL, Haynor DR, Gillispie SB, Vannoy SD, Kaplan MS, Lewellen TK. A public-domain simulation system for emission tomography: photon tracking through heterogeneous attenuation using importance sampling [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(suppl):60P.
23. Harrison RL, Vannoy SD, Haynor DR, Gillispie SB, Kaplan MS, Lewellen TK. Preliminary experience with the photon history generator module of a public-domain simulation system for emission tomography. Conf Rec Nucl Sci Symp. 1993;2:1154-1158.
24. Palmer MR, Bronwell GL. Annihilation density distribution calculations for medically important position emitters. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11:373-378.
25. Haynor DR, Harrison RL, Lewellen TK. The use of importance sampling techniques to improve the efficiency of photon tracking in emission tomography simulations. Med Phys. 1991;18:990-1001.
26. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601-609.
27. Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AHR, von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:522-927.
28. Bergstrom M, Eriksson L, Bohm C, Blomqvist G, Litton J. Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector position camera by integral transformation of the projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7:42-50.
29. Sitek A, Di Bella EVR, Gullberg GT, Huesman RH. Rejection of liver contamination in teboroxime dynamic cardiac imaging using factor analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2002;9:197-205.